Short Reads

Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority now officially launched

Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority now officially launc

Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority now officially launched

29.08.2017 NL law

The Act has been in the Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) for more than a year, but the news became official on 1 August 2017: the Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority (ANVS) is now an independent administrative body (zelfstandig bestuursorgaan). The ANVS has no legal personality and is entirely dependent on the goodwill of the State Secretary of Infrastructure and Environment for its finances and staff. However, it is not a powerless extension of the ministry, on the contrary.

The Act establishing the ANVS and the accompanying amending Decree put the ANVS at a fair distance from the Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment and allocate ample powers to the ANVS in the area of ​​regulation, licensing and supervision.

Organization

The ANVS was formed on 1 January 2015 following the merger of the Department of Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards with the Nuclear Installations and Security Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Nuclear Advisory Network of the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, and the Radiation Protection Team of  the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland). It has so far functioned as an agency of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. On 1 August 2017 it became an independent administrative body.

Legally speaking, the ANVS is a small organization, consisting of two or three members who together form the board. At present, the board consists of two members, a chairman of the board and a deputy chairman of the board. However, this board is in charge of an organization of considerable size involving about 120 employees, made available by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment.

The establishment of the ANVS follows the recommendations of the International Agency for Nuclear Energy (IAEA):  separation of the economic and environmental interests that are involved with nuclear energy. In this context, the ANVS has formulated the following mission: "The Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority is independent and expert, it continuously monitors and promotes nuclear safety, radiation protection and security for this and the next generation". The relationship between ANVS and the ministry is similar to that between the board of directors of a company and its shareholders. The state secretary appoints, suspends and dismisses the members of the board and establishes their remuneration, but has little influence on ANVS policy. Article 12a of the Act stipulates that, by way of derogation from the general rule, the state secretary may not establish policies (guidelines) regarding the task of the ANVS.

Tasks and powers

The ANVS is responsible for monitoring nuclear safety and radiation protection, transport of radioactive materials and radioactive waste, radiation incidents and security and safeguards. The ANVS also

  • develops and formulates policy and legislation and/or advises on it;
  • grants licences and records notifications;
  • registers and acknowledges experts and radiation physicians;
  • assesses the technical and organizational safety of nuclear installations;
  • takes measures to protect against radiation;
  • monitors compliance with the regulations based on the Nuclear Energy Act.

Finally, the ANVS is responsible for crisis preparation, crisis management, public awareness and national and international cooperation.

The Act gives the ANVS the power to make regulations regarding organizational or technical subjects.

Thus, almost the entire implementation of the Nuclear Energy Act and the underlying general administrative measures (AMvBs) rests with the ANVS. An exception is the approval of the financial security arrangements that operators of nuclear facilities must set for the cost of decommissioning at the end of their lifetime. This power will remain with the ministers of Finance and Infrastructure and Environment jointly.

The ANVS is clearly taking  its new status seriously. On 1 August 2017, it published the following documents:

Establishments that fall under the Nuclear Energy Act will definitely notice the new status of the ANVS through the combination of legislative and executive powers. This combination enables the ANVS to react with regulations on what it encounters as a supervisor. This gives the ANVS a strong position in its contacts with the nuclear facilities. If an operator indicates to the ANVS that its operations comply with the rules, the ANVS can respond to it by adjusting the rules.

Legal protection

The broad powers of the ANVS raise questions about how legal protection will be arranged. Of course, after 1 August 2017, this will be available through the administrative courts and before the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State. When it comes to the ANVS regulatory powers, however, expectations should not be overestimated. There is no administrative appeal process in respect of the ANVS regulations and the so-called exceptional review (in the context of a permit or enforcement decision) is used cautiously. Interested parties will primarily have to rely on statutory possibilities for public consultation, assuming the ANVS takes this initiative seriously.

Whether the ministry can offer any legal protection regarding the ANVS regulations is another question raised by these new developments. This is because, in fact, the state secretary ultimately supervises administrative bodies like the ANVS. It can request information from the ANVS and annul its decisions. The latter, however, in derogation from the general rule, will only take place if there is a violation of the law. The state secretary cannot therefore intervene because of public interest. In effect, there is little added value in seeking legal protection through the ministry over that provided by the courts.

What can we expect from the ANVS?

Nuclear energy is a sensitive and important subject. The Dutch government has expressed its concern by creating an independent authority with considerable powers, at a distance from politics. This separation is a good thing: to have the economic interests of energy supply on the one hand and the environmental interests on the other.  At the same time, this arrangement is at risk of undermining the ministerial responsibility for the operation of the ANVS. The state secretary has only limited possibilities to intervene, even at the request of parliament. The ANVS should therefore act responsibly with its powers while keeping an eye on the interests of industry and society and not lose itself in the procedures and regulations.

The post "Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Authority now officially launched" is a post of www.stibbeblog.nl

Tijn Kortmann Alle posts van Tijn Kortmann

Related news

20.10.2021 NL law
FAQ: What will change with the entry into force of the Woo compared to the Wob? An update

Short Reads - The Open Government Act (“Woo”) is to replace the Government Information (Public Access) Act (“Wob”). The Woo initiative proposal was passed in the Dutch House of Representatives in 2016; see our earlier Stibbeblog. However, the impact analysis that followed showed that the Woo as proposed was potentially impracticable for local governments. This led to amendments to the bill, which was passed by the House of Representatives on 26 January 2021. 

Read more

13.10.2021 NL law
FAQ: Hoe een begrip uit te leggen als een definitie of andere uitleg ervan in de wettelijke regeling ontbreekt?

Short Reads - Hoe een begrip uit te leggen als een definitie of andere uitleg ervan in de wettelijke regeling ontbreekt? Deze vraag komt meer dan eens aan de orde in geschillen en procedures. De Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State beantwoordt deze vraag onder meer in een uitspraak over pleziervaartuigen en woonschepen in de jachthaven te Kaag (25 augustus 2021, ECLI:NL:RVS:2021:1897).

Read more

20.10.2021 NL law
FAQ: Wat verandert er met de inwerkingtreding van de Woo ten opzichte van de Wob? Een update

Short Reads - De wet open overheid (“Woo”) moet de Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (“Wob”) vervangen. Al in 2016 is het initiatiefvoorstel van de Woo aangenomen in de Tweede Kamer. Hierover kon u eerder een Stibbeblog lezen. De impactanalyse die volgde toonde echter aan dat de Woo zoals voorgesteld mogelijk onuitvoerbaar was voor decentrale overheden. Dit heeft geleid tot wijzigingen in het wetsvoorstel dat op 26 januari 2021 door de Tweede Kamer is aangenomen. 

Read more

13.10.2021 NL law
De hardheidsclausule en ander maatwerk in het licht van de NOW

Short Reads - Uitzonderingen op de NOW zijn volgens de bestuursrechter niet mogelijk door het bewust ontbreken van een hardheidsclausule, maar worden door de minister in bepaalde gevallen wel toegestaan. In dit artikel bespreekt Sandra Putting welke mogelijkheden bestuursorganen en de bestuursrechter hebben om maatwerk te bieden en wordt aan de hand van drie geschilpunten over de NOW beoordeeld hoe die mogelijkheden zijn ingezet of beter hadden kunnen worden ingezet.

Read more

14.10.2021 NL law
Termijn voor het indienen vaststellingsaanvraag NOW-1 loopt af op 31 oktober 2021: strategische handreikingen en juridische aanbevelingen

Short Reads - Op 31 oktober 2021 is het de laatste dag waarop de vaststellingsaanvragen van de NOW-1 subsidie kunnen worden ingediend. Veel werkgevers hebben deze aanvraag al ingediend (en al een vaststellingsbesluit ontvangen) maar ook een aanzienlijk deel van de vaststellingsaanvragen moet nog door het UWV worden ontvangen (zie de Kamerbrief van 20 september 2021). 

Read more

07.10.2021 NL law
Intrekking van natuurvergunningen en de praktijk: de stand van zaken en de rol van significantie van eventuele effecten

Short Reads - Onherroepelijke natuurvergunningen lijken anno 2021 geen rustig bezit meer te zijn. Bij provincies liggen op dit moment verzoeken voor om tot intrekking van (onherroepelijke) natuurvergunningen over te gaan. Intrekking zou een noodzakelijke passende maatregel zijn ter uitvoering van artikel 6, lid 2 Habitatrichtlijn. Jurisprudentie geeft inmiddels enige duidelijkheid. Maar de praktijk blijkt weerbarstig en laat zien dat de nodige vragen onbeantwoord blijven. In dit blog bespreken wij de stand van zaken.

Read more