14 results Promotie Minke Reijneveld Minke Reijneveld promoveert op ‘Gegevensbescherming in faillissement’. Koen de Roo promoveert op "Bestuur van rechtspersonen" Het bestuur is belast met het besturen van de rechtspersoon, behoudens beperkingen volgens de statuten. Deze taak geldt voor het bestuur van elke rechtspersoon. EU Court of Justice ruled on the statute of limitation and scope of applicability of the Damages Directive in Heureka vs. Google In a judgment of 18 April 2024, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) ruled on preliminary questions of the City Court of Prague concerning a damages claim lodged against Google by comparison shopping service provider Heureka. Limitation in case of a deliberately hidden claim Dutch law provides for an extension of the limitation period in relation to claims that were “deliberately hidden” from the creditor (article 3:321 (f) Dutch Civil Code). Consumer law and online ‘order buttons’: Supreme Court takes strict approach with far-reaching consequences The Supreme Court ruled in two cases on the (in)clarity of the text on an order button for online purchases: several buttons did not make it sufficiently clear to consumers that they were entering into a payment obligation. Promotie Pjotr Broere Pjotr Broere, advocaat bij Stibbe, promoveerde op 4 oktober 2022 aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen met zijn proefschrift “De kosten van de enquêteprocedure”. Stibbe advises Uplace Stibbe assists Uplace in one of the biggest all-in-one redevelopment projects ever planned in the Flemish Region. The new sustainability advertising code: lessons from one year of review by the advertising code committee In the first year since the SAC came into force there have been 22 rulings by the ACC and the AT in which an advertisement has been tested against the SAC. This blog addresses the lessons that can be drawn from an analysis of these rulings. Branda Katan and Cas Michiels contributed to Handbook on Mass Damage Branda Katan is one of the handbook’s editors, while Cas Michiels co-authored a chapter on third-party litigation funding. Branda Katan en Cas Michiels dragen bij aan Handboek Massaschade Branda Katan is een van de redacteuren van het Handboek Massaschade. Cas Michiels leverde als co-auteur een bijdrage aan een hoofdstuk over de externe financiering van collectieve acties. Amsterdam District Court rules in Schiphol A-Pier termination case Amsterdam District Court ruled that Schiphol's termination of the A-Pier construction contract was unlawful. Stibbe successfully represented the consortium BN-TAV in the proceedings concerning design responsibility and termination criteria. Vonnis rechtbank Amsterdam in zaak Schiphol over ontbinding A-Pier contract Schiphol mocht aannemingsovereenkomst A-Pier met aannemerscombinatie BN-TAV niet beëindigen. Stibbe stond de BN-TAV met succes bij in deze procedure over ontwerpverantwoordelijkheid en ontbindingscriteria. Repsol: Dutch parent company cannot simply be used as anchor defendant to create jurisdiction Foreign entities are often sued in the Netherlands on the basis of the ‘anchor defendant’ construction. Repsol: Nederlandse moedervennootschap kan niet zomaar als ankergedaagde worden gebruikt om rechtsmacht te creëren Buitenlandse partijen worden vaak in Nederland gedagvaard via de "ankergedaagde"-constructie.
Koen de Roo promoveert op "Bestuur van rechtspersonen" Het bestuur is belast met het besturen van de rechtspersoon, behoudens beperkingen volgens de statuten. Deze taak geldt voor het bestuur van elke rechtspersoon.
EU Court of Justice ruled on the statute of limitation and scope of applicability of the Damages Directive in Heureka vs. Google In a judgment of 18 April 2024, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) ruled on preliminary questions of the City Court of Prague concerning a damages claim lodged against Google by comparison shopping service provider Heureka.
Limitation in case of a deliberately hidden claim Dutch law provides for an extension of the limitation period in relation to claims that were “deliberately hidden” from the creditor (article 3:321 (f) Dutch Civil Code).
Consumer law and online ‘order buttons’: Supreme Court takes strict approach with far-reaching consequences The Supreme Court ruled in two cases on the (in)clarity of the text on an order button for online purchases: several buttons did not make it sufficiently clear to consumers that they were entering into a payment obligation.
Promotie Pjotr Broere Pjotr Broere, advocaat bij Stibbe, promoveerde op 4 oktober 2022 aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen met zijn proefschrift “De kosten van de enquêteprocedure”.
Stibbe advises Uplace Stibbe assists Uplace in one of the biggest all-in-one redevelopment projects ever planned in the Flemish Region.
The new sustainability advertising code: lessons from one year of review by the advertising code committee In the first year since the SAC came into force there have been 22 rulings by the ACC and the AT in which an advertisement has been tested against the SAC. This blog addresses the lessons that can be drawn from an analysis of these rulings.
Branda Katan and Cas Michiels contributed to Handbook on Mass Damage Branda Katan is one of the handbook’s editors, while Cas Michiels co-authored a chapter on third-party litigation funding.
Branda Katan en Cas Michiels dragen bij aan Handboek Massaschade Branda Katan is een van de redacteuren van het Handboek Massaschade. Cas Michiels leverde als co-auteur een bijdrage aan een hoofdstuk over de externe financiering van collectieve acties.
Amsterdam District Court rules in Schiphol A-Pier termination case Amsterdam District Court ruled that Schiphol's termination of the A-Pier construction contract was unlawful. Stibbe successfully represented the consortium BN-TAV in the proceedings concerning design responsibility and termination criteria.
Vonnis rechtbank Amsterdam in zaak Schiphol over ontbinding A-Pier contract Schiphol mocht aannemingsovereenkomst A-Pier met aannemerscombinatie BN-TAV niet beëindigen. Stibbe stond de BN-TAV met succes bij in deze procedure over ontwerpverantwoordelijkheid en ontbindingscriteria.
Repsol: Dutch parent company cannot simply be used as anchor defendant to create jurisdiction Foreign entities are often sued in the Netherlands on the basis of the ‘anchor defendant’ construction.
Repsol: Nederlandse moedervennootschap kan niet zomaar als ankergedaagde worden gebruikt om rechtsmacht te creëren Buitenlandse partijen worden vaak in Nederland gedagvaard via de "ankergedaagde"-constructie.