3012 results Reinier Kooiman Senior Associate Amsterdam Robin Taal Junior Associate (awaiting bar admission) Amsterdam Repsol: Dutch parent company cannot simply be used as anchor defendant to create jurisdiction Foreign entities are often sued in the Netherlands on the basis of the ‘anchor defendant’ construction. Court of Appeal rules on limitation period for follow-on claims under Brazilian law in antitrust damages case concerning the cathode-ray tube markets On 17 June 2025, The Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch rendered a judgment in antitrust follow-on damages litigation concerning the cathode-ray tube markets, ruling on – amongst other things – the commencement of the limitation. Court of Appeal rules on admissibility of antitrust follow-on damages claim under the old Dutch collective action regime The judgment of the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch of 27 May 2025 concerns a collective action brought by Consumentenbond and Stichting Aequitas against Koninklijke Philips N.V. under the old Dutch collective action regime of Article 3:305a DCC. NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about. Dutch Supreme Court refers questions to CJEU in trucks case On 20 June 2025, the Dutch Supreme Court referred questions to the CJEU in an antitrust damages case on trucks manufacturing. This blog explores the events leading to this pivotal moment and the key questions posed. Pjotr Broere Associate Amsterdam Mass Litigation Contact Mass Litigation People Didam II ruling: Stibbe represents an Albert Heijn franchisee at the Supreme Court. Stibbe represented an Albert Heijn franchisee in proceedings against the municipality of Montferland concerning the private sale of the old town hall site in the centre of Didam to a competitor of the franchisee. Netherlands Chapter in The International Comparative Legal Guide Jeroen Smits and Rogier Raas contributed to the International Comparative Legal Guide - Public Investment Funds 2023 in a Q&A chapter about the Netherlands. Stibbe advises Kinepolis Stibbe advises Kinepolis on its acquisition of Landmark cinemas, the second largest movie theatre group in Canada operating 44 movie theaters. Mass Litigation Services & Experience Roos Snell Junior Associate Amsterdam Luxembourg tax authorities clarify the "CIV carve-out" under the reverse hybrid rules On 12 August 2025, the Luxembourg tax authorities issued Circular L.I.R. nº 168quater/2, clarifying the interpretation of the Collective Investment Vehicle carve-out from reverse hybrid rules under Art. 168quater(2) of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law. Stibbe assisted Essendi S.A. with all Luxembourg legal aspects of its financing Stibbe assisted Essendi S.A. with all Luxembourg legal aspects of its financing consisting of bonds issuance for an aggregate amount of €1.250 billion. Claire-Marie Darnand Partner Luxembourg Pagination Previous page Page 165 Page 166 Current page 167 Page 168 Next page
Repsol: Dutch parent company cannot simply be used as anchor defendant to create jurisdiction Foreign entities are often sued in the Netherlands on the basis of the ‘anchor defendant’ construction.
Court of Appeal rules on limitation period for follow-on claims under Brazilian law in antitrust damages case concerning the cathode-ray tube markets On 17 June 2025, The Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch rendered a judgment in antitrust follow-on damages litigation concerning the cathode-ray tube markets, ruling on – amongst other things – the commencement of the limitation.
Court of Appeal rules on admissibility of antitrust follow-on damages claim under the old Dutch collective action regime The judgment of the Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch of 27 May 2025 concerns a collective action brought by Consumentenbond and Stichting Aequitas against Koninklijke Philips N.V. under the old Dutch collective action regime of Article 3:305a DCC.
NFTs: New legal challenges on the horizon In this blog Maciek Bednarski, Annemijn Witkam and Roderik Vrolijk explain what NFTs are and describe some of the legal challenges they will bring about.
Dutch Supreme Court refers questions to CJEU in trucks case On 20 June 2025, the Dutch Supreme Court referred questions to the CJEU in an antitrust damages case on trucks manufacturing. This blog explores the events leading to this pivotal moment and the key questions posed.
Didam II ruling: Stibbe represents an Albert Heijn franchisee at the Supreme Court. Stibbe represented an Albert Heijn franchisee in proceedings against the municipality of Montferland concerning the private sale of the old town hall site in the centre of Didam to a competitor of the franchisee.
Netherlands Chapter in The International Comparative Legal Guide Jeroen Smits and Rogier Raas contributed to the International Comparative Legal Guide - Public Investment Funds 2023 in a Q&A chapter about the Netherlands.
Stibbe advises Kinepolis Stibbe advises Kinepolis on its acquisition of Landmark cinemas, the second largest movie theatre group in Canada operating 44 movie theaters.
Luxembourg tax authorities clarify the "CIV carve-out" under the reverse hybrid rules On 12 August 2025, the Luxembourg tax authorities issued Circular L.I.R. nº 168quater/2, clarifying the interpretation of the Collective Investment Vehicle carve-out from reverse hybrid rules under Art. 168quater(2) of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law.
Stibbe assisted Essendi S.A. with all Luxembourg legal aspects of its financing Stibbe assisted Essendi S.A. with all Luxembourg legal aspects of its financing consisting of bonds issuance for an aggregate amount of €1.250 billion.