Short Reads

ACM established guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements

ACM established guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements

ACM established guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements

02.01.2017 NL law

On 2 December 2016, the Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") adopted guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements, together with an accompanying 'decision tree', providing guidance for conducting an initial assessment of the compatibility of the sustainability initiative with the competition rules.

Sustainability is high on the agenda of both the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and the ACM. In the beginning of October 2016, the Ministry of Economic Affairs published revised policy rules and an explanatory note, introducing specific factors that the ACM must take into account when assessing sustainability arrangements [see our November 2016 newsletter article].

Businesses are increasingly seeking to cooperate in relation to sustainable products or services, for example in the field of public health, animal welfare or fair trade. In order to prevent the hampering of legitimate cooperation between competitors in the area of sustainability – for fear of risking high antitrust fines – the ACM has published three basic principles, which it considers decisive for its enforcement activities in relation to sustainability arrangements:

1. The ACM will not take action when sustainability arrangements are supported by broad social consensus.
2. The ACM may open an investigation following complaints or other signals regarding sustainability arrangements.
3. The ACM will strive to swiftly and effectively resolve any potential concerns.

In practice, businesses should continue to adopt a prudent approach towards cooperating with competitors on sustainability matters. The ACM reserves its right to take action following complaints, even if the sustainability arrangement enjoys broad social support from e.g. the government and other businesses. However, the ACM has shown its willingness to take swift and effective action to address potential concerns by allowing businesses to amend (parts of) a sustainability arrangement without necessarily blocking the initiative or imposing a fine.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of January 2017. Other articles in this newsletter:

1. General Court rules on the concept of a single and continuous infringement in the smart card chips cartel case 
2. Envelope maker's cartel fine annulled in first successful European settlement appeal
3. District Court of Limburg rules that damages claims in the Dutch prestressing steel case are time-barred
4. Belgian Competition Authority confirms that the acquisition by a dominant player of a small competitor is not automatically an abuse of a dominant position

Team

Related news

30.04.2019 EU law
Climate goals and energy targets: legal perspectives

Seminar - On Tuesday April 30th, Stibbe organizes a seminar on climate goals and energy targets. Climate change has incited different international and supranational institutions to issue climate goals and renewable energy targets. Both the UN and the EU have led this movement with various legal instruments.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
Tick-tock: no reset of the appeal clock for amending Commission decision

Short Reads - The European Court of Justice recently upheld the General Court's order finding that metal production and recycling company Eco-Bat had submitted its appeal outside of the appeal term. Eco-Bat had relied on the term starting from the date of the European Commission's decision correcting figures for the fine calculation in the initial infringement decision.

Read more

12.04.2019 NL law
Hoogste Europese rechter bevestigt dat overheden onrechtmatige staatssteun proactief moeten terugvorderen

Short Reads - De maand maart 2019 zal vermoedelijk de juridisch handboeken ingaan als een historische maand voor het mededingings- en staatssteunrecht. Niet alleen deed het Hof van Justitie een baanbrekende uitspraak op het gebied van het verhaal van kartelschade. Het heeft in de uitspraak Eesti Pagar (C-349/17) van 5 maart 2019 belangrijke vragen opgehelderd over de handhaving van het staatssteunrecht op nationaal niveau.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
Fine liability in antitrust cases is closely scrutinised by Dutch courts

Short Reads - A parent company can be held liable for a subsidiary's anti-competitive conduct if the parent has exercised decisive influence over the subsidiary, because the two are then considered a single undertaking. This is why the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (CBb) recently found that the ACM cannot simply rely on managing partners' civil liability to determine fine liability for a limited partnership's anti-competitive conduct.

Read more

10.04.2019 BE law
Acrylamide: zijn frieten ook juridisch schadelijk voor de gezondheid?

Articles - De risico’s door de aanwezigheid van acrylamide in levensmiddelen noopten de EU tot het nemen van risicobeperkende maatregelen. Exploitanten van levensmiddelenbedrijven van bepaalde levensmiddelen (o.a. frieten, chips, koekjes, …) kregen de verplichting om tal van maatregelen te nemen.  De juridische kwalificatie van acrylamide en het regime van deze maatregelen worden in deze blog toegelicht.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring