Short Reads

ACM established guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements

ACM established guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements

ACM established guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements

02.01.2017 EU law

On 2 December 2016, the Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") adopted guiding principles in relation to sustainability arrangements, together with an accompanying 'decision tree', providing guidance for conducting an initial assessment of the compatibility of the sustainability initiative with the competition rules.

Sustainability is high on the agenda of both the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and the ACM. In the beginning of October 2016, the Ministry of Economic Affairs published revised policy rules and an explanatory note, introducing specific factors that the ACM must take into account when assessing sustainability arrangements [see our November 2016 newsletter article].

Businesses are increasingly seeking to cooperate in relation to sustainable products or services, for example in the field of public health, animal welfare or fair trade. In order to prevent the hampering of legitimate cooperation between competitors in the area of sustainability – for fear of risking high antitrust fines – the ACM has published three basic principles, which it considers decisive for its enforcement activities in relation to sustainability arrangements:

1. The ACM will not take action when sustainability arrangements are supported by broad social consensus.
2. The ACM may open an investigation following complaints or other signals regarding sustainability arrangements.
3. The ACM will strive to swiftly and effectively resolve any potential concerns.

In practice, businesses should continue to adopt a prudent approach towards cooperating with competitors on sustainability matters. The ACM reserves its right to take action following complaints, even if the sustainability arrangement enjoys broad social support from e.g. the government and other businesses. However, the ACM has shown its willingness to take swift and effective action to address potential concerns by allowing businesses to amend (parts of) a sustainability arrangement without necessarily blocking the initiative or imposing a fine.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of January 2017. Other articles in this newsletter:

1. General Court rules on the concept of a single and continuous infringement in the smart card chips cartel case 
2. Envelope maker's cartel fine annulled in first successful European settlement appeal
3. District Court of Limburg rules that damages claims in the Dutch prestressing steel case are time-barred
4. Belgian Competition Authority confirms that the acquisition by a dominant player of a small competitor is not automatically an abuse of a dominant position

Team

Related news

10.07.2018 EU law
Hof van Justitie EU oordeelt over reikwijdte 'beroepsgeheim' financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens

Articles - In een arrest van 19 juni 2018 oordeelt de Grote kamer van het Hof van Justitie EU over de reikwijdte van het 'beroepsgeheim' van financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens. Het hof oordeelt dat de informatie die zich in het toezichtsdossier bevindt niet onvoorwaardelijk vertrouwelijk van aard is en bijgevolg onder het beroepsgeheim van de toezichthouder valt. Gegevens die mogelijk commerciële geheimen zijn geweest, worden in beginsel geacht niet meer actueel en dus niet langer geheim te zijn, wanneer die gegevens ten minste vijf jaar oud zijn.

Read more

02.07.2018 EU law
General Court delivers judgments on the scope of dawn raid decisions

Short Reads - On 20 June 2018, the General Court rendered its judgment in two connected appeals submitted by České dráhy, the Czech Railways Operator, challenging two dawn raid decisions by the European Commission. Based on arguments concerning the scope of the investigation, the Court annulled in part the first dawn raid decision and fully upheld the second dawn raid decision.

Read more

29.06.2018 EU law
Un dossier de soumission imparfait peut-il être rectifié par le paiement d’une amende ?

Articles - Dans l’arrêt du 28 février 2018, la Cour de justice donne son avis sur la possibilité pour un soumissionnaire de rectifier, pendant la phase de sélection et moyennant paiement d’une amende, son dossier de soumission imparfait par un ajout et/ou commentaire. La Cour précise que cette mesure n’est, en principe, valable que si la nature de l’irrégularité constatée permet une rectification ultérieure et que le montant de l’amende est proportionnel à l’importance de l’irrégularité constatée. 

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring