Short Reads

Commission publishes Preliminary Report on the e-commerce sector inquiry

Commission publishes Preliminary Report on the e-commerce sector inqu

Commission publishes Preliminary Report on the e-commerce sector inquiry

03.10.2016

Following the launch of the e-commerce sector inquiry in May 2015, the European Commission has now published a Preliminary Report. The report presents the initial results of the Commission's analysis of information gathered from nearly 1800 companies operating in the online sales of consumer goods and digital content.

The report confirms that e-commerce has grown steadily in the EU over the past few years. The rise of e-commerce has led to increased retail activities by manufacturers and an increase in price competition due to a higher level of price transparency. However, some manufacturers have instead tried to mitigate the impact of online sales by including more (online) sales restrictions in their distribution agreements. These restrictions include pricing limitations, bans on selling on online marketplaces, restrictions on cross-border shopping and limitations on the use of price comparison websites. The Commission notes that the report should be "a reason for companies to review their current distribution contracts and bring them in line with EU competition rules if they are not."

In March 2016, the Commission published its initial findings on "geo-blocking", a practice that prevents customers from cross-border shopping because of the customer's location or country of residence [see our April 2016 newsletter]. The Preliminary Report has a broader scope as it also covers licensing rights used by digital content providers and online sales restrictions besides geo-blocking.

In the past, sector inquiries have been followed by enforcement action by the Commission in the  industries concerned. Currently, the Commission is investigating licence agreements between broadcasters and providers of pay-TV services [see also our May 2016 newsletter]. Margrethe Vestager, the European Commissioner  for Competition, said during a press conference in Paris that the information from the sector inquiry may spark further investigations.

The Commission expects to publish a Final Report in the first quarter of 2017. Interested parties can provide their input to the Commission during the public consultation period which lasts until 18 November 2016.

 

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of October 2016. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Court of Justice ends Pilkington's fight against fine in the car glass cartel
  2. General Court upholds Commission's decision that reverse payment settlements constitute a 'by object' infringement
  3. European Commission puts price signalling on the agenda
  4. European Commission orders Ireland to recover illegal tax benefits worth up to €13 billion from Apple
  5. Commission publishes Preliminary Report on the e-commerce sector inquiry
  6. Brussels Court of Appeal confirms interim measures against exclusive TV broadcasting rights

Team

Related news

11.01.2022
2022: the big reveal of 2021’s competition law promises

Short Reads - 2021 was riddled with sneak previews of a “review of competition policy tools with unprecedented scope and ambition”. These sneak previews, alongside 2021’s other competition law developments, seem to point in the direction of a more ‘social’ side to competition law in 2022, as well as looming Big Tech and Big Pharma battles, intensified (international) cooperation, more clarity on merger-related obligations for companies, and shiny new vertical and horizontal block exemption regulations. 2022 will reveal how and when the revised tools will materialise.

Read more

13.12.2021
Een onrechtmatig verkregen klantenlijst mag niet worden gebruikt om klanten van een concurrent af te werven

Articles - Het Hof van beroep te Gent(1) oordeelde dat het actief benaderen van klanten van een concurrent, door gebruik te maken van een onrechtmatig verkregen klantenlijst, onrechtmatige afwerving is en de bedrijfsgeheimen schendt. Het bevel tot staking van deze oneerlijke marktpraktijk strekt zich enkel uit tot de klanten die nog niet afgeworven zijn en moet beperkt zijn in de tijd.

Read more

13.12.2021
Publicité comparative des prix : prétendre faussement d’avoir le prix le plus bas est une pratique commerciale déloyale, mais être un concurrent et parler négativement de cette pratique à des tiers l'est aussi

Articles - Le Président du tribunal de commerce d'Anvers(1) a ordonné la cessation d'une publicité comparative illicite suggérant que l'entreprise offre un prix globalement plus avantageux, tant par rapport au marché dans son ensemble que par rapport à un concurrent spécifique. La critique par le concurrent de cette pratique publicitaire à l'égard d'un fournisseur commun est considérée comme du badinage et a également dû être abandonnée.

Read more