Annotatie onder Hoge Raad - 26 september 2014

Annotatie onder Hoge Raad - 26 september 2014

Annotatie onder Hoge Raad - 26 september 2014

26.09.2014 NL law

Europese exequatur. De EEX-Vo is materieel van toepassing op de erkenning en tenuitvoerlegging in Nederland van een civielrechtelijke veroordeling in een vonnis van de Belgische strafrechter. In de procedure ter erkenning en tenuitvoerlegging hoeven geen andere documenten te worden overgelegd dan de documenten genoemd in de art. 53-55 EEX-Vo en de verzoeker is niet verplicht om de wederpartij te informeren over het indienen van het verzoek.

De wederpartij hoeft pas te worden geïnformeerd zodra het verlof is verleend en kan vervolgens het rechtsmiddel van art. 43 EEX-Vo instellen. Op het instellen van dit rechtsmiddel in Nederland zijn de bepalingen over de verzoekschriftprocedure (art. 261-291 Rv) van toepassing, tenzij de wet of de EEX-Vo zich daartegen verzet.

Daniël Stein schreef de annotatie bij deze uitspraak. Deze annotatie is gepubliceerd in JBPR 2015/4.

Lees de volledige annotatie.

Related news

11.04.2019 NL law
Double roles in attributing knowledge

Short Reads - The knowledge of a person who in fact runs a company can be attributed to the company if the sole director and shareholder is a 'straw man', the Supreme Court confirmed in a judgment of 29 March 2019. The rules by the Supreme Court are not revolutionary or even new. But circumstances essential for the attribution of knowledge are ignored. The double role played by the 'man in charge' raises questions about how to apply the rules as identified by the Supreme Court to the facts

Read more

28.03.2019 NL law
European Parliament votes in favour of representative actions for consumers

Short Reads - On 26 March 2019 the European Parliament approved an amended version of the European Commission's proposal for a Directive on representative actions for the protection of collective interests of consumers, following a debate on 25 March 2019. The Directive will become law once the Council and the European Parliament reach an agreement on the European Commission's proposal. The Council has not yet been able to adopt a position on the Directive, meaning that the Directive will most likely be considered again after the ­­­European elections in May 2019 by a different European Parliament

Read more

10.04.2019 NL law
Damage due to a defective driveway and the Dutch twenty year limitation period: When does limitation start in case of a continuous event that causes damage?

Short Reads - On 22 March 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:412) that the strict liability for buildings (opstalaansprakelijkheid) is not linked to a specific damaging act but to a damaging condition, as referred to in section 6:174 DCC. Therefore, there is no reason to regard a damaging act as an 'event that caused damage' as referred to in section 3:310 DCC concerning the limitation period for claims for damages.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
European Court of Justice: actio pauliana is covered by jurisdiction rule of forum of contract. A judgment with foreseeable consequences?

Short Reads - Imagine that a debtor voluntarily concludes a transaction with a third party where he knows (or should know) that it hinders the creditor's possibilities of collecting the debt. In civil law countries, a creditor can invoke the nullification of that legal act by means of a so-called actio pauliana. This raises the question of which court has jurisdiction in the case of an international dispute, regarding an actio pauliana, that is instituted by a creditor against a third party?

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring