Articles

Press offence before the Assise Court

Press offence before the Assise Court

Press offence before the Assise Court

17.12.2014

For only the second time since World War II, the Brussels’ Chamber of Indictment has referred a press offence to be trialed by a jury, before the Assise Court. 

A press offence is any abuse of the freedom of expression such as libel and slander (Article 383 of the Belgian Criminal Code); written insult (Art. 448 BCC); or obscene or indecent writings (Art. 383 BCC) that is committed by using the (printing) press and which is made public. A press offence is therefore only distinct from other offences, in the way that it is committed through the press. According to the Supreme Court, the criminal expression of an idea or opinion through printed and published writings constitutes a press offence.

Article 150 of the Belgian Constitution provides that all press offences, except for those which are inspired by racism or xenophobia should be trialed by jury.

However, since 1941 only one case of a press offence has been trialed by the Assise Court. Usually, the Court’s Chamber of Indictment finds that the conditions for a press offence have not been fulfilled, in which case the matter is dealt with by the correctional courts, or that the case has been statute-barred. Not so in this case.

The facts concern a university professor who has sent allegedly libelous e-mails to other members of the faculty about one of his colleagues. This colleague subsequently filed charges for libel and slander. Where usually such cases are dealt with by the correctional courts or even the civil courts, in this case the defendant argued that it concerned a press offence and that it should therefore be dealt with by a jury trial. The Court’s Chamber of Indictment confirmed this and referred the case to the Court of Assise. Following the judgment of the Chamber of Indictment, the prosecutor will now have to schedule the case on the Assise Court’s agenda.

 

Click here to see a printable version of this article

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

20.09.2022 EU law
Launch of Metaverse blog series

Articles - Stibbe launches a new blog series focusing on the legal challenges of the Metaverse. In our upcoming blog posts, we will discuss the legal challenges of NFTs, crypto-assets, Metaverse platforms, crypto exchanges, DAO, and many more.

Read more

28.07.2022 NL law
Zuiver commercieel belang ook gerechtvaardigd belang: Raad van State laat zich er niet over uit

Short Reads - Op 27 juli 2022 heeft de Raad van State bevestigd dat de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens onterecht een boete van € 575.000 aan VoetbalTV heeft opgelegd. De hoop bestond dat de Afdeling antwoord zou geven op de vraag of de AP terecht of onterecht meent dat een zuiver commercieel belang géén gerechtvaardigd belang kan zijn in de zin van de Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming. Het antwoord op deze vraag blijft echter uit.  

Read more

28.07.2022 NL law
Purely commercial interest also a legitimate interest? Council of State leaves the question unanswered.

Short Reads - On 27 July 2022, the Council of State confirmed that the Dutch Data Protection Authority wrongly imposed a €575,000 fine on VoetbalTV. But the Council did not answer the question whether the AP rightly or wrongly believes that a purely commercial interest cannot be a legitimate interest within the meaning of the General Data Protection Regulation.

Read more