Articles

Press offence before the Assise Court

Press offence before the Assise Court

Press offence before the Assise Court

17.12.2014

For only the second time since World War II, the Brussels’ Chamber of Indictment has referred a press offence to be trialed by a jury, before the Assise Court. 

A press offence is any abuse of the freedom of expression such as libel and slander (Article 383 of the Belgian Criminal Code); written insult (Art. 448 BCC); or obscene or indecent writings (Art. 383 BCC) that is committed by using the (printing) press and which is made public. A press offence is therefore only distinct from other offences, in the way that it is committed through the press. According to the Supreme Court, the criminal expression of an idea or opinion through printed and published writings constitutes a press offence.

Article 150 of the Belgian Constitution provides that all press offences, except for those which are inspired by racism or xenophobia should be trialed by jury.

However, since 1941 only one case of a press offence has been trialed by the Assise Court. Usually, the Court’s Chamber of Indictment finds that the conditions for a press offence have not been fulfilled, in which case the matter is dealt with by the correctional courts, or that the case has been statute-barred. Not so in this case.

The facts concern a university professor who has sent allegedly libelous e-mails to other members of the faculty about one of his colleagues. This colleague subsequently filed charges for libel and slander. Where usually such cases are dealt with by the correctional courts or even the civil courts, in this case the defendant argued that it concerned a press offence and that it should therefore be dealt with by a jury trial. The Court’s Chamber of Indictment confirmed this and referred the case to the Court of Assise. Following the judgment of the Chamber of Indictment, the prosecutor will now have to schedule the case on the Assise Court’s agenda.

 

Click here to see a printable version of this article

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

Team

Related news

17.05.2022 EU law
Digital Law Up(to)date: Art. 17 of directive 2019/790 is valid!

Articles - The CJEU validates the new liability regime for large online platforms organised by article 17 of the directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market. The action was brought by the Republic of Poland to annul a part of article 17 as it is contrary to the right to freedom of expression.

Read more

11.05.2022 NL law
De afweging van grondrechten in het kader van corona

Articles - COVID-19 heeft de maatschappij voor dilemma’s geplaatst bij de afweging van volksgezondheid en bescherming van kwetsbaren tegenover vrijheden van het individu. In Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsrecht in Context schetsen Frederiek Fernhout en Judica Krikke de onderliggende rechten en vrijheden die vastgelegd zijn in het Europese grondrechtenkader, de AVG en nationale arbeidswetgeving en bespreken zij hoe deze tegen elkaar moeten worden afgewogen in de context van coronamaatregelen.

Read more

26.04.2022 EU law
Digital Law Up(to)date: Further clarification by the CJEU on the retention of traffic and location electronic communications data for the purpose of combating serious crime

Articles - On 5 April 2022, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union first confirmed that EU law precludes national legislative measures which provide, as a preventative measure, for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data relating to electronic communications, for the purpose of combating serious crime.

Read more