626 results Marlene Helderman Staff Associate (not admitted to the bar) Amsterdam Charlotte Conings Senior Associate Brussels Freya Trouw Associate Amsterdam Amsterdam District Court rules in Schiphol A-Pier termination case Amsterdam District Court ruled that Schiphol's termination of the A-Pier construction contract was unlawful. Stibbe successfully represented the consortium BN-TAV in the proceedings concerning design responsibility and termination criteria. Vonnis rechtbank Amsterdam in zaak Schiphol over ontbinding A-Pier contract Schiphol mocht aannemingsovereenkomst A-Pier met aannemerscombinatie BN-TAV niet beëindigen. Stibbe stond de BN-TAV met succes bij in deze procedure over ontwerpverantwoordelijkheid en ontbindingscriteria. Margie Parker-Breugem Senior Associate Amsterdam Roos Gomes Junior Associate Amsterdam Ingmar de Groot Partner Amsterdam Stibbe advises Schneider Electric Industries SAS Stibbe has advised Schneider Electric Industries SAS, the market leader in the digital transformation of energy management and automation, on its successful expansion of its investment in Planon Beheer B.V. Repsol: Dutch parent company cannot simply be used as anchor defendant to create jurisdiction Foreign entities are often sued in the Netherlands on the basis of the ‘anchor defendant’ construction. Repsol: Nederlandse moedervennootschap kan niet zomaar als ankergedaagde worden gebruikt om rechtsmacht te creëren Buitenlandse partijen worden vaak in Nederland gedagvaard via de "ankergedaagde"-constructie. No reduction order for Shell on appeal: what does this mean? Shell climate case on appeal: no CO2 reduction order. What does this mean for the future? And for other companies? Geen reductiebevel voor Shell in hoger beroep: wat betekent dit? Hoger beroep Shell-klimaatzaak: geen CO2-reductiebevel. Wat betekent dit voor de toekomst? En voor andere bedrijven? Stibbe advises Strohm Stibbe advised Strohm Holding on another EUR 15 million joint investment. Pagination Previous page Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Current page 35
Amsterdam District Court rules in Schiphol A-Pier termination case Amsterdam District Court ruled that Schiphol's termination of the A-Pier construction contract was unlawful. Stibbe successfully represented the consortium BN-TAV in the proceedings concerning design responsibility and termination criteria.
Vonnis rechtbank Amsterdam in zaak Schiphol over ontbinding A-Pier contract Schiphol mocht aannemingsovereenkomst A-Pier met aannemerscombinatie BN-TAV niet beëindigen. Stibbe stond de BN-TAV met succes bij in deze procedure over ontwerpverantwoordelijkheid en ontbindingscriteria.
Stibbe advises Schneider Electric Industries SAS Stibbe has advised Schneider Electric Industries SAS, the market leader in the digital transformation of energy management and automation, on its successful expansion of its investment in Planon Beheer B.V.
Repsol: Dutch parent company cannot simply be used as anchor defendant to create jurisdiction Foreign entities are often sued in the Netherlands on the basis of the ‘anchor defendant’ construction.
Repsol: Nederlandse moedervennootschap kan niet zomaar als ankergedaagde worden gebruikt om rechtsmacht te creëren Buitenlandse partijen worden vaak in Nederland gedagvaard via de "ankergedaagde"-constructie.
No reduction order for Shell on appeal: what does this mean? Shell climate case on appeal: no CO2 reduction order. What does this mean for the future? And for other companies?
Geen reductiebevel voor Shell in hoger beroep: wat betekent dit? Hoger beroep Shell-klimaatzaak: geen CO2-reductiebevel. Wat betekent dit voor de toekomst? En voor andere bedrijven?