Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Expertise
  • Publications & Insights
  • People
  • Careers

Secondary navigation

  • Value added services
  • CSR
  • About us

SearchSearch results for: “”

448 results

Ingmar de Groot

Partner Amsterdam

Tom Barkhuysen

Partner Amsterdam

Tom Barkhuysen

Partner Amsterdam

Stibbe successfully represents EY in a class action regarding Airbus

In a landmark judgment of 23 December, the Appeal Court of The Hague ruled that the claims of a claim foundation brought against Airbus, its former directors and its external auditor are inadmissible.

Noera Al Salman

Associate Amsterdam

Robin Tess Bolland

Associate Amsterdam

Roos Gomes

Associate Amsterdam

Emilie Hoebens

Associate Amsterdam

Marlene Helderman

Staff Associate (not admitted to the bar) Amsterdam

Monique van der Linden

Counsel Amsterdam

Monique van der Linden

Counsel Amsterdam

No reduction order for Shell on appeal: what does this mean?

Shell climate case on appeal: no CO2 reduction order. What does this mean for the future? And for other companies?

Geen reductiebevel voor Shell in hoger beroep: wat betekent dit?

Hoger beroep Shell-klimaatzaak: geen CO2-reductiebevel. Wat betekent dit voor de toekomst? En voor andere bedrijven?

Stibbe advises Strohm

Stibbe advised Strohm Holding on another EUR 15 million joint investment.

Climate case Milieudefensie et al. – The Hague District Court orders Shell to reduce CO2 emissions

On May 26, 2021, the District Court of The Hague rendered its judgment in the case between Milieudefensie and others against Shell.

Klimaatzaak Milieudefensie e.a. – rechtbank beveelt Shell te zorgen voor CO2-reductie

Op 26 mei 2021 deed de rechtbank Den Haag uitspraak in de zaak tussen Milieudefensie e.a. tegen Shell. Een multidisciplinair team van Stibbe geeft in dit blog haar eerste visie op deze uitspraak en legt uit waarom dit een baanbrekende uitspraak kan zijn.

Stibbe advises BP

Stibbe successfully acted as counsel for BP in proceedings before the Dutch courts and the CJEU.

WAMCA: imperfections come to the surface

Dutch courts have not yet developed procedural rules for the WAMCA, the new Dutch regime for collective redress. This adds to pre-existing uncertainty around many procedural aspects of this new law.

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • Page 19
  • Current page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Next page
Reset filters
Date
Content type
  • Article (195)
  • Event (12)
  • Inside Stibbe (18)
  • Interview (1)
  • Matter (121)
  • Podcast (6)
  • People (95)
Expertise
  • (-) Litigation and Arbitration (434)
  • (-) Mass Litigation (92)
  • Audit Firms and Accountancy (81)
  • Banking and Finance (426)
  • Capital Markets (250)
  • Compliance, Sanctions and Risk (165)
  • Corporate and M&A (884)
  • Corporate Investigations (31)
  • Criminal Law and Enforcement (145)
  • Employment, Benefits and Pensions (401)
  • Energy, Industry and Climate (315)
  • Environment and Planning (924)
  • ESG & Sustainability (329)
  • EU and Competition Law (464)
  • Financial Regulation (177)
  • Healthcare and Life Sciences (79)
  • Infrastructure and Mobility (201)
  • Insurance (36)
  • Intellectual Property (110)
  • Investment Funds (136)
  • Privacy and Data Protection (187)
  • Private Equity (199)
  • Procurement Law (111)
  • Public Law (1206)
  • Real Estate (478)
  • Restructuring and Insolvency (114)
  • Sports (24)
  • Tax (454)
  • Tech (195)
  • Technology, Media and Telecommunications (318)
  • Unfair Competition and Consumer Protection (154)
Jurisdiction
  • BE Law (48)
  • EU Law (50)
  • LU Law (4)
  • NL Law (296)
Language
  • Dutch (96)
  • English (349)
  • French (3)

Footer main navigation

  • Expertise
  • Publications & Insights
  • People
  • Careers
© 2026 Stibbe

Footer navigation

  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • General Conditions
  • Register of legal practice areas
  • Privacy and Cookie Policy
  • Important Information