Neodyum Miknatis
amateur porn
implant
olabahis
Casino Siteleri
Kayseri escort
canli poker siteleri kolaybet meritslot
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
Articles

Luxembourg tax measures on non-cooperative jurisdictions: EU blacklist updated

Luxembourg tax measures on non-cooperative jurisdictions: EU blacklist

Luxembourg tax measures on non-cooperative jurisdictions: EU blacklist updated

07.10.2020 LU law

On 6 October 2020, the European Union list of non-cooperative jurisdictions (the “EU List") was updated. The changes have an impact on bill of law nº 7547, providing that, as from 1 January 2021, interest or royalties, accrued or paid, should no longer be deductible for tax purposes when the beneficiary is a related enterprise established in a country included in the EU List.

​On 30 March 2020, the Luxembourg Government has submitted bill of law nº 7547 (the “Bill") providing that, as from 1 January 2021, interest or royalties, accrued or paid, should not be deductible for tax purposes when the beneficiary is a related enterprise established in a country included in the EU List. ​

Under the Bill, the non-deductibility of interest and royalties, to be introduced through the amendment of article 168 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law, should not apply where the Luxembourg company demonstrates that the transaction pursuant to which interest and royalties are paid is implemented for valid commercial reasons that reflect economic reality.

On 6 October 2020, the Council of the EU decided to remove Cayman Islands and Oman from the EU List, further to the implementation of specific measures by these jurisdictions.

Anguilla and Barbados were however added to the EU List following peer review reports published by the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes.

As of today, the Bill is still going through the legislative process[1] with a final vote expected before the end of the year. Arrangements involving Cayman entities should thus no longer be concerned by the upcoming measures, as long as the Cayman Islands remain excluded from the EU list. These measures will continue to impact structures where a Luxembourg taxpayer owes interest or royalties to a related enterprise which is tax resident in American Samoa, Anguilla, Barbados, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, the U.S. Virgin Islands or Vanuatu.

For previous reporting and further details on the Bill, please see our newsflash of 3 April 2020.


[1] The most recent development being the Avis du Conseil d'État, dated 16 June 2020.​

Team

Related news

05.11.2020 NL law
Belgian prohibition on abuse of economic dependence comes into force and new fining guidelines

Short Reads - In 2019, Belgium introduced legislation banning abuse in relationships between companies where there is no dominant position, but rather a position of economic dependence. The act entered into force on 22 August 2020. This category of restrictive practice applies alongside the existing prohibitions on cartels and abuse of a dominant position. It opens up new opportunities but also new threats for companies that are not in a dominant position.

Read more

05.11.2020 NL law
Jurisdictional hide & seek: merger thresholds and buyer joint ventures

Short Reads - Companies beware: the turnover of a joint venture buying a target is not necessarily decisive for determining whether the EU merger thresholds are met. The General Court fully upheld the Commission’s 2017 decision prohibiting the joint acquisition of Cemex’s Hungarian and Croatian subsidiaries by cement companies HeidelbergCement and Schwen Zement through their full-function joint venture (JV).

Read more

11.11.2020 EU law
Innovatie en staatssteun. Het CBb leidt de weg bij de belangrijke definities industrieel onderzoek en experimentele ontwikkeling

Short Reads - Het College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (“CBb”) heeft op 6 oktober 2020 in een subsidiegeschil nadere invulling gegeven aan het onderscheid tussen “industrieel onderzoek” en “experimentele ontwikkeling”. Dit onderscheid staat centraal in nationale subsidieregelingen en Europese staatssteunregels die overheidsinvesteringen in onderzoek, ontwikkeling en innovatie (“O&O&I”) mogelijk moeten maken.

Read more

05.11.2020 NL law
General Court confirms: no proof, no dawn raid

Short Reads - The Commission should think twice before conducting a dawn raid. The General Court partially annulled three Commission decisions ordering dawn raids at the premises of French supermarkets for a lack of sufficiently strong evidence with regard to one of the suspected anticompetitive practices. In addition, the General Court clarified that interviews held with suppliers prior to the issuing of a dawn raid decision can be used as evidence, even when these interviews have not been recorded.

Read more