umraniye escort pendik escort
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
bodrum escort
Short Reads

Will the COVID-19 pandemic have an impact on financial covenants?

Will the COVID-19 pandemic have an impact on financial covenants?

Will the COVID-19 pandemic have an impact on financial covenants?

31.03.2020 BE law

In the Benelux and wider European market, many leveraged credit agreements still include certain financial covenants (including leverage covenants, interest and cashflow covers, etc.). All of these covenants rely (directly or indirectly) on the operational performance of a company (EBITDA). As it is expected that the coronavirus outbreak will negatively affect the operations of companies in a wide variety of sectors, any consequent breaches of financial covenants are likely inevitable.

To avoid or resolve covenant breaches, borrowers and sponsors could consider the following possible steps:

  1. Check your definitions – In case of a potential covenant breach, take a close look at your financing documentation and the relevant definitions used therein. Make sure that you have used all available add-backs (and pro forma application thereof), exceptions and exclusions – upon a recalculation, a covenant breach can be averted.
  2. Evaluate prepayment possibilities and equity cures – Depending on the situation, a voluntary prepayment of an amortising facility at the right time may prevent a covenant breach. Another solution to decrease (net) debt or (as the case may be, if so agreed) increase EBITDA is for the sponsor to inject additional equity. It should be noted however that an equity injection is typically only made after the covenant breach occurred, as a way to cure the breach, rather than to prevent it. How the cure amount is actually applied (towards debt or EBITDA) and whether there are limitations or any other conditions to the cure, will be set out in the financing documentation.
  3. Covenant waiver – Borrowers with an expected one-off financial covenant breach may seek a simple waiver of that breach. Depending on the financing documentation, a waiver will require (at least) majority lender consent. Additionally, a waiver fee might have to be paid. Please take into account that lenders, and their internal organisation, are also subject to the effects of the coronavirus, which could delay response times. Consequently, entering into discussions with the lender(s) on a timely basis is key.
  4. Covenant reset – If the borrower anticipates multiple and continuous covenant breaches due to the impact of the coronavirus, it could be useful to discuss a covenant reset with the lenders, to avoid having to ask for subsequent waivers. When considering a request for a covenant reset, lenders will likely require seeing an updated plan and financial model. It goes without saying that a reset process will take substantially more time than a waiver request. Additionally, when renegotiating the covenant levels, lenders may request in turn an amendment to other terms of your financing documentation, or implement other protective features (think of a cash sweep, amortisation or even pricing terms). Here too, an amendment fee might have to be paid. Finally, note that, since the length of the coronavirus pandemic is still unknown, lenders may be reluctant to renegotiate an agreement without having a view on the total financial impact the pandemic will have on the borrower.


More about the coronavirus

You can read more publications on the impact of the coronavirus on our website. Here you will also find a list of contacts within our office who can advise you with questions about the implications of the coronavirus for your company.


This article provides some general insights on different legal questions. These insights do not constitute legal advice and may not be relied upon as if they were legal advice. The outcome of any legal analysis will strongly depend both on the specific facts and circumstances of each case and on the particularities of the sector and legal relationship involved. Our legal experts in the various domains concerned are available to assist you with the analysis of your questions and provide specific advice tailored to your case and circumstances.


Related news

12.03.2021 LU law
Stibbe Luxembourg lawyers co-author the SFDR Implementation Guide

Articles - Edouard d'Anterroches, Audrey Jarreton and Nicolas Pradel co-authored the SFDR Implementation Guide published on 9 March 2021 by the Association des Banques et Banquiers, Luxembourg (ABBL), the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI) and the Association des Companies d’Assurances et de Réassurances (ACA) for the use of their members.

Read more

24.02.2021 NL law
How certain elements of the Dutch scheme may (or may not) affect ISDA Master Agreements

Articles - On 1 January 2021, the legislative framework for court-approved restructurings of debts outside formal insolvency proceedings (hereafter referred to as the ‘Dutch scheme’, or simply, the ‘scheme’) entered into force. Under the Dutch scheme a debt restructuring plan can be submitted to the creditors for voting, whereby a majority can bind a minority within each class of creditors and the competent court has the power to make the plan binding on dissenting classes of creditors.

Read more

11.03.2021 NL law
Financial Regulatory – Update Q1 2021

Short Reads - Traditionally, 1 January (and 1 July) each year is a date on which new Dutch financial regulations enter into force. This year, the amendments to the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht – “Wft”) are relatively few, but other notable developments are worthy of attention.

Read more

22.02.2021 EU law
EU Regulator’s response to the Reddit rally

Short Reads - A massive stock market rally recently suddenly developed with respect to GameStop’s shares, a moribund chain of video game stores in the United States. The instigators: users of the investment forum r/wallstreetbets on Reddit. On 17 February 2021, the European Securities and Markets Authority delivered its strongest warning yet about the risks of using social media for investing, cautioning that any effort to coordinate trades online could violate EU market abuse regulations.

Read more