Short Reads

Wanted: fast solutions for fast-growing platforms

Wanted: fast solutions for fast-growing platforms

Wanted: fast solutions for fast-growing platforms

05.09.2019 NL law

Dominant digital companies be warned: calls for additional tools to deal with powerful platforms in online markets are increasing. Even though the need for speed is a given in these fast-moving markets, the question of which tool is best-suited for the job remains. Different countries are focusing on different areas; the Dutch ACM wants to pre-emptively strike down potential anti-competitive conduct with ex ante measures, while the UK CMA aims for greater regulation of digital markets and a quick fix through interim orders.

The joint proposal by the French, German and Polish governments suggests swifter interim measures, specific scrutiny for major digital platforms and behavioural remedies. The G7 Competition Authorities are calling for closer international cooperation and convergence in the application of competition rules. Digital companies may therefore soon have to reckon with special regimes and interim or ex ante behavioural measures, supplementing the current scrutiny.

The vast number of possible enforcement tools suggested by governments, experts and competition authorities is aimed at keeping pace with the dynamics of online markets. Around the same time as the publication of the European Commission's expert panel report on competition policy for the digital era (see our May 2019 Newsletter) and the UK government's digital expert panel report, a Franco-German manifesto, alongside a call from the Dutch government for additional tools to regulate tech giants, was published (see our June 2019 Newsletter). These initiatives have now been supplemented with the ACM's support of the Dutch government's call for additional tools, the launch of the CMA's digital markets strategy, a joint proposal by France, Germany and Poland, and a common understanding of G7 competition authorities on competition and the digital economy.

All of these suggestions and initiatives recognise the need for competition authorities to have the ability to swiftly correct anti-competitive conduct by powerful online platforms with, for instance, interim measures. The ACM even suggests an ex ante tool, giving competition authorities the possibility to intervene with proportionate behavioural remedies before any competition law infringement has been established. Others suggest a specific regulatory framework to which major digital platforms should adhere. Most agree that data sharing, platform access and data portability should form part of the solution and that any solution should have support at least EU-wide, but ideally also internationally, considering that major online platforms usually operate on a global scale.

It remains to be seen how the incoming European Commission will take things forward. For now, dominant digital companies are forewarned of imminent changes and advised to monitor on-going developments including the CMA's market study into online platforms and the digital advertising market, the ACM's investigation into Apple's App Store (see our May 2019 newsletter), Spotify's complaint against Apple with the European Commission and the European Commission's investigation into Amazon's use of data from independent retailers who sell on its marketplace.

 

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of September 2019. Other articles in this newsletter:

 

Team

Related news

02.04.2020 NL law
ACM played high stakes and lost: no more fixed network access regulation

Short Reads - The ACM’s failure to meet the requisite standard of proof has led to the fixed networks of Dutch telecom providers KPN and VodafoneZiggo being free from access regulation. The Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ruled that the ACM had failed to demonstrate the existence of collective dominance, and that KPN and VodafoneZiggo would tacitly coordinate their behaviour absent regulation.

Read more

26.03.2020 BE law
​I am suffering significant financial losses as a result of the spread of the corona virus. Is there a possibility of State aid?

Short Reads - COVID-19 brings certain questions to centre stage regarding State aid. In this short read, Peter Wytinck, Sophie Van Besien and Michèle de Clerck discuss the possibility of State aid in case of significant financial losses as a result of the spread of the corona virus.

Read more

02.04.2020 NL law
Claims assigned to a litigation vehicle: who needs to prove what?

Short Reads - Two recent decisions from the Amsterdam Court of Appeal have confirmed that litigation vehicles cannot come empty-handed to the court, and should provide documentation regarding the assignments of claims they submit. The Dutch legal system allows companies and individuals to assign their claims to a “litigation vehicle” or “claims vehicle” that bundles those claims into a single action. In its decisions of 10 March 2020, the Court of Appeal ruled that it is up to litigation vehicles to prove that the assignments can be invoked against the debtor. 

Read more

10.03.2020 NL law
De AVG staat niet in de weg aan de verwerking van persoonsgegevens door een toezichthouder tijdens een bedrijfsbezoek

Short Reads - Bedrijven die met toezicht worden geconfronteerd, zijn gehouden op verzoek van een toezichthouder in beginsel alle informatie te verstrekken. Met de komst van de Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (AVG) is in de praktijk de vraag opgekomen of een toezichthouder bevoegd is om persoonsgegevens die onderdeel uitmaken van de gevraagde informatie te verwerken.

Read more

02.04.2020 NL law
EU competition policy agenda: full to the brim

Short Reads - The European Commission’s competition policy agenda stretches to 2024 and contains plans for many new or revised rules and guidelines. Recent publications, such as the New Industrial Strategy for Europe, shed more light on the Commission’s initiatives and their possible impact on parties from both inside and outside the European Union (EU). These new initiatives include temporary state aid rules to address the effects of the Corona crisis, consultations on the Block Exemption Regulations, and new measures in respect of (primarily) third-country companies.

Read more

05.03.2020 NL law
CBb confirms: no cartel fine, still interest to appeal cartel decision

Short Reads - Companies can challenge a decision establishing that they committed a competition law violation, even if no fine was imposed on them. The CBb – the highest court for public enforcement of cartel cases – recently confirmed that the absence of a fine does not affect a company’s interest to appeal. Consequently, parent companies held liable for a subsidiary’s cartel infringement can still challenge a cartel decision, irrespective of whether fines were imposed on them separately.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring