Short Reads

Legislative proposal on mass damages claims approved by the Dutch Senate

Legislative proposal on mass damages claims approved by the Dutch Sen

Legislative proposal on mass damages claims approved by the Dutch Senate

21.03.2019 NL law

On 19 March 2019, the Dutch Senate approved the legislative proposal that introduces collective actions for damages under article 3:305a of the Dutch Civil Code (DCC). As the legislative proposal did not give rise to any debate in the Senate, it was passed without a vote.

The legislative proposal will have a significant impact on the litigation climate in the Netherlands (and arguably in the rest of Europe). It broadens the scope of article 3:305a DCC so as to enable collective actions for monetary damages on an "opt-out" basis, which is currently not possible. The legislative proposal further includes provisions that are intended to introduce checks and balances to prevent unmeritorious litigation and provisions that are intended to enhance the efficiency of the proceedings. For more detailed information regarding the legislative proposal see the previously published Overview of the Legislative Proposal on Collective Action by Jeroen Kortmann and our earlier blog Legislative proposal for mass damages claims approved by the Dutch House of Representatives.

Once enacted, the legislative proposal will be known as the Act on the Resolution of Mass Claims in Collective Action (Wet Afwikkeling Massaschade in Collectieve Actie) (WAMCA). The date of entry into force of the WAMCA is still to be announced, but is expected to be 1 July 2019. The WAMCA will apply to collective actions for damages initiated on or after the date of its entry into force that relate to "events" that occurred on or after 15 November 2016 (the day the draft legislative proposal was submitted to the Dutch House of Representatives). The current and more limited scope of article 3:305a DCC will continue to apply to actions that relate to events that took place before 15 November 2016.

To stay updated on the developments with regard to collective actions for mass damages in the Netherlands, please visit our Stibbe website.

Team

Related news

04.07.2019 NL law
Audit firms and accountant's duty of care towards third parties

Short Reads - The Dutch Supreme Court recently decided (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:744) that the standard for audit firms' and accountants' duty of care towards third parties is in essence no different than the general duty of care under Dutch tort law, and ultimately depends on the circumstances of the case. However, the role of accountants in society, their responsibility to serve the general interest, and rules of professional conduct and practice play an important role.

Read more

27.06.2019 NL law
Stibbe launches website about Digital Economy

Inside Stibbe - Stibbe's Digital Economy group published a new website this week: Stibbedigital.com With this new website we aim to view technological developments including artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, the Internet of Things, smart mobility and the rise of digital platforms from a legal perspective.

Read more

01.07.2019 BE law
HvJ: nationale rechter dient toe te zien op de naleving van de verplichtingen inzake luchtkwaliteit

Articles - Bij arrest van 25 juni 2019 (C-723/17) deed het Hof van Justitie uitspraak over enkele prejudiciële vragen, voorgelegd door de Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel, over de toepassing van de Europese Luchtkwaliteitsrichtlijn (2008/50/EG). Het Hof kent in zijn arrest de nationale rechter een belangrijke taak toe bij de correcte implementatie en afdwinging van de Luchtkwaliteitsrichtlijn. 

Read more

20.06.2019 NL law
Stibbe advises Westermeerwind

Inside Stibbe - The District Court Midden-Nederland ruled in favour of Westermeerwind B.V. on 19 June, in a case brought by organisations acting for the 'Westermeerwind Group'. The group had claimed that the 32 members of that group had the right to participate in the Windpark Westermeerwind at a much lower price than other participants, and with a different corporate structure.

Read more

04.06.2019 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court clarifies evidentiary rules concerning signatures and signed documents

Short Reads - In two recent decisions, the Dutch Supreme Court has clarified the evidentiary power of signed documents. If the signatory unambiguously denies that the signature on the document is his or hers or claims that another party has tampered with the signature (for instance, through forgery or copying a signature from one document and pasting it in another), it is up to the party invoking the signed document to prove the signature's authenticity (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:572).

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring