Short Reads

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

01.03.2018 NL law

On 1 February 2018, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) published a position paper setting out its strategy in relation to market dominance of internet and technology companies. The position paper confirms that the ACM will focus on digital markets and closely monitor developments in this area.

The ACM highlights the following three pillars of its strategy with regard to digital markets:

  1. Invest in knowledge on the functioning of digital markets. The ACM intends to invest in obtaining knowledge on the functioning of digital markets.

  2. Active monitoring of the market. The ACM will continue to closely monitor developments in the market so that it can act in a timely and accurate manner. At the same time, the ACM recognizes that technological innovation in digital markets is important for competitive dynamics, which it does not want to disrupt.

  3. Focus on international and national cooperation. Finally, the ACM will actively cooperate with international and national authorities in this sector. For example, the position paper referred to cooperation with the European Commission in the context of the Google shopping case and the cooperation within the European Competition Network regarding hotel booking sites [see our May 2017 Newsletter]. On a national level, the ACM plans to cooperate with the Dutch Data Protection Authority and the Dutch Media Authority (DMA). In December 2017, for instance, the ACM reported that it had launched a joint study with the DMA into the effects of digitalization on the media landscape.

This position paper reaffirms that digital markets are becoming a core focus of the ACM. So far, however, the ACM has not found any indication of anticompetitive conduct or dominant market power. See, for example, our September 2017 Newsletter on the study by the ACM into the market for online video streaming platforms. It remains to be seen whether there will be an increase in enforcement action in the future.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of March 2018. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Court of Justice dismisses all appeals against cartel decision in the freight forwarding sector

  2. ACM publishes key priorities for 2018 and 2019

Team

Related news

06.02.2020 NL law
The ACM may cast the net wide in cartel investigations

Short Reads - Companies beware: the ACM may not need to specify the scope of its investigation into suspected cartel infringements in as much detail as expected. On 14 January 2020, the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal upheld the ACM’s appeal against judgments of the Rotterdam District Court, which had quashed cartel fines imposed on cold storage operators. The operators had argued that the ACM was time-barred from pursuing a case against them, because the ACM had not suspended the prescription period by beginning investigative actions specifically related to the alleged infringements.

Read more

07.02.2020 BE law
Het finale Belgische ‘nationaal energie- en klimaatplan’ en de Belgische langetermijnstrategie: het geduld van de Commissie op de proef gesteld?

Articles - Op 31 december 2019 diende België, nog net op tijd, zijn definitieve nationaal energie- en klimaatplan (NEKP) in bij de Commissie. Het staat nu al vast dat het Belgische NEKP niet op applaus zal worden onthaald door de Commissie. Verder laat ook de Belgische langetermijnstrategie op zich wachten. Wat zijn de gevolgen?

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
CDC/Kemira: Amsterdam Court of Appeal applies European principle of effectiveness to limitation periods

Short Reads - In a private enforcement case brought by CDC against Kemira, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal applies the European principle of effectiveness and rules that claims are not time-barred under Spanish, Finnish and Swedish law. With reference to the Cogeco judgment of the ECJ, the Court considers that claimants must be able to await the outcome of any administrative appeal against an infringement decision, even in relation to respondents who themselves have not filed appeals against the infringement decision.

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
Pay-for-delay: brightened lines between object and effect restrictions

Short Reads - In its first pay-for-delay case, the ECJ has clarified the criteria determining whether settlement agreements between a patent holder of a pharmaceutical product and a generic manufacturer may have as their object or effect to restrict EU competition law. The judgment confirms the General Court’s earlier rulings in Lundbeck and Servier (see our October 2016 and December 2018 newsletters) in which it was held that pay-for-delay agreements (in these cases) constituted a restriction ‘by object’.

Read more

06.02.2020 NL law
Consumers and Sustainability: 2020 competition enforcement buzzwords

Short Reads - The ACM will include the effects of mergers on labour conditions in its review. It will also investigate excessive pricing of prescription drugs. As well as these topics, the ACM has designated the digital economy and energy transition as its 2020 focus areas. Companies can therefore expect increased enforcement to protect online consumers, and active probing of algorithms.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring