umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Short Reads

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

01.03.2018 EU law

On 1 February 2018, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) published a position paper setting out its strategy in relation to market dominance of internet and technology companies. The position paper confirms that the ACM will focus on digital markets and closely monitor developments in this area.

The ACM highlights the following three pillars of its strategy with regard to digital markets:

  1. Invest in knowledge on the functioning of digital markets. The ACM intends to invest in obtaining knowledge on the functioning of digital markets.

  2. Active monitoring of the market. The ACM will continue to closely monitor developments in the market so that it can act in a timely and accurate manner. At the same time, the ACM recognizes that technological innovation in digital markets is important for competitive dynamics, which it does not want to disrupt.

  3. Focus on international and national cooperation. Finally, the ACM will actively cooperate with international and national authorities in this sector. For example, the position paper referred to cooperation with the European Commission in the context of the Google shopping case and the cooperation within the European Competition Network regarding hotel booking sites [see our May 2017 Newsletter]. On a national level, the ACM plans to cooperate with the Dutch Data Protection Authority and the Dutch Media Authority (DMA). In December 2017, for instance, the ACM reported that it had launched a joint study with the DMA into the effects of digitalization on the media landscape.

This position paper reaffirms that digital markets are becoming a core focus of the ACM. So far, however, the ACM has not found any indication of anticompetitive conduct or dominant market power. See, for example, our September 2017 Newsletter on the study by the ACM into the market for online video streaming platforms. It remains to be seen whether there will be an increase in enforcement action in the future.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of March 2018. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Court of Justice dismisses all appeals against cartel decision in the freight forwarding sector

  2. ACM publishes key priorities for 2018 and 2019

Team

Related news

04.03.2021 NL law
Net(work) closing in on cross-border cartels?

Short Reads - A heads-up for companies with cross-border activities. The ECN+ Directive’s transposition deadline has expired and its provisions should by now have found their way into the national laws of the EU Member States. In the Netherlands, amendments to the Dutch Competition Act giving effect to the ECN+ Directive came into force recently, together with a new governmental decree on leniency.

Read more

04.03.2021 NL law
Amsterdam Court of Appeal accepts jurisdiction in competition law damages case concerning Greek beer market

Short Reads - On 16 February 2021, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal (the Court of Appeal) set aside a judgment of the Amsterdam District Court (the District Court) in which the District Court declined jurisdiction over the alleged claims against Athenian Brewery (AB), a Greek subsidiary of Heineken N.V. (Heineken), in a civil case brought by competitor Macedonian Thrace Brewery (MTB).

Read more

04.02.2021 NL law
ECJ clarifies limits of antitrust limitation periods

Short Reads - Companies confronted with antitrust investigations and fines may find safeguard behind the rules governing limitation periods (often termed ‘statutes of limitation’). However, two preliminary rulings by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) show that those rules are not necessarily set in stone. According to the ECJ, national time limits relating to the imposition of antitrust fines may require deactivation if these limits result in a ‘systemic risk’ that antitrust infringements may go unpunished.

Read more

12.02.2021 EU law
After the Uber case and the Airbnb case … the Star Taxi App case: focus on the question of the qualification as “Information Society Service”

Articles - Societal and digital developments are reflected in the case law of the CJEU. For several years now, European judges resolve disputes relating to digital applications and the services they provide. On 3 December 2020, they handed down a judgment in a case concerning Star Taxi App. This blog analyses the Star Taxi App case law in the light of the Uber case law and the Airbnb case law. The three judgments have in common the question of the qualification of services as Information Society Services.  

Read more

04.02.2021 NL law
Game over? Gaming companies fined for geo-blocking

Short Reads - The Commission’s cross-border sales crusade seems far from over. The EUR 7.8 million fine imposed on distribution platform owner Valve and five PC video games publishers for geo-blocking practices is the most recent notch in the Commission’s belt. Food producer Mondelĕz may be next on the Commission’s hit list: a formal investigation into possible cross-border trade restrictions was opened recently.

Read more