Short Reads

Dutch Competition Authority publishes market study into online video streaming platforms

Dutch Competition Authority publishes market study into online video

Dutch Competition Authority publishes market study into online video streaming platforms

01.09.2017

On 22 August 2017, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) published a study into the market for online video streaming platforms. Although the study did not find any indications of anticompetitive conduct or dominant market power, the authority warned that it will keep a close eye on developments in this sector.

On 22 August 2017, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) published a study into the market for online video streaming platforms. Although the study did not find any indications of anticompetitive conduct or dominant market power, the authority warned that it will keep a close eye on developments in this sector.

The study notes that online video platforms such as Youtube and Netflix have become increasingly popular over the last decade. Some of these platforms (e.g. Youtube) generate revenue by selling online advertising space to advertisers, while others use a subscription based model (e.g. Netflix). Although the ACM did not undertake a fully-fledged market definition analysis, its findings indicated that consumer data plays a key role in the offering, buying and reselling of online advertising space. As for potential competition risks, the study looked into three different scenarios:

  1. First, the ACM investigated whether the collection of consumer data by platforms resulted in market power. The ACM found that there is no automatic relationship between data collection and market power because, for example, new entrants are sufficiently able to start collecting data after they have entered the video streaming market.
  2. Second, the study explored whether competition concerns arise if a platform with a relatively high market share (e.g. Youtube) only trades its advertising space via its own trading technology. The ACM concluded that this is unlikely, as there appears to be no platform with a dominant position in online video advertising at present.
  3. Third, the study inquired whether online platforms such as Facebook act as 'bottlenecks', forcing content creators to be active on these platforms if they want to reach consumers. At this moment in time, the ACM found that there are plenty of other ways to reach the public other than through large platforms.

     

Accordingly, the ACM found no competition problems in any of the three scenarios. However, a preliminary investigation into the general terms and conditions of the platforms found that some conditions are unfair from a consumer law perspective.

The study by the ACM follows the publication of the e-commerce sector inquiry by the European Commission in May 2017 [see our June 2017 Newsletter]. It is now clear that the digital economy is also on the ACM's radar, although it remains to be seen whether national enforcement action will follow.

Team

Related news

02.07.2019 NL law
Debate night: HR Analytics: opportunity or threat?

Seminar - On 2 July 2019, Stibbe's Digital Economy Group will host a debate night in Amsterdam on the hot topic of HR analytics. During Stibbe's debate night, speakers from the world of business, politics, science and law will exchange views on HR analytics, how they can be used in practice, and their development in the context of employment and privacy law.

Read more

18.06.2019 NL law
Initial guidance from the Dutch State Secretary of Finance on the "Danish Cases" relating to beneficial ownership

Short Reads - On 26 February 2019 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in various cases regarding the interpretation and non-application of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive ("PSD") and Interest and Royalties Directive ("IRD") in the context of tax avoidance and beneficial ownership (the so-called "Danish Cases").

Read more

25.06.2019 LU law
The dawn of a new era of cross-border mobility within the EU?

Seminar - François Bernard, Senior Associate at Stibbe Luxembourg, will conduct a seminar in Luxembourg on 25 June in collaboration with Legitech on Directive proposal COM2018 (241 final) amending the cross-border merger regime currently enshrined in Directive (EU) 2017/1132 and introducing a new regime applicable to cross-border conversions and divisions.

Read more

18.06.2019 NL law
Countdown. Een cursus aftellen voor juristen

Articles - Hoe lang duurt een verzetstermijn nu precies? Voor juridische fusie schrijft art. 2:316 lid 2 BW voor dat tot een maand nadat alle te fuseren rechtspersonen de fusie hebben aangekondigd iedere schuldeiser bij de rechtbank tegen het voorstel tot fusie in verzet kan komen. Art. 2:317 lid 2 BW bepaalt vervolgens dat een besluit tot fusie een maand na de dag waarop alle fuserende rechtspersonen de fusie hebben aangekondigd kan worden genomen. De vraag is wanneer nu precies die verzetstermijn eindigt.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring