Articles

New AML Act published today introduces obligation to declare Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) to central register

New AML act published today introduces obligation to declare ultimate

New AML Act published today introduces obligation to declare Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) to central register

06.10.2017 BE law

Today, the new Anti-Money Laundering Act (the “AML Act”), was published in the Belgian Official Gazette. This act incorporates the Fourth EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive 2015/849 (“Fourth AML Directive”) into Belgian law. It will enter into force as from 16 October 2017.

One of the most significant features of the new AML Act is the establishment of a central register at the Ministry of Finance (the “UBO Register”) to which all companies established in Belgium, (and certain other legal entities) will have to provide information regarding their Ultimate Beneficial Owner(s) (“UBO”). 

This newsletter will deal with the implications of this new obligation with regard to companies.

Why the need for an UBO Register?

AML legislation traditionally requires organizations like financial and credit institutions (“Obliged Entities”) to investigate and verify their clients’ identity, including their UBOs.  

For sake of greater transparency and to better facilitate this obligation the Fourth AML Directive requires all Member States to set up a central register where accurate and up to date information regarding the UBOs can be consulted.

Who qualifies as an UBO?

The AML Act defines an UBO as (1) any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the legal entity and/or (2) the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted.

(1) Person(s) who own or control the legal entity

  • The natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls a legal entity through direct or indirect ownership of a sufficient percentage of the shares or voting rights or ownership interest in that entity, including through bearer shareholdings.
    Ownership of more than 25% of the shares or voting rights will be regarded as an indication of a sufficient percentage.  
  • Exercise control over the legal entity through other means.

If it is not possible to identify the aforesaid ultimate beneficial owners, after exhausting all means, the natural person(s) who are senior managing officials within the company (directors, managers or officers) shall qualify as the company’s UBOs.

(2) Person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted

Any person who benefits or could/will benefit from a transaction or business relationship and who by fact or by law has the power to decide on the execution of the transaction or the establishment of a business relationship.

Which entities have to provide information to the UBO Register?

The obligation to provide information to the register will apply to all companies established in Belgium, foundations, (international) non-profit associations as well as trusts and fiduciaries (and similar arrangements).

Although Obliged Entities do not have to verify the UBOs of listed companies, any company established in Belgium (including listed companies) will still have to provide the required information to the UBO Register. 

Although not defined in the AML Act itself, the term “companies” logically refers to all companies organized in accordance with the Belgian Companies Code including limited companies (e.g. NV/SA, BVBA/SPRL), partnerships, cooperatives (CVBA/SCRL) and other corporate entities in the broad sense of the word.

Trusts, fiduciaries (and similar legal arrangements) will also be subject to the UBO obligations, but the implementation has been postponed, in view of the upcoming Fifth AML Directive (expected October 2017).

What information will have to be provided to the UBO Register?

At least the following information will have to be provided to the Register:

  • the UBO’s name, date of birth, nationality and address;
  • the nature and extent of the beneficial interest held.

A future decree (see below) will set out the required information in greater detail.

How will the information be collected and processed by the register?

The practicalities regarding the register have yet to be determined by decree.

With regard to companies, however, it is already known that the UBO information will have to be provided by the directors to the register, electronically, within one month time from the date when the data become known or are modified.

Who will have access to the register?

The future decree will also have to determine who has access to the register, and under what terms.

According to the Directive, however, access must at least be granted to

  • competent authorities;
  • financial and credit institutions (and other Obliged Entities) in the framework of their AML obligations;
  • any person or organization that can demonstrate a legitimate interest.

The Fourth AML Directive offers member states the option to charge a fee for access to the register.

What are the sanctions in case of non-compliance?

First, if a company fails to timely comply with its UBO identification obligations, its directors can not only be held liable by the company but also be punished with fines ranging from minimum EUR 50 to maximum EUR 5,000 under the Companies Code.  

Second, the AML Act provides for an administrative fine, issued by the Minister of Finance, ranging between EUR 250 and EUR 50,000 for failure to comply with the UBO identification obligations.   

From which date on will the information need to be provided to the UBO register?

All depends on the date of publication of the decree that will determine the practicalities of the UBO register.  The decree is expected to be published in February 2018. The register should also be up and running by June 2018.

 

Useful links

Team

Related news

12.07.2018 NL law
Voortgang wetsvoorstel Wet bescherming bedrijfsgeheimen

Short Reads - Op 5 juli 2016 is de Richtlijn bedrijfsgeheimen (2016/943/EU) in werking getreden. De richtlijn heeft tot doel de regels inzake bescherming van niet-openbaar gemaakte knowhow en bedrijfsinformatie (bedrijfsgeheimen) in de EU lidstaten te harmoniseren. De richtlijn moest voor 9 juni 2018 geïmplementeerd zijn in de Nederlandse wet- en regelgeving. Nederland heeft deze termijn niet gehaald.

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Wet aanvullende maatregelen accountantsorganisaties in werking getreden

Short Reads - Op 1 juli 2018 zijn de Wet aanvullende maatregelen accountantsorganisaties en het bijbehorende Besluit tot onder meer aanpassing van het Besluit toezicht accountantsorganisaties (Bta) (grotendeels) in werking getreden. De wet beoogt de kwaliteit van de accountantscontroles te verbeteren. Met het oog daarop zijn met name voorschriften ingevoerd die zien op de governance van accountantsorganisaties en zijn de bevoegdheden van de AFM uitgebreid.

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Initiatief wetsvoorstel Wet bestuurlijk verbod rechtspersonen geconsulteerd

Articles - Begin dit jaar is het initiatief van enkele Kamerleden voor het voorstel van de Wet bestuurlijk verbod rechtspersonen geconsulteerd. Het voorstel geeft de Minister voor Rechtsbescherming de bevoegdheid om een rechtspersoon bij beschikking te verbieden en te ontbinden indien zijn werkzaamheid in strijd is met de openbare orde. De wet is een aanvulling op de mogelijkheid voor de rechter om – op verzoek van het Openbaar Ministerie – rechtspersonen waarvan de werkzaamheid in strijd is met de openbare orde verboden te verklaren en te ontbinden (art. 2:20 BW).

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming van toepassing

Short Reads - Vanaf 25 mei 2018 zijn de Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (Verordening (EU) 2016/679) (AVG) en de Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (Uitvoeringswet) van toepassing in Nederland. De AVG en de Uitvoeringswet vervangen de richtlijn betreffende de bescherming van natuurlijke personen in verband met de verwerking van persoonsgegevens (Richtlijn 95/46/EG) en de Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens (Wbp).

Read more

12.07.2018 NL law
Evaluatie van de Wet aanpassing enquêterecht

Articles - Op 1 januari 2013 is de Wet aanpassing enquêterecht in werking getreden. Deze wet is geëvalueerd door de Tilburg University. De uitkomsten van deze evaluatie zijn op 21 maart 2018 door de Minister voor Rechtsbescherming gepubliceerd. In deze Corporate Update een overzicht van enkele conclusies en aanbevelingen van de onderzoekscommissie. Wij verwijzen in dit verband tevens naar de samenvatting van het onderzoek.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring