Short Reads

Rejection of the level 2 draft RTS implementing PRIIPs by the European Parliament

Rejection of the level 2 draft RTS implementing PRIIPs by the Europea

Rejection of the level 2 draft RTS implementing PRIIPs by the European Parliament

16.09.2016 BE law

The PRIIPs Regulation introduces the so-called Key Information Document (the so-called “KID”) which will have to be provided to retail consumers when they buy retail and insurance-based investment products. These include asset management products and other "packaged" investment products sold by banks or insurance companies.

The PRIIPs Regulation1 introduces the so-called Key Information Document (the so-called “KID”) which will have to be provided to retail consumers when they buy retail and insurance-based investment products. These include asset management products and other "packaged" investment products sold by banks or insurance companies.

On 14 September 2016, the European Parliament has objected to a draft delegated regulation2 (Draft RTS and Draft RTS annexes) of the European Commission containing regulatory technical standards (RTS) with regard to (i) the presentation, content, review and revision of KIDs and (ii) the technical conditions that have to be met to fulfil the obligation to provide such documents.

In its press release, the Parliament stated that the draft legislation designed to protect retail investors was rejected by MEPs on as so “flawed and misleading” that it could actually lose them money’. Therefore, it will unusually be returned to the Commission for revision.

As the PRIIPs Regulation is due to come into force on 31 December 2016, the European Parliament has requested the European Commission to consider a proposal postponing the date of entry into force of the PRIIPs Regulation.

On the Belgian side, the national legislator has anticipated the PRIIPs Regulation with the adoption on 25 April 2014 of the Royal Decree concerning certain information requirements for the distribution of financial products to non-professional clients (the so-called “Transversal Royal Decree”).

The entry into force of the provisions transposing the PRIIPs Regulation has, however, been postponed by the Royal Decree of 2 June 2015 to a currently undetermined date.

The “postponed” provisions are the provisions with respect to the mandatory and voluntary information sheet (which implements the PRIIPs KID requirements); the requirement to include a risk label in any advertisement, announcement or other document and Articles 22, e and 23 with respect to future performance of financial products which are linked to the performance of financial assets, indices or reference portfolios and, if applicable, the obligation to retake unchanged the numerical examples from the KID in the marketing documents. In the Annex of the Transversal Royal Decree the legislator has even given ready-to-use templates per type of investment product.

It is not sure what the Belgian legislator will do next and when. There is currently no public information available on this.

  1. Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products.

  2. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) …/... of 30.6.2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) by laying down regulatory technical standards with regard to the presentation, content, review and revision of key information documents and the conditions for fulfilling the requirement to provide such documents

This article was co-written by Sarah De Dijn in her capacity as an associate at Stibbe.

Related news

20.05.2020 NL law
Perpetual securities not considered equity for Dutch corporate income tax purposes

Short Reads - In a decision of Friday 15 May 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court confirmed that fixed-to-floating rate perpetual equity securities (“perpetual securities”) should not be considered a “participation loan” (deelnemerschapslening) for Dutch tax purposes. Under Dutch tax law, characterization of a debt instrument as a “participation loan” implies that such instrument is deemed equity for Dutch corporate income tax purposes. Characterization of the perpetual securities as a participation loan would have meant that the interest would have been regarded non-deductible dividend.

Read more

12.05.2020 NL law
Kroniek van het mededingingsrecht

Articles - Wat de gevolgen van de coronacrisis zullen zijn voor de samenleving, de economie en – laat staan – het mededingingsbeleid laat zich op het moment van de totstandkoming van deze kroniek niet voorspellen. Wel stond al vast dat het mededingingsrecht zal worden herijkt op basis van de fundamentele uitdagingen die voortvloeien uit zich ontwikkelende ideeën over het belang van industriepolitiek, klimaatverandering en de positie van tech-ondernemingen en de platforms die zij exploiteren.

Read more

07.05.2020 NL law
COVID-19: fast-forwarding competition law

Short Reads - Competition authorities are temporarily ‘green-lighting’ certain collaboration initiatives to safeguard the supply of essential products in light of the COVID-19 outbreak. At the same time, authorities warn against using the current exceptional circumstances to engage in anti-competitive practices, such as price-fixing, excessive pricing, refusals to deal or opportunistic takeovers. 

Read more

07.05.2020 NL law
ECJ confirms: no shortcut for ‘by object’ antitrust infringements

Short Reads - The European Court of Justice has found there is no shortcut for determining whether particular conduct can be held to have the object to restrict competition. A competition authority will always need to assess carefully whether the conduct reveals "a sufficient degree of harm to competition” before labelling it a ‘by object’ infringement. This is the case where there is sufficiently solid and reliable experience showing that this type of conduct is commonly regarded as being inherently anticompetitive.

Read more

07.05.2020 NL law
Spreading fast: Dutch and Belgian COVID-19 State-aid approved

Short Reads - Many Member States are taking measures to support the economy during the COVID-19 crisis. The European Commission’s Temporary Framework enables the rapid approval of certain types of State aid. So far, three Dutch State aid schemes and six Belgian schemes were approved, providing the beneficiaries with legal certainty that the aid received is in line with EU State aid law and cannot be challenged at a later stage.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring