Short Reads

Rejection of the level 2 draft RTS implementing PRIIPs by the European Parliament

Rejection of the level 2 draft RTS implementing PRIIPs by the Europea

Rejection of the level 2 draft RTS implementing PRIIPs by the European Parliament

16.09.2016 BE law

The PRIIPs Regulation introduces the so-called Key Information Document (the so-called “KID”) which will have to be provided to retail consumers when they buy retail and insurance-based investment products. These include asset management products and other "packaged" investment products sold by banks or insurance companies.

The PRIIPs Regulation1 introduces the so-called Key Information Document (the so-called “KID”) which will have to be provided to retail consumers when they buy retail and insurance-based investment products. These include asset management products and other "packaged" investment products sold by banks or insurance companies.

On 14 September 2016, the European Parliament has objected to a draft delegated regulation2 (Draft RTS and Draft RTS annexes) of the European Commission containing regulatory technical standards (RTS) with regard to (i) the presentation, content, review and revision of KIDs and (ii) the technical conditions that have to be met to fulfil the obligation to provide such documents.

In its press release, the Parliament stated that the draft legislation designed to protect retail investors was rejected by MEPs on as so “flawed and misleading” that it could actually lose them money’. Therefore, it will unusually be returned to the Commission for revision.

As the PRIIPs Regulation is due to come into force on 31 December 2016, the European Parliament has requested the European Commission to consider a proposal postponing the date of entry into force of the PRIIPs Regulation.

On the Belgian side, the national legislator has anticipated the PRIIPs Regulation with the adoption on 25 April 2014 of the Royal Decree concerning certain information requirements for the distribution of financial products to non-professional clients (the so-called “Transversal Royal Decree”).

The entry into force of the provisions transposing the PRIIPs Regulation has, however, been postponed by the Royal Decree of 2 June 2015 to a currently undetermined date.

The “postponed” provisions are the provisions with respect to the mandatory and voluntary information sheet (which implements the PRIIPs KID requirements); the requirement to include a risk label in any advertisement, announcement or other document and Articles 22, e and 23 with respect to future performance of financial products which are linked to the performance of financial assets, indices or reference portfolios and, if applicable, the obligation to retake unchanged the numerical examples from the KID in the marketing documents. In the Annex of the Transversal Royal Decree the legislator has even given ready-to-use templates per type of investment product.

It is not sure what the Belgian legislator will do next and when. There is currently no public information available on this.

  1. Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products.

  2. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) …/... of 30.6.2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on key information documents for packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) by laying down regulatory technical standards with regard to the presentation, content, review and revision of key information documents and the conditions for fulfilling the requirement to provide such documents

This article was co-written by Sarah De Dijn in her capacity as an associate at Stibbe.

Related news

08.10.2019 NL law
De Afdeling herhaalt haar jurisprudentie: bij een 'verdachte' rechtspersoon komt het zwijgrecht in beginsel alleen toe aan de bestuurders van die rechtspersoon

Short Reads - De uitspraak van 21 augustus 2019 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:2801) betreft werknemers van een asbestverwijderingsbedrijf die bezig zijn met werkzaamheden in een pand. Na een melding van het asbestverwijderingsbedrijf zelf, vindt een inspectie plaats. Na een gesprek met de werknemers constateert de inspecteur dat sloopwerkzaamheden worden verricht, terwijl er in het pand asbesthoudende materialen zijn die nog niet zijn verwijderd.

Read more

03.10.2019 NL law
It's in the details: HSBC fine quashed for insufficient reasoning

Short Reads - The General Court annulled the EUR 33.6 million fine imposed on banking group HSBC for its participation in the euro interest rates derivatives cartel. Full annulment was granted based on the Commission's failure to provide sufficiently detailed reasoning for the first step of the fine calculation, establishing the value of sales. As the value of sales could not be established in a straightforward way, the Commission used a proxy. When doing so, the Commission needs to properly explain its reasoning to allow the companies fined to understand how it arrived at the proxy. 

Read more

08.10.2019 NL law
De Afdeling herhaalt haar jurisprudentie: bij een 'verdachte' rechtspersoon komt het zwijgrecht in beginsel alleen toe aan de bestuurders van die rechtspersoon

Articles - De uitspraak van 21 augustus 2019 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:2801) betreft werknemers van een asbestverwijderingsbedrijf die bezig zijn met werkzaamheden in een pand. Na een melding van het asbestverwijderingsbedrijf zelf, vindt een inspectie plaats. Na een gesprek met de werknemers constateert de inspecteur dat sloopwerkzaamheden worden verricht, terwijl er in het pand asbesthoudende materialen zijn die nog niet zijn verwijderd. Het bedrijf krijgt om die reden een boete op grond van artikel 4.48a lid 1 Arbobesluit.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring