Articles

Dutch Data Protection Authority increases maximum fine for data breaches committed by telecom providers

Dutch Data Protection Authority increases maximum fine for data breaches committed by telecom providers

Dutch Data Protection Authority increases maximum fine for data breaches committed by telecom providers

13.10.2016

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (“DPA”) has amended its Penalty Policy Rules under an amendment of the Dutch Telecommunication Act. The new rules apply as from 1 July 2016.

Previously, the DPA could impose an administrative fine up to a maximum of EUR 450,000 if a telecom provider did not (immediately) notify the DPA of a data breach in accordance with Article 11.3(a) of the Dutch Telecommunication Act. This fine’s maximum has now been increased to EUR 900,000 in both the DPA’s Penalty Policy Rules and the Dutch Telecommunication Act.

The starting point of the DPA in determining the amount of the fine is that fines must be proportional to the violation committed. Fines that can be imposed by the DPA can vary from a maximum of EUR 20,250 for relatively minor violations to a maximum of EUR 900,000 (previously: EUR 820,000) for deliberate or repeated violations of the Dutch Data Protection Act. For legal entities that have violated this Act, the fine is flexible: if the amount of fine set for the highest penalty category is not sufficiently punitive, the violation can be sanctioned additionally with a fine equivalent to up to 10% of the company’s annual net turnover.

Fines may only be imposed on a company following a binding instruction given from the DPA. Through this instruction, the DPA can inform the company what steps it should take to avoid paying the fine. But if the violation concerned was either intentional or a matter of serious culpable negligence, the DPA is not obliged to issue an instruction and can impose a fine directly.

We will of course inform you if the DPA imposes significant fines with respect to violations of the Dutch Data Protection Act.

 

This document can be found here (only available in Dutch). 

Team

Related news

24.09.2021 EU law
Digital Law Up(to)date: (1) the download of a software with a permanent licence can constitute a “sale of goods”; (2) alert of the BEUC regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp and its new term of use

Articles - In this blog, we briefly present two interesting news in the field of digital law: (1) a judgment of the CJEU considering that the download of a software with a permanent licence can constitute a “sale of goods”, and (2) an alert of the BEUC regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp and its new terms of use.

Read more

09.09.2021 BE law
Digital Law Up(to)date: (1) Parliamentary initiatives about cyber attacks; (2) ‘Zero tariff’ options before the CJEU; and (3) Council of State, GDPR and encryption

Articles - In this blog, we briefly present three interesting news in the field of digital law: (1) Parliamentary initiatives to tackle cyber attacks (2) "Zero tariff" options and open internet access do not mix! (3) Council of State, GDPR and encryption: validation of a decision of the Flemish Authorities

Read more

26.08.2021 BE law
Sarah De Wulf and Malik Baba co-authored a book dedicated to the legal aspects of the video-game industry

Articles - The book, entitled 'Legal Aspects of the video-game industry', provides a first answer to the most important legal questions that might arise in the lifecycle of a video-game company. These insights are intended to be applicable irrespective of jurisdictions, illustrated by real-life situations and easy to read for individuals without a legal background.

Read more

13.09.2021 NL law
Adopting the new Standard Contractual Clauses to secure international personal data transfers

Short Reads - Recently, the European Commission issued an implementing decision on standard new contractual clauses (“SCCs”) for the transfer of personal data to countries outside the European Economic Area. Organisations need to use the new SCCs from 27 September 2021 and onwards. Transitional periods apply for existing international data transfer agreements. To meet their obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation, organisations need to make the appropriate changes in time.

Read more

26.08.2021 EU law
Facebook/Belgian DPA: Landmark ruling on cross-border enforcement under the GDPR

Short Reads - On 15 June 2021, the CJEU delivered an important judgment on the one-stop-shop mechanism. While the CJEU reinforced that the lead supervisory authority is the sole interlocutor in cross-border processing operations, it also contributed to the effective enforcement of the GDPR by reiterating the conditions under which supervisory authorities other than the lead supervisory authority can bring enforcement actions against such processing operations.

Read more