Articles

Dutch Data Protection Authority increases maximum fine for data breaches committed by telecom providers

Dutch Data Protection Authority increases maximum fine for data breaches committed by telecom providers

Dutch Data Protection Authority increases maximum fine for data breaches committed by telecom providers

13.10.2016

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (“DPA”) has amended its Penalty Policy Rules under an amendment of the Dutch Telecommunication Act. The new rules apply as from 1 July 2016.

Previously, the DPA could impose an administrative fine up to a maximum of EUR 450,000 if a telecom provider did not (immediately) notify the DPA of a data breach in accordance with Article 11.3(a) of the Dutch Telecommunication Act. This fine’s maximum has now been increased to EUR 900,000 in both the DPA’s Penalty Policy Rules and the Dutch Telecommunication Act.

The starting point of the DPA in determining the amount of the fine is that fines must be proportional to the violation committed. Fines that can be imposed by the DPA can vary from a maximum of EUR 20,250 for relatively minor violations to a maximum of EUR 900,000 (previously: EUR 820,000) for deliberate or repeated violations of the Dutch Data Protection Act. For legal entities that have violated this Act, the fine is flexible: if the amount of fine set for the highest penalty category is not sufficiently punitive, the violation can be sanctioned additionally with a fine equivalent to up to 10% of the company’s annual net turnover.

Fines may only be imposed on a company following a binding instruction given from the DPA. Through this instruction, the DPA can inform the company what steps it should take to avoid paying the fine. But if the violation concerned was either intentional or a matter of serious culpable negligence, the DPA is not obliged to issue an instruction and can impose a fine directly.

We will of course inform you if the DPA imposes significant fines with respect to violations of the Dutch Data Protection Act.

 

This document can be found here (only available in Dutch). 

Team

Related news

04.05.2021 NL law
Participatie en privacyregels: hoe te combineren onder de Omgevingswet?

Short Reads - In het stelsel van de Omgevingswet (Ow) is een belangrijke rol bedacht voor participatie bij de totstandkoming van besluiten. Het beoogde resultaat: tijdig belangen, meningen en creativiteit op tafel krijgen en daarmee een groter draagvlak en kwalitatief betere besluitvorming bereiken. Door een grotere betrokkenheid van meer personen gaan overheden en initiatiefnemers ook meer persoonsgegevens verwerken. Dit brengt privacyrisico’s met zich mee. Wat regelt de Ow op het gebied van privacy, de verwerking van persoonsgegevens en datagebruik?

Read more

04.03.2021 BE law
Webinar: Responding to Personal Data Breaches in the Post-GDPR era

Seminar - On 24-26 March 2021 ERA (Adademy of European Law) organises an online Conference "Responding to Personal Data Breaches in the Post-GDPR era". Erik Valgaeren, our Brussels TMT partner, addresses the topic "Managing personal data breach in a complex international scenario", including cross border cases in the EU and breaches at non-EU establishments.

Read more

12.02.2021 EU law
After the Uber case and the Airbnb case … the Star Taxi App case: focus on the question of the qualification as “Information Society Service”

Articles - Societal and digital developments are reflected in the case law of the CJEU. For several years now, European judges resolve disputes relating to digital applications and the services they provide. On 3 December 2020, they handed down a judgment in a case concerning Star Taxi App. This blog analyses the Star Taxi App case law in the light of the Uber case law and the Airbnb case law. The three judgments have in common the question of the qualification of services as Information Society Services.  

Read more