Articles

Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ordered ACM to disclose oral leniency statements

Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ordered ACM to disclose oral leniency statements

Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ordered ACM to disclose oral leniency statements

05.01.2016 NL law

On 2 December 2015, the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal ("CBb") ordered the Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM") to grant access to oral leniency submissions to the defendants in the Dutch flour cartel appeal. The CBb weighed the interest of protecting the leniency programme against the interests of the defendants and decided in favour of the latter.

In the context of the ACM's leniency programme in cartel cases, leniency applicants may choose to provide their leniency statements orally. During the administrative procedure, defendants are subsequently provided access to transcripts of the oral statements at the ACM's premises. They are, however, not allowed to make copies and have to agree that they will only use the information for their defence in the cartel proceedings. This procedure is designed to safeguard confidentiality of the leniency statements, which may be an important precondition for leniency applicants to participate in the programme.

In the proceedings before the CBb, the ACM provided the transcripts of the oral statements to the CBb with the request to withhold them from the other parties to the proceedings, considering the importance of confidentiality.

The CBb rejected the ACM's request, considering that the protection of the ACM's leniency programme was in this case not as important as safeguarding the rights of defence. In this respect, the CBb considered it relevant that the parties already had knowledge of the content of the oral statements so that the interest in withholding the transcripts from them was limited.

The decision may lead the ACM to reconsider its current practice regarding oral statements in its leniency programme.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of January 2016. Other articles in this newsletter:

Team

Related news

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Please share – ACM conditionally clears shared mobility platform merger

Short Reads - There may soon be a new competition tool available to tackle structural competition concerns in dynamic tech and platform markets. Until then, competition authorities resort to existing tools to deal with these markets. The Dutch competition authority (ACM) recently subjected the merger of two emerging platforms – without significant market footprint – to behavioural remedies. On 20 May 2020, the ACM cleared the merger between the travel apps of Dutch rail operator NS and transport company Pon.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
No proof of competitive disadvantage? No abusive favouritism

Short Reads - Companies claiming abuse of dominance in civil proceedings have their work cut out for them, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Real estate association VBO had accused dominant online platform Funda of favouritism. However, in line with the District Court’s earlier ruling, the Appeal Court dismissed the claim for insufficient evidence of negative effects on competition. The ruling confirms that the effect-based approach also applies in civil abuse claims, and that the standard of proof is high.    

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

Short Reads - Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Not so fast – General Court clarifies merger control test

Short Reads - There is no magical number when it comes to “4-to-3” telecom mergers. On 28 May 2020, the EU’s General Court (“Court”) handed down a landmark judgment annulling a 2016 decision of the European Commission (“Commission”) blocking the merger between O2 UK and Three. The judgment fine-tunes the Commission’s application of the “significant impediment to effective competition” test for horizontal mergers and raises the bar for proving the removal of an “important competitive force” as a result of the merger.  

Read more