Speaking slot

Christof Swaak speaks at IBC’s Legal 8th Annual "Cartels: Risk & Compliance Conference 2015" in Brussels

Christof Swaak speaks at IBC’s Legal 8th Annual "Cartels: Risk & Compliance Conference 2015" in Brussels

Christof Swaak speaks at IBC’s Legal 8th Annual "Cartels: Risk & Compliance Conference 2015" in Brussels

30.09.2015

On 30 September 2015, Christof Swaak speaks at the annual "Cartels: Risk & Compliance" conference organised by IBC. 

The new Directive on Antitrust Damages Actions, which was adopted in November 2014 and has to be implemented within two years, makes it easier for claimants to bring cases. It allows a decision from a competition authority to serve as proof of an infringement in follow-on damages actions. This is expected to drastically increase the volume of private enforcements in Europe, making it essential for all businesses to ensure that they minimise their cartel risk or face hefty fines. Christof will discuss "Current trends and practical challenges in private enforcement" in a panel.

Related news

06.05.2021 EU law
Abuse of economic dependence: lessons drawn from the first judgments

Short Reads - On 22 August 2020, the ban on abuse of economic dependence was implemented in Belgium (Article IV.2/1 of the Code of Economic Law). Now that almost a year has passed and the first judgments have been rendered, we assess what first lessons can be drawn from these judgments. The rulings show that the ban is regularly relied upon in court and has lowered the hurdle for plaintiffs to make their case.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Slovak Telekom: ECJ on essentials of the ‘essential facilities’ doctrine

Short Reads - Only dominant companies with a “genuinely tight grip” on the market can be forced to grant rivals access to their infrastructure. According to the ECJ’s rulings in Slovak Telekom and Deutsche Telekom, it is only in this scenario that the question of indispensability of the access for rivals comes into play. In the assessment of practices other than access refusal, indispensability may be indicative of a potential abuse of a dominant position, but is not a required condition.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Pay-for-delay saga ends with nothing new; but pharma quest continues

Short Reads - On 25 March 2021, the ECJ ended the Lundbeck pay-for-delay saga by dismissing the appeals from Lundbeck and five generic manufacturers against a European Commission ‘pay-for-delay’ decision. Following its recent Paroxetine judgment, the ECJ found that Lundbeck’s process patents did not preclude generic companies being viewed as potential competitors, particularly since the patents did not represent an insurmountable barrier to entry. In addition, the patent settlement agreements constituted infringements "by object".

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
ECJ in Pometon: beware of too much info in staggered hybrid proceedings

Short Reads - In hybrid cartel proceedings (in which one party opts out of settlement), settlement decisions should not pre-judge the outcome of the Commission's investigation into non-settling parties. When the Commission publishes the settlement decision before the decision imposing a fine on the non-settling party, it must be careful in its drafting, the European Court of Justice confirmed. Furthermore, differences in the fining methodology applied to (similarly placed) settling and non-settling parties will have to be objectively justified and sufficiently reasoned.

Read more