Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Expertise
  • Publications & Insights
  • People
  • Careers

Secondary navigation

  • Value added services
  • CSR
  • About us

SearchSearch results for: “”

524 results

Third-party effect of exoneration clauses in commercial contracts

Under Dutch law, the general principle is that contracts only have legal effects for the contracting parties themselves. In principle, contracts have no legal effects for third parties.

Sustainability of exoneration clauses and commercial contracts

In Dutch legal practice, contracting parties often agree on exoneration clauses in commercial contracts.  Exoneration clauses limit or exclude the debtor’s liability.

Negotiating a contract under conditions; subject to finance

In the pre-contractual phase, Dutch professional contracting parties often negotiate a financing arrangement clause or a “subject to finance” clause.

Negotiating a contract under conditions; subject to approval

In Dutch legal practice, one of the most common conditions is the reservation of approval or the “subject to approval” clause.

Negotiating a contract under conditions; subject to signature

In the pre-contractual phase, professional contracting parties often negotiate under one or more conditions. Several different conditions are common in (commercial) legal practice: “subject to signature”, “subject to approval” and “subject to finance.”

Toni van Hees verlaat na 40 jaar de advocatuur

Per 1 september 2022 heeft Toni van Hees, partner in Stibbe’s Commercial Litigation praktijk, ons kantoor verlaten.

Netherlands Chapter in the International Comparative Legal Guide

Jeroen Kortmann, Amber van Vugt, Twan Heikens and Francis Blaauboer contributed to the International Comparative Legal Guide - Competition Litigation 2023 in a Q&A chapter about the Netherlands.

Usufruct on rent payments: Dutch Supreme Court limits freedom of contract within property law

A right of usufruct on a claim cannot be used to appropriate what is received through collection of that claim, as the Dutch Supreme Court ruled in its decision of 30 September 2022 (ECLI:NL:HR:2022:1331).

Promotie Pjotr Broere

Pjotr Broere, advocaat bij Stibbe, promoveerde op 4 oktober 2022 aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen met zijn proefschrift “De kosten van de enquêteprocedure”.

Belgian minister of finance announces stricter scope of beneficial copyright tax regime

In the context of the beneficial copyright tax regime, the Belgian government seems adamant to limit the scope and benefits of this regime. What will be the consequences, and will it survive the Belgian Constitutional Court?

Bestuursrechter of burgerlijke rechter

Wie wil procederen tegen de Staat moet weten bij welke rechter hij moet aankloppen: de burgerlijke rechter of de bestuursrechter. Dat is niet altijd eenvoudig.

Webinar Verschoningsrecht

Tim de Greve gaat samen met Prof. Petra van Kampen in op actuele ontwikkelingen in het verschoningsrecht tijdens het webinar Verschoningsrecht van de Academie voor de Rechtspraktijk.

Launch of Metaverse blog series

Stibbe launches a new blog series focusing on the legal challenges of the Metaverse. In our upcoming blog posts, we will discuss the legal challenges of NFTs, crypto-assets, Metaverse platforms, crypto exchanges, DAO, and many more.

Minke Reijneveld

Junior Associate Amsterdam

Stibbe advises Sappi

We are very pleased Stibbe is advising Sappi Limited (Sappi) in relation to the contemplated sale and carve-out transaction involving Sappi’s graphic paper mills in Maastricht.

Clémence Jonckheere

Junior Associate Brussels

Product counseling en intellectueel eigendom

In deze podcastaflevering van Stibbe Legal Insights spreken Femke van der Voort, gespecialiseerd in intellectueel eigendom, en Paul van der Hulst, mede-eigenaar en managing director van MoviĜo, over het beschermen van intellectuele eigendomsrechten.

Unauthorized representation: liability of the intermediary

This blog is one of the blogs in a series called “Commercial contracts in the Netherlands”. It is discussed as to under which circumstances third parties can hold the intermediary liable for damage suffered due to unauthorized representation.

Pagination

  • Previous page
  • Page 22
  • Current page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Next page
Reset filters
Date
Content type
  • Article (214)
  • Event (18)
  • Inside Stibbe (24)
  • Interview (1)
  • Matter (167)
  • Podcast (6)
  • People (94)
Expertise
  • (-) Intellectual Property (117)
  • (-) Litigation and Arbitration (421)
  • Audit Firms and Accountancy (76)
  • Banking and Finance (422)
  • Capital Markets (243)
  • Compliance, Sanctions and Risk (163)
  • Corporate and M&A (857)
  • Corporate Investigations (31)
  • Criminal Law and Enforcement (141)
  • Digital Economy (106)
  • Employment, Benefits and Pensions (407)
  • Energy, Industry and Climate (310)
  • Environment and Planning (872)
  • ESG & Sustainability (288)
  • EU and Competition Law (488)
  • Financial Regulation (167)
  • Healthcare and Life Sciences (85)
  • Infrastructure and Mobility (193)
  • Insurance (36)
  • Investment Funds (136)
  • Privacy and Data Protection (202)
  • Private Equity (196)
  • Procurement Law (122)
  • Public Law (1172)
  • Real Estate (466)
  • Restructuring and Insolvency (115)
  • Sports (25)
  • Stibbe StartsUP (29)
  • Tax (440)
  • Technology, Media and Telecommunications (327)
  • Unfair Competition and Consumer Protection (186)
Jurisdiction
  • BE Law (89)
  • EU Law (71)
  • LU Law (7)
  • NL Law (323)
Language
  • Dutch (89)
  • English (431)
  • French (4)

Footer main navigation

  • Expertise
  • Publications & Insights
  • People
  • Careers
© 2025 Stibbe

Footer navigation

  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • General Conditions
  • Register of legal practice areas
  • Privacy and Cookie Policy
  • Cookies Settings
  • Important Information