Articles

Digital Law Up(to)date: Art. 17 of directive 2019/790 is valid!

Digital Law Up(to)date: Art. 17 of directive 2019/790 is valid!

Digital Law Up(to)date: Art. 17 of directive 2019/790 is valid!

16.05.2022 EU law

The CJEU validates article 17 of directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (DSM directive). The new liability regime for large online platforms is therefore valid. 

According to the Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU), article 17 of directive on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (DSM directive) is valid with regard to freedom of expression (CJEU, 26 April 2022, C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament, Council of the European Union). The Court followed the opinion delivered on 15 July 2021 by the Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe, which we commented on here.

In short, article 17 organises a new liability regime for online platforms. Large online content-sharing service providers perform an “act of communication to the public” by giving public access to protected works uploaded by their users. It is a new regime because de CJEU had previously held that there was no such act on the basis of two other directives, prior to the adoption of DSM directive (see the case law Cyando and Youtube, and our comment here). Is this decision overturned? No. The commented decision states that the absence of liability (due to the absence of an act of communication to the public) remains applicable where the platforms do not fall within the scope of the new DSM Directive.

To the question whether article 17 is a restriction on freedom of expression, the CJEU answers positively. The requirements of Article 17(4) (that allow a platform not to be liable for an act of communication of a protected work for which it has no authorisation) oblige platforms to implement preventive control and filtering measures. These measures are a restriction on freedom of expression.

However, the CJEU states that the restriction is justified:

  • It is provided for by a law that is sufficiently precise and clear;
  • It respects the essential content of the right to freedom of expression; and
  • It is proportionate. 

 

By Edouard Cruysmans and Erik Valgaeren 

Team

Related news

02.06.2022 BE law
Annonces de réductions de prix denouveau réglementées

Articles - La loi du 8 mai 2022 fixant les nouvelles règles relatives aux annonces de réductions de prix (nouveaux articles VI.18 et VI.19 du Code de droit économique ("CDE")) a été publiée ce 2 juin 2022 au Moniteur belge.[1] Les annonces de réductions de prix doivent dès lors toujours mentionner le prix antérieur (ci-après "prix de référence"), c'est-à-dire le prix le plus bas appliqué par l'entreprise dans les 30 jours précédant immédiatement la réduction de prix.

Read more

02.06.2022 BE law
Aankondigingen van prijsverminderingen opnieuw gereglementeerd

Articles - In het Belgisch Staatsblad van 2 juni 2022 verscheen de wet van 8 mei 2022 met nieuwe regels voor aankondigingen van prijsverminderingen (nieuwe artikelen VI.18 en VI.19 van het Wetboek Economisch Recht (“WER”))[1]. Aankondigingen van prijsverminderingen moeten dan steeds de vorige prijs (hierna “referentieprijs”) vermelden, zijnde de laagste prijs die de onderneming in de 30 dagen onmiddellijk voorafgaand aan de prijsvermindering toepaste.

Read more