Short Reads

Foreign Subsidies Regulation crosses the finish line

Foreign Subsidies Regulation crosses the finish line

Foreign Subsidies Regulation crosses the finish line

06.07.2022 NL law

On 30 June 2022, the European Parliament and the European Council reached agreement on the final text of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation. Adding to the regulatory burdens, this Regulation creates a notification obligation for companies that receive subsidies from non-EU governments in transactions or public procurement procedures. 

As stated in an earlier newsletter article, the European Commission proposed the FSR to close a regulatory gap and create a level playing field between European and foreign-backed companies active on the internal market. Currently, subsidies granted by EU Member States are subject to close scrutiny, while subsidies by non-EU governments are not. 

The FSR sets out an obligation for companies to notify:

  • concentrations where the acquired company, one of the merging parties or the joint venture (i) is established in the EU and (ii) generates an aggregate EU turnover of at least €500 million and all parties involved in the transaction were granted non-EU combined financial contributions in the three calendar years prior to the notification of at least €50 million; and
  • tenders in public procurements where the estimated contract value is at least €250 million and the bid involves a non-EU financial contribution in the three years prior to the notification of at least €4 million per third country.

Similar to EU merger control, the FSR introduces a standstill obligation, meaning that the transaction/awarding of the contract must first be cleared by the Commission before the concentration can be completed or the bidder can be awarded the contract. If companies breach the standstill obligation, the Commission may impose a fine of up to 10% of their aggregate turnover or prohibit the transaction/awarding of the contract.

The FSR also gives the Commission the power to investigate, ex officio, and to request an ad hoc notification if it suspects that a distortive foreign subsidy may be involved.

If the Commission finds a distortive foreign subsidy, it may conduct a balancing test (taking into account both the positive and negative effects of the subsidy) and impose structural or non-structural redressive measures on companies to remedy the distortion, or accept them as commitments.

The FSR will enter into force once it is formally adopted by the Council and the Parliament and (20 days after it is) published in the Official Journal. The notification obligations under the FSR will likely apply from mid-2023. The Commission will be empowered to investigate subsidies granted up to five years before the entry into force of the FSR.

Once the FSR enters into force, companies involved in M&A transactions need to deal with all regulatory checks, including merger control, FDI and FSR.

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of July 2022. Other articles in this newsletter:

Team

Related news

03.08.2022 EU law
Gotta catch ‘em all? Upward referral of ‘killer acquisitions’ upheld

Short Reads - Companies involved in intended or completed M&A transactions falling below EU and national merger notification thresholds should beware that their deals may still catch the European Commission’s eye. The General Court has upheld the Commission’s decision to accept a national referral request regarding Illumina’s acquisition of Grail: a transaction not triggering any of the notification thresholds within the EEA.

Read more

06.07.2022 NL law
Highest Dutch court: the postman may still ring twice?

Short Reads - The Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy was wrong to unblock the ACM’s prohibited merger between postal operators PostNL and Sandd on grounds of public interest. According to the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (CBb), the Minister cannot substitute the ACM’s assessment for its own when considering public interest reasons. Since the Minister did do so in this particular case, the CBb annulled the Minister’s merger clearance.

Read more

28.07.2022 NL law
Purely commercial interest also a legitimate interest? Council of State leaves the question unanswered.

Short Reads - On 27 July 2022, the Council of State confirmed that the Dutch Data Protection Authority wrongly imposed a €575,000 fine on VoetbalTV. But the Council did not answer the question whether the AP rightly or wrongly believes that a purely commercial interest cannot be a legitimate interest within the meaning of the General Data Protection Regulation.

Read more

06.07.2022 NL law
Take note(s): Qualcomm’s EUR 1 billion dominance abuse fine quashed

Short Reads - The General Court annulled the Commission’s EUR 1 billion fine imposed on Qualcomm for abuse of dominance on the LTE chipsets market. In addition to finding fault with the Commission’s foreclosure analysis of Qualcomm’s alleged exclusivity payments, the General Court found that the Commission’s procedural irregularities alone would have sufficed to set the Commission’s decision aside.

Read more

28.07.2022 NL law
Zuiver commercieel belang ook gerechtvaardigd belang: Raad van State laat zich er niet over uit

Short Reads - Op 27 juli 2022 heeft de Raad van State bevestigd dat de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens onterecht een boete van € 575.000 aan VoetbalTV heeft opgelegd. De hoop bestond dat de Afdeling antwoord zou geven op de vraag of de AP terecht of onterecht meent dat een zuiver commercieel belang géén gerechtvaardigd belang kan zijn in de zin van de Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming. Het antwoord op deze vraag blijft echter uit.  

Read more