Short Reads

BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

BRRD II implementation in the Netherlands

15.10.2021 NL law

Recently, the Dutch bill for the implementation of BRRD II (i.e. Directive (EU) 2014/59 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms, as amended by Directive (EU) 2019/879) in the Netherlands was submitted to Dutch Parliament, where it is currently under debate.

Major topics of BRRD II include:

(i) Stay Powers: the attribution of powers to relevant authorities to suspend (a) payment and delivery obligations, (b) termination rights and (c) the enforcement of security under otherwise enforceable contractual arrangements (the ”Stay Powers”). When the Stay Powers are exercised, the relevant authorities have up to the next business day to make use of other powers that would benefit the recovery and/or resolution of the relevant bank or investment firm.

(ii) CROS clauses: the mandatory obligation to include clauses in certain financial contracts on the contractual recognition of such Stay Powers, where the relevant contracts are governed by non-EEA law (the contractual recognition of stay powers clauses, “CROS clauses”). The impact of the obligation to include CROS clauses is felt most in derivatives, repo’s, commodities contracts and securities purchase agreements of Dutch banks and investment firms which are often governed by English law or New York law. The obligation to include CROS clauses applies to new financial contracts only, and does not affect existing contracts, unless new obligations under existing contracts are entered into or existing obligations are materially amended. For example, Dutch banks and investment firms entering into derivatives under New York law or English law governed ISDA Master Agreements must include CROS clauses in their contractual documentation when new transactions are entered into.

(iii) ranking: the ranking of regulatory capital instruments of Dutch banks and investment firms in case of their recovery and resolution has been aligned throughout the EEA to ensure that capital instruments can be bailed-in in accordance with the BRRD II bail-in waterfall. The original implementation proposals were unclear as to (a) the ranking of regulatory capital instruments that are disqualified for regulatory capital purposes and (b) the consequences of contractual pari passu ranking provisions for regulatory capital instruments. These topics have been clarified in the bill before Parliament.

The Dutch Ministry of Finance consulted on the draft bill earlier this year. We are pleased that the suggestions of Marieke and Niek of Stibbe’s Financial Markets Group have been included in the bill submitted to Parliament. The bill is expected to enter into effect later this year.

Please see our consultation reaction by clicking here

and the Dutch bill by clicking here.

Marieke Driessen is a partner and Niek Groenendijk is a senior associate in the Financial Markets Group of Stibbe in Amsterdam. They regularly assist financial institutions and other financial market participants on financial market transactions and regulatory issues in relation thereto.

Team

Related news

20.12.2021 NL law
Verplichte rapportering door accountants over fraude en continuïteit in de controleverklaring

Short Reads - Aanleiding De onderwerpen “fraude” en “continuïteit” en de werkzaamheden die accountants verrichten rondom deze onderwerpen zijn zeer actueel. Op 13 september 2021 publiceerde de Nederlandse Beroepsorganisatie van Accountants (“NBA”) een consultatiedocument waarin werd voorgesteld dat accountants verplicht worden om altijd in aparte secties over fraude en continuïteit te rapporteren in de controleverklaring.

Read more

15.12.2021 NL law
Toepasselijkheid ESEF in verslaggeving vanaf boekjaar 2021

Short Reads - Aanleiding Het was aanvankelijk de bedoeling dat uitgevende instellingen hun jaarlijkse financiële verslaggeving over boekjaar 2020 in een uniform elektronisch verslaggevingsformaat (ESEF) zouden moeten publiceren. De Nederlandse wetgever heeft echter gebruikgemaakt van een door de Europese Commissie geboden uitstelmogelijkheid. Van uitgevende instellingen wordt verwacht dat zij verslaggeving vanaf boekjaar 2021 in ESEF publiceren. Deze alert geeft praktische tips op basis van de eerste praktijkervaringen met ESEF.

Read more