umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
Short Reads

Home, but not alone: Commission may complete dawn raids from home

Home, but not alone: Commission may complete dawn raids from home

Home, but not alone: Commission may complete dawn raids from home

03.09.2020 NL law

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has rejected Nexans’ appeal in the power cables cartel case. The Commission started the dawn raid at Nexans’ premises, but due to lack of time finished the raid at the Commission’s premises in Brussels. The ECJ found that the Commission can copy data and assess its relevance to the investigation at its own premises, while safeguarding companies’ rights of defence.

Therefore, in dawn raids where large volumes of data require processing, companies should be aware that the Commission could choose to take copies back to Brussels to continue its inspection there. The company’s counsel will need to be present during the assessment to ensure the Commission observes the rights of defence. In practice, this method may lead to longer and more exhaustive dawn raids. Additional costs resulting solely from the ‘move to Brussels’ should be reimbursed by the Commission based on a reasoned request from the company under investigation.

The dawn raid

As part of the power cables cartel investigation, the Commission conducted a dawn raid at Nexans’ premises. On the fourth and final day, the Commission made copies of an employee’s hard drive and took that data to its premises to assess its relevance to the investigation. The assessment that followed lasted for eight working days and took place in the presence of Nexans’ counsel. Nexans appealed the fining decision on a number of grounds, including that the Commission did not have the right to continue the investigation at its premises. The General Court rejected Nexans’ arguments, and consequently Nexans appealed to the ECJ.

The ECJ’s ruling

On appeal, the ECJ found that the Commission had the right to continue its dawn raid from its premises in Brussels. The ECJ considered that although not explicitly stated in law, such a right can be inferred from the Commission’s other powers of investigation. Conducting part of the inspection at the Commission premises does not infringe the company’s rights any further than continuing the dawn raid at the company’s premises.

However, the Commission’s choice to continue dawn raids at its premises is subject to limitations. The shift in premises must be justified, either by increased effectiveness of the inspection or by prevention of excessive interference in the operations of the investigated company. The Commission must agree to cover additional costs solely attributable to the shift incurred by the investigated company.

Practical implications

This alternative way of conducting dawn raids – partly at the company’s premises, partly at the Commission’s – will be relevant for cases where large volumes of data must be assessed. The prerequisite allocation of costs to the Commission should protect the investigated companies from cost increases based on the shift. However, in practice, dawn raids could become longer, giving more time to the Commission to assess the relevance of potentially incriminating documents. Additionally, counsel will need to keep a careful eye to ensure that the Commission properly observes the companies’ rights of defence in the Brussels setting.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of September 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:

Team

Related news

12.02.2021 EU law
After the Uber case and the Airbnb case … the Star Taxi App case: focus on the question of the qualification as “Information Society Service”

Articles - Societal and digital developments are reflected in the case law of the CJEU. For several years now, European judges resolve disputes relating to digital applications and the services they provide. On 3 December 2020, they handed down a judgment in a case concerning Star Taxi App. This blog analyses the Star Taxi App case law in the light of the Uber case law and the Airbnb case law. The three judgments have in common the question of the qualification of services as Information Society Services.  

Read more

04.02.2021 NL law
Game over? Gaming companies fined for geo-blocking

Short Reads - The Commission’s cross-border sales crusade seems far from over. The EUR 7.8 million fine imposed on distribution platform owner Valve and five PC video games publishers for geo-blocking practices is the most recent notch in the Commission’s belt. Food producer Mondelĕz may be next on the Commission’s hit list: a formal investigation into possible cross-border trade restrictions was opened recently.

Read more

04.02.2021 NL law
ECJ clarifies limits of antitrust limitation periods

Short Reads - Companies confronted with antitrust investigations and fines may find safeguard behind the rules governing limitation periods (often termed ‘statutes of limitation’). However, two preliminary rulings by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) show that those rules are not necessarily set in stone. According to the ECJ, national time limits relating to the imposition of antitrust fines may require deactivation if these limits result in a ‘systemic risk’ that antitrust infringements may go unpunished.

Read more

29.01.2021 NL law
Publicatie en inwerkingtreding Uitvoeringswet Screeningsverordening buitenlandse directe investeringen

Short Reads - Op 4 december 2020 is een uitvoeringswet in werking getreden die bepaalde elementen uit de Verordening screening van buitenlandse directe investeringen in de Unie regelt en zorgt dat Nederland voldoet aan de verplichtingen uit die verordening. Ook is er een conceptwetsvoorstel toetsing economie en nationale veiligheid verschenen. 

Read more