umraniye escort pendik escort
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
bodrum escort

Swimming in ECJ case law: The rocky journey to EU law applicability in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone

Swimming in ECJ case law: The rocky journey to EU law applicability in

Swimming in ECJ case law: The rocky journey to EU law applicability in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone

26.10.2020 EU law

Regarding activities taking place at sea, the applicability of EU law depends on the nature and geographic location of the activity as well as on the formulation of the geographical scope of the legal instrument.

With Member States’ ever increasing activity at sea, the ECJ is confronted with various questions on the application of EU law at sea; its case law is analysed in this article by Jaap Waverijn and Ceciel Nieuwenhout published in the leading EU law journal Common Market Law Review.

Firstly, the foundation of EU competence at sea in public international law and EU law is explored. Secondly, the line of ECJ case law is analysed. Thirdly, the interplay between the legislature’s formulations and the Court’s reasoning is addressed, as well as the validity of the latter in light of public international law. The article concludes by reflecting on the consequences of the Court’s reasoning, with recommendations regarding alternatives.

Click here to read the article. 

Click here to read the publication from RUG about this article. 

Swimming in ECJ case law: The rocky journey to EU law applicability in the continental shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone / J. Waverijn, C.T. Nieuwenhout (Bron: CMLR 56: 1623-1648, 2019)  (visible after login / registration)


Related news

07.04.2021 NL law
Het Schone Lucht Akkoord en de industrie: de overheid zet in op strengere emissie-eisen

Short Reads - Op 26 maart 2021 werd de uitvoeringsagenda Schone Lucht Akkoord aan de Tweede Kamer aangeboden. Hiermee wordt een aanzet gegeven naar het concretiseren van de emissiereductieafspraken die in het Schone Lucht Akkoord zijn neergelegd.  In dit blog gaan wij nader in op deze materie. In het bijzonder geven wij een overzicht van de maatregelen voor de industrie die in het Schone Lucht Akkoord en de uitvoeringsagenda zijn opgenomen en de stand van zaken omtrent de uitwerking van deze maatregelen in de praktijk.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
ECJ in Pometon: beware of too much info in staggered hybrid proceedings

Short Reads - In hybrid cartel proceedings (in which one party opts out of settlement), settlement decisions should not pre-judge the outcome of the Commission's investigation into non-settling parties. When the Commission publishes the settlement decision before the decision imposing a fine on the non-settling party, it must be careful in its drafting, the European Court of Justice confirmed. Furthermore, differences in the fining methodology applied to (similarly placed) settling and non-settling parties will have to be objectively justified and sufficiently reasoned.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Slovak Telekom: ECJ on essentials of the ‘essential facilities’ doctrine

Short Reads - Only dominant companies with a “genuinely tight grip” on the market can be forced to grant rivals access to their infrastructure. According to the ECJ’s rulings in Slovak Telekom and Deutsche Telekom, it is only in this scenario that the question of indispensability of the access for rivals comes into play. In the assessment of practices other than access refusal, indispensability may be indicative of a potential abuse of a dominant position, but is not a required condition.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Collective action stopped due to lack of benefit for class members

Short Reads - On 9 December 2020, the Amsterdam District Court (the “Court”) declared a foundation inadmissible in a collective action regarding alleged manipulation of LIBOR, EURIBOR and other interest rate benchmarks. The foundation sought declaratory judgments that Rabobank, UBS, Lloyds Bank and ICAP (the “defendants”) had engaged in wrongful conduct and unjust enrichment vis-à-vis the class members.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Pay-for-delay saga ends with nothing new; but pharma quest continues

Short Reads - On 25 March 2021, the ECJ ended the Lundbeck pay-for-delay saga by dismissing the appeals from Lundbeck and five generic manufacturers against a European Commission ‘pay-for-delay’ decision. Following its recent Paroxetine judgment, the ECJ found that Lundbeck’s process patents did not preclude generic companies being viewed as potential competitors, particularly since the patents did not represent an insurmountable barrier to entry. In addition, the patent settlement agreements constituted infringements "by object".

Read more