Neodyum Miknatis
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
Casino Siteleri
canli poker siteleri meritslot
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
Short Reads

This article has FIVE stars! New Dutch consumer rules to curb fake reviews

This article has FIVE stars!

This article has FIVE stars! New Dutch consumer rules to curb fake reviews

05.11.2020 NL law

Consumers often rely on online reviews to decide what bike to buy, where to eat or what article to read. But what if those reviews are fake? New Dutch rules were announced on 23 October 2020 seeking to ensure a higher level of consumer protection online. These rules mean more obligations for online traders, and potentially high fines if they get it wrong. For example, traders should implement procedures to ensure that published reviews originate from consumers who have genuinely used the product.

EU Directive 2019/2161 seeks to modernise EU consumer rules with a view to the emergence of the digital economy (see our previous blog). The Dutch Ministry of Economic affairs has now published the draft rules to implement this directive in the Netherlands.

The new rules implement EU Directive 2019/2161 and will be enforced from 28 May 2022 onwards. Time for online traders to check whether their current sales practices are in line with the upcoming rules or need further tweaking.

The draft legislation imposes a number of obligations on online platforms and other online businesses to ensure the protection of consumers’ rights. In addition, businesses are affirmatively required to provide various disclosures and information to consumers. The new rules include:

  • an obligation to inform consumers about the most important parameters used to determine the ranking of products on a platform; 
  • an obligation to inform consumers whether a trader has paid an online platform to increase the trader’s ranking in search results;
  • a requirement to disclose to consumers (before conclusion of the contract) whether the offer is personalised based on an algorithm (such as offering a higher price if a consumer visits a website from an expensive smartphone);
  • a duty to show the lowest price over the preceding thirty days, if a product is discounted;
  • online marketplaces must provide information on whether the supplier is a trader or a private individual, with a warning that EU consumer rules may not apply where relevant;
  • several longstanding consumer rules – such as the right of withdrawal for distance contracts – will now also apply to ‘free’ online services which require the consumer to provide personal data to a trader (such some social media networks).

Businesses will now also be obliged to take reasonable steps to ensure that a consumer has actually bought or used a product before it posts a review. Failing to do so could be considered an unfair trading practice. Fighting fake reviews has been a focus point for the Dutch competition authority (ACM) in the past.

Although the new rules will not be enforced before May 2022, they fit within a clear trend to enhance consumer protection online and to step up overall enforcement of consumer rules. The new rules will be enforced by the ACM and the Dutch financial authority (AFM) with maximum fines ranging up to 10% of a company’s total turnover. All the more reason for online traders to carefully check whether their current sales practices are in line with the upcoming rules or need further tweaking.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of November 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:

Related news

07.01.2021 NL law
Commission evaluates Antitrust Damages Directive: to be continued

Short Reads - On 14 December 2020, the Commission published a report on the implementation of the Antitrust Damages Directive (the Directive). The Commission observes a significant increase in antitrust damages actions since the adoption of the Directive. However, there is insufficient experience with the new Directive to properly evaluate its application. Instead, the Commission provides a concise overview of the implementation of some key aspects of the Directive.

Read more

07.01.2021 NL law
Amsterdam District Court puts a halt to unlimited forum shopping

Short Reads - On 25 November 2020, the Amsterdam District Court (the Court) declined jurisdiction over all non-Dutch defendants (the foreign defendants) in proceedings for compensation of damage based partly on an infringement of Article 101 TFEU. The proceedings were initiated by four public utility companies from the Gulf States (claimants) against both Dutch and foreign defendants.

Read more

07.01.2021 NL law
ACM study calls for regulation of Big Techs on payment market

Short Reads - The ACM’s market study, published on 1 December 2020, provides an overview of recent and upcoming developments concerning the role of Big Tech companies in both online and offline payment markets in the Netherlands. Although Big Tech companies currently have a relatively limited presence in these markets, the ACM expects significant expansion in the near future given these companies’ ability to leverage existing market power on other (platform) markets.

Read more

07.01.2021 NL law
Do the math: ACM publishes strategy on monitoring use algorithms

Short Reads - The ACM worries that the use of algorithms may lead to the creation of cartels, or nudge consumers towards a purchasing decision that is not in their best interest. Therefore, on 10 December 2020, it published a new policy document (in Dutch) setting out what businesses can expect when the ACM checks their algorithms. On the same day, the ACM also launched a trial with online music library Muziekweb to improve the ACM’s knowledge about the categories of data that are likely to be relevant in such investigations. All signs indicate the ACM’s intention to become more active in this area.

Read more

07.01.2021 NL law
(Geo)blockbuster: Canal+ ruling annuls commitment decision

Short Reads - A heads-up for companies seeking to settle in antitrust proceedings: commercially-affected third party complainants are not to be ignored. The Canal+ judgment marks the first time a commitment decision has been successfully challenged since the adoption of Regulation 1/2003. The European Court of Justice annulled the commitment decision on the ground that the Commission failed to take into account the rights of contractual parties affected by the commitments.

Read more