Short Reads

Swifter merger clearance and shorter merger filings in Belgium

Swifter merger clearance and shorter merger filings in Belgium

Swifter merger clearance and shorter merger filings in Belgium

05.03.2020 NL law

Companies can expect swifter merger clearance and simpler filing rules in Belgium. The Belgian Competition Authority has published a communication with additional rules concerning the simplified procedure for certain types of concentrations. As a result, a new category of concentrations will be eligible for a simplified merger filing, leading to swifter approval and lower costs. It will also allow the BCA to focus its resources on more problematic and complex files.

The Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) has published additional rules concerning the simplified procedure for concentrations. The communication extends the existing regime to include a new category of concentrations eligible for simplified filing.

In practice, on top of the existing category of eligible concentrations, the BCA can now also apply the simplified procedure in the following circumstances:

  • when the combined market share of all the parties to the concentration with horizontal links is less than 50% and the increase in the HHI index as a consequence of the concentration is less than 150;
  • when the combined horizontal market share is less than 50% and the incremental market share increase as a result of a concentration is below 2%.

Additionally, the BCA can apply the simplified procedure when it considers – in light of all the relevant circumstances – there to be no doubt about the admissibility of the concentration, and it does not lead to objections from the market, in the following two scenarios:

  • when two more parties to the concentration have activities in the same product and geographic market, and a combined market share between 25 and 40% at a horizontal level; or
  • when one or more parties involved in the concentration has activities in the product market upstream or downstream from the product market of one of the other parties, and the individual or combined market shares at one of these levels is between 25 and 40%.

As a result, more concentrations in Belgium will be eligible for application of the simplified procedure, thereby benefitting from a shorter decision-making period and simpler filing rules, leading to lower costs. It also implies that in such procedures the Competition College (the BCA’s ultimate decision-making body) will not need to convene because, in a simplified procedure, the examining officer (Auditeur/Auditor) alone can take such decision. This new procedure will therefore also allow the Competition College to concentrate on more important files.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of March 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:

Team

Related news

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Please share – ACM conditionally clears shared mobility platform merger

Short Reads - There may soon be a new competition tool available to tackle structural competition concerns in dynamic tech and platform markets. Until then, competition authorities resort to existing tools to deal with these markets. The Dutch competition authority (ACM) recently subjected the merger of two emerging platforms – without significant market footprint – to behavioural remedies. On 20 May 2020, the ACM cleared the merger between the travel apps of Dutch rail operator NS and transport company Pon.

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

Short Reads - Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
No proof of competitive disadvantage? No abusive favouritism

Short Reads - Companies claiming abuse of dominance in civil proceedings have their work cut out for them, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Real estate association VBO had accused dominant online platform Funda of favouritism. However, in line with the District Court’s earlier ruling, the Appeal Court dismissed the claim for insufficient evidence of negative effects on competition. The ruling confirms that the effect-based approach also applies in civil abuse claims, and that the standard of proof is high.    

Read more