Short Reads

Q&A guidance on revised Dutch tax ruling practice

Q&A guidance on revised Dutch tax ruling practice

Q&A guidance on revised Dutch tax ruling practice

09.03.2020 NL law

On 25 February 2020, the Dutch tax authorities have published a Q&A regarding the revised Dutch tax ruling practice. Although the Q&A is for information purposes only and no rights can be derived from the document, it provides some helpful guidance.

The Dutch tax ruling practice for tax rulings with an international character has been revised as from 1 July 2019 (see also our Tax Alert of 1 July 2019). This Q&A intends to give further guidance on this revised international ruling practice. In this Tax Alert we provide you with some key takeaways:

  • Tax avoidance
     
    • Under the revised ruling policy, an international tax ruling is not granted if the transaction for which the ruling is requested has the sole or decisive motive to avoid Dutch or foreign taxes. Based on the Q&A this avoidance aim is not restricted to corporate income tax and dividend withholding tax, but also other taxes should be taken into account in determining whether avoidance of tax is the sole or decisive motive for the transaction.
       
    • The ‘tax avoidance’ test mentioned above is not identical to the DAC6 ‘main benefit’ test and the ‘principal purpose’ test of the Multilateral Instrument. Hence, reporting a transaction under DAC6 does not necessarily mean that no tax ruling can be obtained.
       
  • Economic nexus
     
    • Under the revised ruling practice, an international tax ruling can only be obtained by companies that have sufficient 'economic nexus' with the Netherlands. Further to previous guidance in this respect, the Q&A describes whether a large international concern which has a foreign financial department (40 FTE) and a smaller financial department (10 FTE) in the Netherlands, has sufficient economic nexus in the Netherlands to obtain a ruling in respect of its financing activities. In case the 10 FTE perform relevant activities in respect of the financial flows through the Netherlands, there may be sufficient economic nexus. If such financial streams, however, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, do not match the functionality of the 10 FTE working in the Netherlands there will not be sufficient economic nexus. Besides, if foreign withholding taxes would be reduced in respect of the financial streams flowing through the Netherlands, it will depend on the relevant facts and circumstances whether the avoidance of foreign taxes could be considered the sole or decisive motive for the transaction.
       
    • Based on the Q&A there is sufficient economic nexus in the Netherlands to obtain a ruling regarding the application of the Dutch participation exemption, also if the entity applying for the ruling regarding the participation exemption itself does not employ the relevant personnel to manage the relevant participation(s), provided that the relevant personnel is made available within the group by a Dutch group entity.
       
  • Non-arm’s-length transaction: Based on the Q&A no tax international tax rulings are granted in respect of non-business like transactions prompted by shareholder motives.
     

Stibbe contributes Dutch chapter to Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2020

Lastly we are proud to share with you the Dutch chapter of the Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2020, that was written by Michael Molenaars, Jeroen Smits, Reinout de Boer and Rogier van der Struijk. Besides providing you with an outline of Dutch corporate income taxation, the chapter pays attention to the impact of ATAD and BEPS on the Dutch corporate income tax landscape.
 

Team

Related news

21.05.2020 NL law
Stibbe 'Netherlands Tax Firm of the Year'.

Inside Stibbe - The International Tax Review has chosen our Amsterdam Tax team as 'Netherlands Tax Firm of the Year'. This is Stibbe's fourth recognition in recent years, after receiving this distinguished title in 2015, 2017 and 2019.

Read more

28.04.2020 LU law
Chambers and Partners Real Estate Global Practice Guide 2020 - Luxembourg chapter

Articles - Claire-Marie Darnand, Victorien Hémery, Johan Léonard, Tom Storck, Benjamin Marthoz, Audrey Jarreton and François Bernard have all contributed to the 2020 Chambers and Partners Real Estate Global Practice Guide, providing the Luxembourg chapter. 

Read more

20.05.2020 NL law
Perpetual securities not considered equity for Dutch corporate income tax purposes

Short Reads - In a decision of Friday 15 May 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court confirmed that fixed-to-floating rate perpetual equity securities (“perpetual securities”) should not be considered a “participation loan” (deelnemerschapslening) for Dutch tax purposes. Under Dutch tax law, characterization of a debt instrument as a “participation loan” implies that such instrument is deemed equity for Dutch corporate income tax purposes. Characterization of the perpetual securities as a participation loan would have meant that the interest would have been regarded non-deductible dividend.

Read more

20.04.2020 NL law
Webinar on restructuring of corporate finance and distressed M&A

Seminar - The global COVID-19 crisis poses major challenges to many companies, their shareholders and financiers. On Thursday 23 April 2020 from 13.30 to 14.30 (CEST) Stibbe organizes a webinar on restructuring of corporate finance and distressed M&A. Stibbe partners Job van Hooff (Insolvency & Restructuring), Reinout de Boer (Tax) and Duco de Boer (Corporate | M&A) will discuss important issues and developments.

Read more

20.05.2020 NL law
Stibbe in Amsterdam answers questions from consumers, small business foundations and NGOs about the coronavirus [updated]

Inside Stibbe - In a special Q&A (in Dutch), lawyers from our Amsterdam office share their legal expertise and strive to provide answers to questions put to us by consumers, self-employed persons, enterprises large and small, foundations and NGOs as a result of the corona crisis.

Read more

18.04.2020 EU law
Report of advisory committee on taxation of multinationals in the Netherlands

Short Reads - On 5 June 2019, the Dutch Lower House of Parliament adopted a motion that called on the Government to initiate and set up a committee of experts (‘the Committee’) with the purpose to investigate measures that would make the taxation of profits of multinationals fairer, while the Netherlands would remain attractive for Dutch head offices. Last Wednesday (15 April 2020), the Dutch State Secretary of Finance sent the report of the Committee to the Dutch Lower House of Parliament.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring