Short Reads

European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

02.07.2020 NL law

The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

While the EU remains open to trade and (foreign) investment, that openness "must go hand in hand with fairness and predictable rules", states the Commission in a White Paper. On 17 June 2020, the European Commission adopted a White Paper on proposed rules countering subsidies, granted by non-EU governments to companies operating in the EU, that distort the EU Single Market. Existing EU State Aid rules dealing with public support granted by EU Member States do not apply to public support given by non-EU governments; the proposed rules aim to fill this perceived regulatory gap. The Commission is now seeking views on its proposal.

In its White Paper, the Commission proposes three ‘modules’ to address distortive effects caused by foreign subsidies:

  1. a general "catch all" instrument;
  2. an instrument dealing with foreign subsidies which facilitate the acquisition of EU targets; and
  3. an instrument tackling foreign subsidies in public procurement procedures.

The White Paper also addresses foreign subsidies in applications for EU funding (by which organisations can receive for instance financial support from the EU to carry out their projects).

The first module covers any form of subsidy that might distort the EU Single Market. If a preliminary review leads to a suspected market distortion, the competent authority (a national authority or the Commission) may decide to conduct an in-depth investigation and – depending on the outcome of such investigation – impose redress measures to remedy the distortive effect.

Modules 2 and 3 would involve a mandatory pre-closing notification mechanism. Under module 2, companies being subsidised by non-EU governments would be obliged to notify their acquisitions of EU companies (above a given threshold) to the Commission in order to obtain prior approval. If the Commission were to find that the acquisition was facilitated by foreign subsidy and would distort the EU Single Market, it could accept commitments to remedy the distortion, or prohibit the acquisition. Under module 3, bids in public procurement are scrutinised. Bidders would have to notify the contracting authority of financial support received from non-EU governments. If that support is held to be unfair, the bidder would be excluded from the procurement procedure and possibly from future procedures.

Finally, as regards EU funding, the Commission proposes that where a foreign subsidy forms part of winning contests for EU grants, it would apply a similar procedure to public procurement procedures.

These proposals would add another layer to controlling (foreign) companies doing business in the EU. For now, it will be interesting to see if and how these proposals are implemented, and how companies should account for this when doing business in the EU.

The public consultation is open until 23 September 2020 and the Commission aims to introduce a new legal instrument in 2021.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of July 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:

Related news

24.09.2021 EU law
Digital Law Up(to)date: (1) the download of a software with a permanent licence can constitute a “sale of goods”; (2) alert of the BEUC regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp and its new term of use

Articles - In this blog, we briefly present two interesting news in the field of digital law: (1) a judgment of the CJEU considering that the download of a software with a permanent licence can constitute a “sale of goods”, and (2) an alert of the BEUC regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp and its new terms of use.

Read more

09.09.2021 BE law
Digital Law Up(to)date: (1) Parliamentary initiatives about cyber attacks; (2) ‘Zero tariff’ options before the CJEU; and (3) Council of State, GDPR and encryption

Articles - In this blog, we briefly present three interesting news in the field of digital law: (1) Parliamentary initiatives to tackle cyber attacks (2) "Zero tariff" options and open internet access do not mix! (3) Council of State, GDPR and encryption: validation of a decision of the Flemish Authorities

Read more

26.08.2021 EU law
Facebook/Belgian DPA: Landmark ruling on cross-border enforcement under the GDPR

Short Reads - On 15 June 2021, the CJEU delivered an important judgment on the one-stop-shop mechanism. While the CJEU reinforced that the lead supervisory authority is the sole interlocutor in cross-border processing operations, it also contributed to the effective enforcement of the GDPR by reiterating the conditions under which supervisory authorities other than the lead supervisory authority can bring enforcement actions against such processing operations.

Read more

13.09.2021 NL law
Adopting the new Standard Contractual Clauses to secure international personal data transfers

Short Reads - Recently, the European Commission issued an implementing decision on standard new contractual clauses (“SCCs”) for the transfer of personal data to countries outside the European Economic Area. Organisations need to use the new SCCs from 27 September 2021 and onwards. Transitional periods apply for existing international data transfer agreements. To meet their obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation, organisations need to make the appropriate changes in time.

Read more