Articles

New deal for online deals - EU consumer protection adapted to the digital era

New deal for online deals - EU consumer protection adapted to the dig

New deal for online deals - EU consumer protection adapted to the digital era

08.01.2020 BE law

As part of the New Deal for Consumers, aimed to strengthen EU consumer protection in light of the digital era, a new Directive 2019/2161 of 27 November 2019 has been adopted. The Directive contains modernised rules in view of digital market developments such as the rise in online platforms.

As part of the New Deal for Consumers, aimed to strengthen EU consumer protection in light of the digital era, a new Directive 2019/2161 of 27 November 2019 has been adopted by the European Parliament and the Council (hereinafter the “Directive”). The Directive amends Council Directive Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directives 98/6/EC, 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU with a view to better enforcement and modernisation of EU consumer protection rules. The Directive contains modernised rules in view of digital market developments such as the rise in online platforms. A non-exhaustive overview of these modernised rules is briefly described below.

 

Safer online marketplaces

 

An online marketplace is a service using software, including a website or application, operated by or on behalf of a trader, which allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with other traders or consumers. As both private individuals (i.e. other consumers) and professional traders are offering goods and services via online marketplaces, the identity and capacity of whom you are purchasing from is often unclear. Since EU consumer protection rules only apply in B2C relations and not when buying from another consumer (C2C), this often entailed unpleasant surprises such as not being able to change your mind and exercising your right to withdrawal. 

 

The Directive brings more transparency to online marketplaces, allowing consumers to easier assess the risks. Online marketplaces must provide information on whether the supplier is a trader or another private individual, with a warning that EU consumer rules do not apply where relevant. With respect to search results, providers of online marketplaces must also provide transparency on their ranking criteria and must clearly disclose results that reflect paid advertisements.

“Free” digital services not so free anymore

Nowadays many digital services are offered for “free”, such as dating apps, social media platforms, cloud services, etc. While we do not actually pay for such services, the providers collect and monetize our data. As some important EU consumer rights only apply to services paid with money, such “free” services were not subject to those. The Directive considers that, given the similarities and interchangeability of paid digital services and digital services provided in exchange for personal data, they should be subject to the same rules.

Hence, the Directive also applies to so-called “free” digital services, i.e. contracts under which the trader supplies (or undertakes to supply) a digital service and the consumer provides (or undertakes to provide) personal data. However, an exception is provided for digital services whereby personal data are exclusively processed for the purpose of supplying the digital content or services or for meeting legal requirements, as the data are not further processed for other purposes and therefore do not have any additional value to the trader.

Consumer reviews: to trust or not to trust

When buying goods or services, or simply choosing which restaurant to go to, consumers increasingly rely on reviews and endorsements provided by other consumers on online platforms. Unfortunately, such reviews are not always genuine and consumers need to be protected against fake news.

The Directive now introduces new obligations to tackle this. Traders that use consumer reviews must clearly inform consumers on whether or not procedures ensuring the authenticity of reviews are in place and how the checks are made. Moreover, misleading consumers by stating that reviews of a product were submitted by actual consumers when no reasonable and proportionate steps were taken to ensure that this is the case (e.g. verifying the reliability by requesting additional information) must be considered as an unfair commercial practice.  

Trends

The Directive also includes rules with a view to empowering consumers with respect to their personal data (e.g. a right to access, retrieve and transfer data to another provider upon termination of an agreement) and with a view to better enforcement of consumer rights (e.g. fines of 4% of the trader’s annual turnover in case of “widespread infringements” and effective remedies). Such developments are very similar to the changes introduced by the General Data Protection Regulation with respect to data subjects.

The Directive enhances consumer protection online, including with respect to online platforms and marketplaces, as such in keeping with the trend to regulate online platforms. Whereas Regulation no. 2019/1150 introduced transparency requirements (e.g. with respect to ranking algorithms) between traders and online intermediaries, this Directive now imposes similar transparency requirements towards the customers and further completes the puzzle. See also our previous blogpost on the regulation of online platforms.

EU Member States must implement the Directive by 28 November 2021 and must apply the implemented measures as of 28 May 2022.

Team

Related news

24.09.2021 EU law
Digital Law Up(to)date: (1) the download of a software with a permanent licence can constitute a “sale of goods”; (2) alert of the BEUC regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp and its new term of use

Articles - In this blog, we briefly present two interesting news in the field of digital law: (1) a judgment of the CJEU considering that the download of a software with a permanent licence can constitute a “sale of goods”, and (2) an alert of the BEUC regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp and its new terms of use.

Read more

09.09.2021 BE law
Digital Law Up(to)date: (1) Parliamentary initiatives about cyber attacks; (2) ‘Zero tariff’ options before the CJEU; and (3) Council of State, GDPR and encryption

Articles - In this blog, we briefly present three interesting news in the field of digital law: (1) Parliamentary initiatives to tackle cyber attacks (2) "Zero tariff" options and open internet access do not mix! (3) Council of State, GDPR and encryption: validation of a decision of the Flemish Authorities

Read more

26.08.2021 BE law
Sarah De Wulf and Malik Baba co-authored a book dedicated to the legal aspects of the video-game industry

Articles - The book, entitled 'Legal Aspects of the video-game industry', provides a first answer to the most important legal questions that might arise in the lifecycle of a video-game company. These insights are intended to be applicable irrespective of jurisdictions, illustrated by real-life situations and easy to read for individuals without a legal background.

Read more

13.09.2021 NL law
Adopting the new Standard Contractual Clauses to secure international personal data transfers

Short Reads - Recently, the European Commission issued an implementing decision on standard new contractual clauses (“SCCs”) for the transfer of personal data to countries outside the European Economic Area. Organisations need to use the new SCCs from 27 September 2021 and onwards. Transitional periods apply for existing international data transfer agreements. To meet their obligations under the General Data Protection Regulation, organisations need to make the appropriate changes in time.

Read more

26.08.2021 EU law
Facebook/Belgian DPA: Landmark ruling on cross-border enforcement under the GDPR

Short Reads - On 15 June 2021, the CJEU delivered an important judgment on the one-stop-shop mechanism. While the CJEU reinforced that the lead supervisory authority is the sole interlocutor in cross-border processing operations, it also contributed to the effective enforcement of the GDPR by reiterating the conditions under which supervisory authorities other than the lead supervisory authority can bring enforcement actions against such processing operations.

Read more