Short Reads

Competition rules and globalisation to face off in 2020

Competition rules and globalisation to face off in 2020

Competition rules and globalisation to face off in 2020

09.01.2020 NL law

2020 will likely revolve around the question whether competition rules should yield to globalisation and digitisation, with suggestions ranging from mere tweaks to competition rules to complementary regulation. Greater cooperation across data protection, consumer protection and competition law appears inevitable. Speedier solutions in more informal settings may become a reality, alongside more frequent use of behavioural remedies.

 

Additional tools to supplement existing EU competition rules may lead to stricter regulation of non-EU state-supported companies. It remains to be seen precisely how the regulatory landscape will evolve, but companies should brace themselves for upcoming changes.

Updating existing tools

The European Commission is reviewing its competition tools in the face of continuous globalisation and digitisation. The Commission’s market definition notice will be reviewed and adjusted according to the changing scope of geographical markets and the changing nature of product markets. The increasing ease of global trade may lead to wider geographical markets, while the increasing availability of free products requires product market definitions to be based on factors such as quality, rather than price.

The importance of data is likely to play a more prominent role in merger reviews and the potential negative impact of ‘killer acquisitions’ will need to be examined further [see our November 2019 Newsletter]. Furthermore, the potential lock-in effects of big digital companies offering multiple services to consumers requires additional scrutiny; this issue is also high on the ACM’s 2020-2021 agenda, which designates fair access to these “ecosystems of services” and online platforms as one of the ACM’s 2020 key priorities.

In addition, the Commission’s rules on vertical agreements and horizontal agreements will be adapted to the digital age by specifically addressing the Commission’s approach to issues including dual pricing, online sales, online market places, the use of algorithms and the dual role of online platforms.

Adding new tools

However, competition law alone may not suffice to deal with all the challenges ahead. Additional regulation to ensure fair trading practices by online platforms will soon become applicable. Greater cooperation between regulatory authorities may be on the way [see our March 2018 Newsletter], potentially alongside vigorous enforcement in other fields (such as data protection) and further legislation where there are, according to Deputy Director-General Cecilio Madero Villarejo, “clearly defined and recurring issues that lead to systemic market failure.

Extra tools may be added to the existing EU competition law framework to prevent non-EU state-supported companies from disrupting the internal market’s level playing field. A white paper for an instrument on foreign subsidies is expected soon, while a recently published proposal suggests empowering the Commission to intervene if a ‘foreign’ company’s anti-competitive conduct is enabled through government support or excess profits from an unregulated dominant position in its own country.

Speedier solutions

Speedier solutions to keep up with fast-moving markets are also imminent [see our September 2019 Newsletter]. Reversing the burden of proof or lowering the required standard of proof in fast-moving markets is on the table; as is the more frequent use of interim measures to keep Big Tech in check. Imposing access requirements or restorative remedies may also soon be the order of the day. Furthermore, an ex ante intervention tool to pre-emptively deal with online gatekeepers’ potential anti-competitive conduct could mitigate the need for speed [see our November 2019 Newsletter].

The list of suggestions and proposals seems almost endless, and the precise way forward remains unclear. However, one thing is for sure: things are bound to change in 2020 – and companies had better brace themselves.

 

This article was published in the Competition Newsletter of January 2020. Other articles in this newsletter:

 

Team

Related news

09.01.2020 NL law
Deleting WhatsApp chats during dawn raids may cost you dearly

Short Reads - Companies should be aware that the Dutch competition authority (ACM) will not only examine electronic records and emails, but can also check WhatsApp messages during dawn raids. The ACM recently imposed a fine of EUR 1.84 million on a company for non-cooperation with a dawn raid; its highest fine so far for non-cooperation. Several of the company’s employees had left WhatsApp groups and deleted chats before handing over their mobile phones for inspection.

Read more

16.01.2020 NL law
De Amsterdamse milieuzone voor brom- en snorfietsen: voertuigen van een bepaald jaar weren is mogelijk bij ontbreken van een redelijk alternatief

Short Reads - ABRvS 20 november 2019, ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:3865 Deze blog is het vierde deel in een reeks Stibbeblogs over gemeentelijke milieuzones. In 2017 oordeelde de Afdeling over de milieuzone voor personen- en bestelauto’s met dieselmotoren in Utrecht. In 2018 presenteerde de staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat haar beleid voor harmonisatie van uiteenlopende gemeentelijke milieuzones. Een jaar geleden maakten wij in een FAQ de balans op over de harmonisatie van milieuzones.

Read more

09.01.2020 NL law
Access to the file in Dutch competition procedures: too little too late?

Short Reads - Companies beware: the ACM’s and European Commission’s approach to access to the file are not aligned. According to an interim relief judge, the ACM cannot be forced to grant a company access to a broader set of documents in competition procedures. A potential error in the administrative procedure can be remedied before a court at a later stage. This is different to the right to access to the Commission’s file during administrative procedures, as acknowledged in EU case law.

Read more

10.01.2020 NL law
Is het mededingingsrecht de reddingsboei van zwakke zzp’ers?

Articles - Het toenemende aantal zzp'ers heeft ook mededingingsrechtelijke gevolgen. Volgens de ACM werkt de markt namelijk niet goed als zzp'ers door lage uurtarieven onder het bestaansminimum komen. Jan Truijens Martinez en Simone Evans bespreken in het Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsrecht in Context hoe eventuele belemmeringen die het mededingingsrecht opwerpt bij de bescherming van zzp'ers kunnen worden beperkt en of het mededingingsrecht eigenlijk wel het juiste instrument daarvoor is? 

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring