Seminar

Symposium 'From Stint to Fipronil: a compensation fund for victims of energetic government intervention in crisis situations

Symposium 'From Stint to Fipronil: a compensation fund for victims of

Symposium 'From Stint to Fipronil: a compensation fund for victims of energetic government intervention in crisis situations

07.11.2019

Stibbe is organising a symposium in Amsterdam on Thursday 7 November entitled 'From Stint to Fipronil: a compensation fund for victims of energetic government intervention in crisis situations'. During this symposium, Stibbe lawyer Tijn Kortmann and Prof. Pieter van Vollenhoven, alongside other experts,  will speak about the compensation fund which, according to van Vollenhoven, injured parties should be able to call upon if a decision by the government turns out to be too drastic.

From Stint to Fipronil

In 2019, citizens expect the government to monitor their health and safety. The government must warn citizens of dangers and must prevent accidents and disasters through adequate supervision and energetic intervention. The government does this regularly; well-known recent examples include the warning concerning Fipronil-infected eggs, and the removal of the Stint from the road after the dramatic accident in Oss.

The government often intervenes when there is still great uncertainty about the actual risks to health and safety. With the adage 'prevention is better than cure' this can be justified, but what if afterwards it turns out that a cannon has been used to shoot a mosquito (or the wrong bear)? For example, the producer of eggs, or the manufacturer of the Stint and their customers, can try to recover the damage from the government, but many requirements have to be met for government liability. Moreover, the road to government liability is long and costly.

The Van Vollenhoven compensation fund

Prof. Pieter van Vollenhoven, former chairman of the OVV, is of the opinion that innocent victims in such a case should be able to appeal to a compensation fund that is generous in its approach. Can a compensation fund indeed provide a solution for cases of this kind, and if so, when is a compensation fund a suitable instrument? Who should take the initiative for such a compensation fund and what criteria and procedures should apply to compensation from such a fund?

Practical Information

Date: 7 November 2019 (14:30 - 17:00)

Location: Stibbe, Beethovenplein 10, 1077 WM Amsterdam

For registration or for more information, please contact: Stibbeevents@stibbe.com. Participation in the Masterclass is free of charge.

Team

Related news

24.01.2020
Can the government refrain from imposing enforcement measures if it is not within the offender’s power to comply with a standard?

Short Reads - What should be done if a stakeholder makes a request to the government for enforcement to rectify violations in a scenario where the offender does not have full power to comply because of a reliance on third parties? The Administrative Division of the Dutch Council of State ruled on 23 January 2019 that an administrative body cannot simply reject an enforcement request in such a situation, but must consider whether, for example, the imposition of an order subject to a penalty payment may provide an incentive for the actual termination of the violation.

Read more

16.01.2020
De Amsterdamse milieuzone voor brom- en snorfietsen: voertuigen van een bepaald jaar weren is mogelijk bij ontbreken van een redelijk alternatief

Short Reads - ABRvS 20 november 2019, ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:3865 Deze blog is het vierde deel in een reeks Stibbeblogs over gemeentelijke milieuzones. In 2017 oordeelde de Afdeling over de milieuzone voor personen- en bestelauto’s met dieselmotoren in Utrecht. In 2018 presenteerde de staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat haar beleid voor harmonisatie van uiteenlopende gemeentelijke milieuzones. Een jaar geleden maakten wij in een FAQ de balans op over de harmonisatie van milieuzones.

Read more

16.01.2020
Wetgever, koester het burgerlijk procesrecht

Articles - Civiele procedures worden waarschijnlijk niet sneller en eenvoudiger met het Conceptwetsvoorstel modernisering en vereenvoudiging bewijsrecht en de Tijdelijke Experimentenwet rechtspleging. De wetsvoorstellen gaan uit van onjuiste veronderstellingen over het verloop van civielrechtelijke procedures en overspannen verwachtingen van de rol van de civiele rechter als alvermogende geschilbeslechter.

Read more

20.01.2020
Planologische medewerking mag worden geweigerd als initiatiefnemer zich in strijd met gemeentelijk beleid onvoldoende heeft ingespannen voor draagvlak

Short Reads - De Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State heeft op 18 december 2019 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:4209) overwogen dat een bestuursorgaan geen planologische medewerking hoeft te verlenen aan de wijziging van een bestemmingsplan als de aanvrager zich niet heeft ingespannen om maatschappelijk draagvlak te creëren.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring