Short Reads

Can I retrieve information from a Dutch administrative body?

Can I retrieve information from a Dutch administrative body?

Can I retrieve information from a Dutch administrative body?

28.03.2019 NL law

The Government Information Public Access Act (Government Information Act) ensures that everyone in the Netherlands can retrieve information from administrative bodies. When requesting information it is important to take into account the points and practical tips outlined below

Is the Government Information Act applicable? Or does another regulation apply?

Before submitting an information request under the Government Information Act, it is advisable to check first whether the desired information must be made public under this legislation or whether another regulation applies.

The Government Information Act concerns the disclosure of requested information held by administrative bodies. It is, however, quite possible that other specific rules about the public nature of the desired information apply and the information will not be available under the provisions in the Government Information Act. An example is section 2.57 of the Procurement Act 2012, which, among other things, stipulates that a contracting authority cannot disclose confidential information that has been provided by an entrepreneur. It follows from this provision that if an economic operator designates the information provided by it to a contracting authority as confidential, the information cannot be disclosed. In this case, the Government Information Act will not apply.

Is the information already publicly available?

It is also advisable to check whether the information has been previously disclosed. The case law on this topic stipulates that the disclosure obligation under the Government Information Act does not relate to information that is already in the public domain. If the information is not public, a request under the Government Information Act can be made.

Where is an information request submitted?

A request based upon the Government Information Act is submitted to the administrative body that has the desired information. For example, this could include a minister, administrative bodies of provinces, such as provincial councils and administrative bodies of municipalities (e.g. the Mayor and Aldermen). The request can also be submitted to (private) institutions operating under the responsibility of an administrative body. Based on this criterion, the administrative court, for example, has ruled that the Government Information Act applied to ID-Lelystad BV, which is a private company. If the request is submitted (by mistake) to an administrative body other than where the documents are based, the administrative body is under a duty to forward the request to the correct authority.

Requirements regarding an information request

A request based upon the Government Information Act can be submitted in writing or verbally. The request must state the administrative matter or the related document which is related to the information request. An administrative matter concerns the policies of an administrative body, including preparation and execution. For example, documents related to how the Municipal Health Service (GGD) performs its duties, such as correspondence between the GGD and an alderman.

In the request, it is advisable to explain why the documents should be made public on the basis of the Government Information Act. If the request does not refer to the Government Information Act, the administrative body may not assess the request on this basis. There are also some other limitations. If, for example, information is requested in the context of a procedure before the administrative courts (section 8:42 of the General Administrative Law Act), in which this information is not intended to be publicly available, the Government Information Act will not apply. A reference to the Government Information Act does not guarantee that an information request is considered as a formal request based upon the Government Information Act by the administrative body.

Grounds for exemption and restrictions

The Government Information Act is based on the principle that information is public, unless there is an important reason for it not to be disclosed. As a result, certain restrictions are imposed on  public access to information. The Government Information Act contains grounds for exemptions and restrictions on disclosure. The grounds regarding exceptions on disclosure fall into absolute and relative grounds.

If there is an absolute ground for refusal of a request, the information cannot be disclosed. This is the case when 'the unity of the Crown' is in danger, the security of the State is threatened, the information concerns confidential business and manufacturing data communicated to the government or when the information concerns special personal data.

Unlike the absolute grounds for exemption, the relative grounds for exemption must be weighed up against the general importance of public disclosure. The information cannot be disclosed if its importance does not outweigh the interest that the ground of exemption aims to protect. The Government Information Act includes an exhaustive list of interests for exemption, including the investigation and prosecution of criminal offenses and the respect for privacy.

Restrictions only apply to documents intended for internal deliberation. When the requested information has been drawn up for the purpose of internal deliberation, no information is provided on personal policy views in the internal deliberation. An example of this is a preparatory administrative policy document. In this case, there is no room for weighing up interests. However, an exception applies to environmental internal information. In the case of environmental information, the importance of the protection of the personal policy views is weighed up against the importance of disclosure. Furthermore, information about personal policy views can be provided in non-identifiable forms.

Legal protection

If the applicant of an information request does not agree with the decision of an administrative body to not or to partially disclose information, the applicant will have access to administrative legal protection. First an objection with the administrative body can be made, after which appeal and higher appeal may be possible.

Team

Related news

07.11.2019 NL law
Symposium 'From Stint to Fipronil: a compensation fund for victims of energetic government intervention in crisis situations

Seminar - Stibbe is organising a symposium in Amsterdam on Thursday 7 November entitled 'From Stint to Fipronil: a compensation fund for victims of energetic government intervention in crisis situations'. During this symposium, Stibbe lawyer Tijn Kortmann and Prof. Pieter van Vollenhoven, alongside other experts,  will speak about the compensation fund which, according to van Vollenhoven, injured parties should be able to call upon if a decision by the government turns out to be too drastic.

Read more

15.10.2019 BE law
Avis du Maître architecte et organisation d’une réunion de projet. De nouvelles étapes préalables à la demande de permis d’urbanisme.

Articles - Une des nouveautés de la réforme du CoBAT adoptée le 30 novembre 2017, publiée au Moniteur belge le 20 avril 2018 et entrée en vigueur le 1er septembre 2019 (pour ce qui concerne les demandes de permis d’urbanisme) porte sur la création de deux nouvelles étapes préalables à l’introduction d’une demande de permis d’urbanisme : l’obtention de l’avis du Maître architecte, d’une part, et l’organisation d’une réunion de projet, d’autre part. 

Read more

14.10.2019 NL law
Kamerdebat over digitalisering van de overheid: aandacht voor bescherming burger vereist

Short Reads - Op 24 september 2019 zijn er vier moties in stemming gebracht én aangenomen door de Tweede Kamer. De moties hebben als gemeenschappelijke deler dat ze in het teken staan van de steeds groter wordende digitalisering bij de overheid. Het achterliggende doel van de moties is dat de burger voldoende beschermd moet worden tegen deze digitalisering.

Read more

15.10.2019 NL law
Een nieuwe uittredingsregeling voor gemeenschappelijke regelingen

Short Reads - Op 26 augustus 2019 is de internetconsultatie gestart van een wetsvoorstel dat de Wet gemeenschappelijke regelingen (Wgr) wijzigt. Het wetsvoorstel heeft als doel de democratische legitimiteit van gemeenschappelijke regelingen te versterken. In een eerder bericht gingen wij al in op eerdere initiatieven om de Wgr te wijzigen en op de in het wetsvoorstel voorgestelde maatregelen, waarbij zeggenschap over de begroting werd uitgelicht

Read more

08.10.2019 NL law
Annotatie bij ABRvS 26 juni 2019, waarin de Afdeling een vereniging als belanghebbende aanmerkt

Short Reads - Op 26 juni 2019 heeft de Afdeling twee uitspraken gedaan over de vraag of een vereniging die opkomt voor werknemers als belanghebbende als in artikel 1:2, derde lid, Awb kan worden aangemerkt. De Afdeling oordeelde dat medewerkers in beginsel niet als belanghebbende kunnen worden aangemerkt. Maar in tegenstelling tot de rechtbanken van Amsterdam en Limburg, oordeelde de Afdeling ook dat een uitzondering hierop kan worden gemaakt. 

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring