Short Reads

Can I retrieve information from a Dutch administrative body?

Can I retrieve information from a Dutch administrative body?

Can I retrieve information from a Dutch administrative body?

28.03.2019 NL law

The Government Information Public Access Act (Government Information Act) ensures that everyone in the Netherlands can retrieve information from administrative bodies. When requesting information it is important to take into account the points and practical tips outlined below

Is the Government Information Act applicable? Or does another regulation apply?

Before submitting an information request under the Government Information Act, it is advisable to check first whether the desired information must be made public under this legislation or whether another regulation applies.

The Government Information Act concerns the disclosure of requested information held by administrative bodies. It is, however, quite possible that other specific rules about the public nature of the desired information apply and the information will not be available under the provisions in the Government Information Act. An example is section 2.57 of the Procurement Act 2012, which, among other things, stipulates that a contracting authority cannot disclose confidential information that has been provided by an entrepreneur. It follows from this provision that if an economic operator designates the information provided by it to a contracting authority as confidential, the information cannot be disclosed. In this case, the Government Information Act will not apply.

Is the information already publicly available?

It is also advisable to check whether the information has been previously disclosed. The case law on this topic stipulates that the disclosure obligation under the Government Information Act does not relate to information that is already in the public domain. If the information is not public, a request under the Government Information Act can be made.

Where is an information request submitted?

A request based upon the Government Information Act is submitted to the administrative body that has the desired information. For example, this could include a minister, administrative bodies of provinces, such as provincial councils and administrative bodies of municipalities (e.g. the Mayor and Aldermen). The request can also be submitted to (private) institutions operating under the responsibility of an administrative body. Based on this criterion, the administrative court, for example, has ruled that the Government Information Act applied to ID-Lelystad BV, which is a private company. If the request is submitted (by mistake) to an administrative body other than where the documents are based, the administrative body is under a duty to forward the request to the correct authority.

Requirements regarding an information request

A request based upon the Government Information Act can be submitted in writing or verbally. The request must state the administrative matter or the related document which is related to the information request. An administrative matter concerns the policies of an administrative body, including preparation and execution. For example, documents related to how the Municipal Health Service (GGD) performs its duties, such as correspondence between the GGD and an alderman.

In the request, it is advisable to explain why the documents should be made public on the basis of the Government Information Act. If the request does not refer to the Government Information Act, the administrative body may not assess the request on this basis. There are also some other limitations. If, for example, information is requested in the context of a procedure before the administrative courts (section 8:42 of the General Administrative Law Act), in which this information is not intended to be publicly available, the Government Information Act will not apply. A reference to the Government Information Act does not guarantee that an information request is considered as a formal request based upon the Government Information Act by the administrative body.

Grounds for exemption and restrictions

The Government Information Act is based on the principle that information is public, unless there is an important reason for it not to be disclosed. As a result, certain restrictions are imposed on  public access to information. The Government Information Act contains grounds for exemptions and restrictions on disclosure. The grounds regarding exceptions on disclosure fall into absolute and relative grounds.

If there is an absolute ground for refusal of a request, the information cannot be disclosed. This is the case when 'the unity of the Crown' is in danger, the security of the State is threatened, the information concerns confidential business and manufacturing data communicated to the government or when the information concerns special personal data.

Unlike the absolute grounds for exemption, the relative grounds for exemption must be weighed up against the general importance of public disclosure. The information cannot be disclosed if its importance does not outweigh the interest that the ground of exemption aims to protect. The Government Information Act includes an exhaustive list of interests for exemption, including the investigation and prosecution of criminal offenses and the respect for privacy.

Restrictions only apply to documents intended for internal deliberation. When the requested information has been drawn up for the purpose of internal deliberation, no information is provided on personal policy views in the internal deliberation. An example of this is a preparatory administrative policy document. In this case, there is no room for weighing up interests. However, an exception applies to environmental internal information. In the case of environmental information, the importance of the protection of the personal policy views is weighed up against the importance of disclosure. Furthermore, information about personal policy views can be provided in non-identifiable forms.

Legal protection

If the applicant of an information request does not agree with the decision of an administrative body to not or to partially disclose information, the applicant will have access to administrative legal protection. First an objection with the administrative body can be made, after which appeal and higher appeal may be possible.

Team

Related news

10.08.2020 NL law
Geelgroen huis in Den Helder in ernstige mate in strijd met de redelijke eisen van welstand

Short Reads - In de gemeentelijke welstandsnota staan criteria waaraan het uiterlijk van bestaande en nieuw te bouwen woningen dienen te voldoen: de redelijke eisen van welstand. Voor bestaande woningen geldt dat zij niet in ernstige mate in strijd mogen zijn met deze eisen. Welstandsexcessen zijn met andere woorden uitgesloten. In de uitspraak van de Afdeling van 15 juli 2020 was de vraag aan de orde of een geelgroen geverfde woning in Den Helder terecht als een dergelijk welstandsexces is aangemerkt.

Read more

10.08.2020 NL law
Het NOW register: openbaarmaking van gegevens van ontvangers van de NOW-subsidie

Short Reads - Het UWV heeft op verzoek van de minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid een register gepubliceerd met informatie over werkgevers die de NOW-1 subsidie hebben ontvangen. De publicatie van dit register komt niet geheel als een verrassing. De NOW-1 bevat immers een bijzondere bepaling over openbaarmaking van de desbetreffende gegevens.

Read more

27.07.2020 NL law
Maatwerk bij ontvankelijkheidsbeslissingen

Short Reads - Kent u een termijn die de ontvankelijkheid van een bezwaar of beroep bepaalt en niet in de wet is te vinden? Je zou hopen dat zo’n termijn niet bestaat. Ontvankelijkheid bepaalt immers de toegang tot de rechter en die toegang moet niet belemmerd worden door onbekende of slecht kenbare fatale termijnen. Toch kent ons recht zo’n termijn en die termijn is bovendien zeer kort. Ik doel op de twee weken die een belanghebbende wordt gegund om alsnog bezwaar te maken, nadat hij op de hoogte is geraakt van het bestaan van een besluit waarvan de bezwaartermijn al is verstreken.

Read more

05.08.2020 NL law
ACM is verplicht om het besluit waarin zij afziet tot oplegging van een boete te publiceren

Short Reads - De Instellingswet Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Instellingswet ACM) verplicht de ACM om een besluit waarbij een ernstige overtreding (zoals overtreding van het kartelverbod) is geconstateerd, maar waarbij is afgezien van het opleggen van een boete toch openbaar te maken. Een dergelijk besluit beschouwt het CBb als een beschikking tot het opleggen van een bestuurlijke sanctie in de zin van artikel 12v van de Instellingswet ACM. Dat oordeelt het CBb in haar uitspraak van 18 februari 2020 (ECLI:NL:CBB:2020:92).

Read more

27.07.2020 NL law
De Whatsapp-conversatie tussen Grapperhaus en Halsema: ook openbaar via de Wob?

Short Reads - Deze heb je vastgelegd voor de Wob Zo luidde een van de berichten van de Whatsapp-correspondentie tussen burgemeester Halsema van Amsterdam en minister Grapperhaus van Justitie en Veiligheid over de demonstratie op de Dam, die plaatsvond op 1 juni 2020. Een angst van menig bestuurder werd waarheid: de gehele conversatie stond dezelfde dag nog afgedrukt op alle nieuwswebsites. Deze correspondentie werd openbaar gemaakt op grond van artikel 68 van de Grondwet, dat kort gezegd de informatieplicht van bewindslieden aan het parlement regelt.

Read more