Short Reads

Dutch Financial Regulators recommend a Dutch national licensing regime for crypto exchange platforms and crypto wallet providers

Dutch Financial Regulators recommend a Dutch national licensing regim

Dutch Financial Regulators recommend a Dutch national licensing regime for crypto exchange platforms and crypto wallet providers

24.01.2019 NL law

On 18 January 2019, the Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank, "DNB") and the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Stichting Autoriteit Financiële Markten, the "AFM") published their joint advice recommending a Dutch national licensing regime for crypto exchange platforms and crypto wallet providers, and the amendment of the European regulatory framework to enable the offering and trading of cryptos that are comparable to shares or bonds, which can provide opportunities for SME funding.

In this short read, Roderik Vrolijk and Soeradj Ramsanjhal, both senior-associates in the Financial Regulatory practice of Stibbe, summarise what the Dutch regulators' proposals entail.

Summary of the proposal

DNB and the AFM have sent their advice to the Dutch Minister of Finance, who forwarded it to the Dutch House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer). Given the international nature of cryptos, the advice contains two specific recommendations.

Proposed introduction of a national licensing regime for crypto exchange platforms and crypto wallet providers

Both the AFM and DNB have repeatedly warned about the risks of deception, fraud, manipulation and cybercrime associated with cryptos and initial coin offerings (ICOs). Cryptocurrency markets are potentially vulnerable to a wide range of criminal activity and financial crimes. Many of these risks materialize in the surrounding ecosystem of issuers, virtual currency exchanges and virtual wallets that support consumer access to the cryptocurrency markets.

The Fourth European Anti-Money Laundering Directive (Directive (EU) 2015/849) has been revised to address these risks. To this extent, the revised Money Laundering Directive (Directive (EU) 2018/843) will also apply the 'know-your-customer' and reporting of unusual transaction requirements to platforms that enable the exchange of cryptos to fiat money, as well as to crypto wallet providers. The revised Money Laundering Directive must be implemented in the EU Member States by 10 January 2020) .

To mitigate the related risks at a national level, the AFM and DNB recommend introducing a licensing regime under the Dutch Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act (Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financiering van terrorisme, the "Wwft"). The AFM and DNB are of the opinion that this will allow preventative assessment – and rejection – of potential market parties that cannot adequately address the AML-risks related to cryptos.

We believe however that a licence requirement for crypto exchange platforms and crypto wallet providers , if introduced, belongs in the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht, the "Wft"), rather than in the Wwft. The structure and purpose of the Wft seem more apt to introduce such licencing regime, since the Wwft has been written with the primary aim to prevent terrorism financing and money-laundering.

Proposed amendment of the European regulatory framework for capital market funding

The AFM and DNB also see the advantages of disruptive technologies, such as blockchain. They expect that, insofar as the particular crypto offered presents a clear and enforceable right (as is the case with shares and bonds), corporate funding through cryptos may eventually grow into a supplemental form of capital market funding.

To this extent, the AFM and DNB recommend amending the European regulatory framework for corporate funding to enable the use of cryptos that are comparable to shares or bonds. This will require proportionate rules for trading as well as amendments to the rules for custody and settlement in order to prevent them from unnecessarily reducing the benefits of blockchain technology, as I the case under the current EU regulatory framework.

At a national level, the AFM and DNB propose to bring the Dutch definition of a security in line with the broader definition used in other pieces of European legislation. This will allow the AFM to bring specific cryptos under the scope of its supervision and to offer investors a level of protection against these activities similar to the level of protection available for other regulated activities.


Related news

11.04.2019 NL law
The Dutch UBO register will be introduced in January 2020

Short Reads - On 4 April 2019, a legislative proposal to implement the Dutch Ultimate Beneficial Owner (''UBO'') register (''UBO register'') was submitted to the Dutch parliament. The obligation to introduce a UBO register derives from the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive as amended by the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive. Approximately 1.5 million Dutch legal entities must register information on their UBOs in this register.

Read more

12.03.2019 LU law
Entry into force of the RBE Regulation and update

Articles - The Grand-Ducal Regulation of 15 February 2019 on the registration, payment of administrative fees and access to information recorded in the register of beneficial owners (the “RBE Regulation”) entered into force on 1 March 2019 and depicts the practical aspects of the Law of 13 January 2019 establishing a beneficial owner register (the “RBE Law”). Another document, the LBR Circular 19/01 (the “Circular”) issued by the Luxembourg Business Registers on 25 February 2019  further describes the new register of beneficial owners (the “RBE”) with the aim of helping users. 

Read more

21.03.2019 NL law
15 aspects of Brexit you did not know

Short Reads - A Brexit without a deal, or with a deal that does not cover all relevant aspects, is still a potential scenario. We have highlighted a number of unexpected legal consequences of Brexit in such a no deal or incomplete deal scenario.

Read more

13.03.2019 NL law
Financial Services Disputes in the Netherlands

Articles - What are the most common causes of actions taken by or against financial institutions and service providers in Dutch jurisdiction? Who has a right of action in financial services disputes? Does it make a difference if the customer is an individual or a commercial entity? Is there a specialist court or specialist judges for financial services litigation? Roderik Vrolijk and Daphne Rijkers provide answers to these and other questions about financial services disputes in the Netherlands.

Read more

22.02.2019 BE law
Lost your passport - How a hard Brexit will affect UK financial institutions’ access to the Belgian financial market

Articles - FSMA gives local guidance - Belgian legislature prepares contingency measures The UK is due to leave the European Union on 29 March 2019. Unless specific arrangements granting the UK at least a temporary status quo will be adopted before 29 March 2019, the UK financial industry will be considered third-country entities and will therefore be seriously restricted in carrying on their activities in the EEA, including Belgium.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring