umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Short Reads

Legislative proposal for mass damages claims approved by the Dutch House of Representatives

Legislative proposal for mass damages claims approved by the Dutch Ho

Legislative proposal for mass damages claims approved by the Dutch House of Representatives

06.02.2019 NL law

On 29 January 2019, the Dutch House of Representatives approved the legislative proposal that introduces collective actions for damages under article 3:305a of the Dutch Civil Code (DCC). This proposal aims to amend article 3:305a DCC to enable collective actions for damages on an 'opt-out' basis.

The legislative proposal allows for such claims provided that the requirements of article 3:305a DCC are met. If a claim is successful, the judge determines the amount of damages in one go, so that the case can be dealt with for a large group of class members at the same time. Not every claim organization can file a collective claim for damages. The legislative proposal includes conditions regarding the organization and funding of organizations that wish to initiate a collective action.

The House of Representatives approved several amendments to an earlier version of the legislative proposal. These amendments aimed to introduce a requirement that mass damages claims should be closely connected to the Dutch jurisdiction, the possibility to order a claimant to pay additional costs to the other party in the case of an ill-founded claim, stricter admissibility requirements for (very) small claims and claims with an idealistic purpose and an improvement of the transitional provisions of the legislative proposal.

The amendment relating to the transitional provisions of the legislative proposal ensures that collective actions for damages will only be admissible if they relate to "events" that occurred on or after 15 November 2016 (the day the draft proposal was submitted to the House of Representatives). An amendment that would have made it possible for a court in some cases to order that class members must opt-in before they could become bound to a collective action judgment or settlement was rejected.

The Senate will now discuss the bill. Once the bill is approved by the Senate, the date of entry into force will be announced.

For more detailed information about the legislative proposal see the previously published Overview of Legislative Proposal on Collective Action (NL) by Jeroen Kortmann.

Team

Related news

29.01.2021 NL law
Publicatie en inwerkingtreding Wet ongewenste zeggenschap telecommunicatie

Short Reads - Op 12 juni 2020 is een wet gepubliceerd om ongewenste overnames in de telecommunicatiesector tegen te gaan: de Wet ongewenste zeggenschap telecommunicatie. Deze wet (die de vorm heeft van een nieuw hoofdstuk in de Telecommunicatiewet) moet volgens de memorie van toelichting voorkomen dat een op basis van geopolitieke motieven handelende partij een te grote invloed krijgt op Nederlandse telecommunicatiepartijen.

Read more

28.01.2021 NL law
Negotiating a contract under conditions; subject to approval

Short Reads - In Dutch legal practice, one of the most common conditions is the reservation of approval or the “subject to approval” clause. A “subject to approval” clause provides a condition under which an agreement will be concluded (totstandkomingsvoorwaarde), a suspensive condition (opschortende voorwaarde) or a resolutive condition (ontbindende voorwaarde). This depends on the wording of the clause and the circumstances of the case.

Read more

27.01.2021 NL law
Overzichtsuitspraak ABRvS: overmacht en de wettelijke dwangsommen wegens niet tijdig beslissen. Hoe werkt dat?

Short Reads - Overmacht bij een bestuursorgaan schort beslistermijnen en wettelijke dwangsomtermijnen zelfstandig op. Ook als een bestuursorgaan daarvan geen mededeling stuurt. Dat oordeelt de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State (de Afdeling) in een overzichtsuitspraak van 16 december 2020. In dit blogbericht gaan wij nader in op de achtergrond van die uitspraak en duiden wij wat dit betekent voor de praktijk.

Read more