umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Short Reads

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new procedural rules

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new procedural rules

05.08.2019 NL law

On 1 October 2019, legislation will enter into force ending the KEI pilot scheme for digital litigation at the courts of Gelderland and Central Netherlands (Midden-Nederland). However, certain new procedural rules, which were part of the digitalisation pilot, will remain in force and will apply to all Dutch courts.

End of digital litigation

The pilot for digital litigation started on 1 September 2017 for claims with mandatory legal representation at the courts of Gelderland and Central Netherlands; see our previous blogs 'KEI: Digitalization of the justice system', 'The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation' and 'Implementation of KEI legislation for Civil 1.0 procedures'. The pilot was originally supposed to be integrated in several phases, and digital litigation was planned to be integrated in all Dutch courts in 2019. This was cancelled, however, after the development of the digital system had been aborted due to budget overruns and uncertainty about whether it would result in a well-functioning system. The operation of the pilot scheme had led to differences in litigation and procedural rules at the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands on one hand, and the rest of the Dutch courts on the other, since 1 September 2017.

The need to align the procedural rules for all Dutch courts as soon as possible has resulted in this new legislation, which puts an end to the pilot and provides for the same procedural rules for all Dutch courts.

The digital litigation for claims in cassation, in force since 1 March 2017, will remain unchanged.

Reset of digitalisation

The Council of the Judiciary has now adopted a  basic plan for civil law and administrative law to shape digitalisation in a different way (dubbed the "reset" of digitalisation) as a first step towards future legislation on digital litigation. This will require the same uniform procedural law to apply to all courts. Therefore, adjustments are needed to the procedural regulations. These are currently being worked on.

Introducing new procedural rules

The new legislation does not only withdraw the digitalisation pilot, but also introduces new procedural rules that aim to provide the judge with more control during the case and introduce more flexibility and options during an oral hearing. These rules already applied to the two district courts that were involved in the pilot, but as of 1 October 2019 they will apply to all Dutch district courts and courts of appeal. The new rules include the following:

  • The judge can order an oral hearing during any stage of the proceedings. The parties will always have the opportunity to further clarify their arguments during an oral hearing. Therefore the right for a plea (pleidooi) being a separate procedural action comes to an end;
  • During an oral hearing, the judge can discuss the course of the proceedings with the parties, and can order the parties to conduct additional procedural actions. This way judges will have more control, allowing for more customisation during a case.
  • Making a recording of a hearing, whether a visual or sound recording, will become possible.

It is not yet clear when other parts of previous - as yet unimplemented - KEI legislation will be introduced, such as the merger of summons and applications proceedings into one type of proceeding (procesinleiding), and the intended tighter deadlines for procedural steps.

Team

Related news

24.03.2021 NL law
Eerste Kamer neemt wetsvoorstel inroepen bedenktijd door het bestuur van een beursvennootschap aan

Short Reads - Op 23 maart heeft de Eerste Kamer het wetsvoorstel aangenomen dat aan het bestuur van een beursvennootschap1 de mogelijkheid verschaft om, in het geval van aandeelhoudersactivisme of een vijandig openbaar bod, 250 dagen bedenktijd in te roepen. Deze bedenktijd biedt het bestuur tijd en gelegenheid voor een zorgvuldige afweging van de effecten van de genoemde situaties op de onderneming en de belangen van betrokkenen met het oog op een zorgvuldige beleidsbepaling.

Read more