umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
bodrum escort
Short Reads

ACM publishes key priorities for 2018 and 2019

ACM publishes key priorities for 2018 and 2019

ACM publishes key priorities for 2018 and 2019

01.03.2018 EU law

On 13 February 2018, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) highlighted the key priorities it will pursue in 2018 and 2019. It will focus on the digital economy, making the energy market greener, prices of prescription drugs and competition in the port sector. Interested parties were invited to share their comments on the priorities and multiple statements online.

According to the ACM, the digital economy is fundamentally changing Dutch society. Online platforms, search engines, the Internet of Things and blockchain technology create opportunities for both businesses and consumers. However, digitalization also brings risks. To cover those risks, the ACM wants (i) consumers to feel confident when they purchase products or services online, (ii) the internet to be of good quality and open for businesses and consumers and (iii) businesses to comply with rules on consumer protection and competition law when developing innovative products and services. In that regard, the ACM also referred to its recent position paper discussing its strategy in relation to market dominance of big tech companies [see our Newsletter article below].

In relation to the energy market, the ACM will focus on the transition to sustainable energy being efficient, affordable and reliable. For this to happen, well-functioning markets are essential. The ACM also wishes consumers to be well informed when making decisions.

In the pharmaceutical industry, the ACM will focus on drug manufacturers complying with competition law. Competition in this sector , according to the ACM, may contribute to innovation and reduce drug prices. At the same time, the ACM wishes to preserve innovative incentives and stimulate the development of new drugs. The ACM will work on this together with the Dutch Health Care Authority, other competition authorities and stakeholders.

The ACM has stressed the importance of ports in the Dutch economy. Competition in the port sector in the Netherlands has been a priority of the ACM since 2016 as fair competition may improve its international competitiveness. The ACM continues to investigate possible infringements of competition rules and seeks to enhance awareness of those rules by, for example, sending flyers to businesses active in the ports and launching the so-called 'cartel test'. With this test, businesses can preliminarily assess whether there is a risk of their behaviour infringing competition law.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of March 2018. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Court of Justice dismisses all appeals against cartel decision in the freight forwarding sector

  2. ACM publishes position paper on market dominance by tech companies

Team

Related news

01.04.2021 NL law
Slovak Telekom: ECJ on essentials of the ‘essential facilities’ doctrine

Short Reads - Only dominant companies with a “genuinely tight grip” on the market can be forced to grant rivals access to their infrastructure. According to the ECJ’s rulings in Slovak Telekom and Deutsche Telekom, it is only in this scenario that the question of indispensability of the access for rivals comes into play. In the assessment of practices other than access refusal, indispensability may be indicative of a potential abuse of a dominant position, but is not a required condition.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Collective action stopped due to lack of benefit for class members

Short Reads - On 9 December 2020, the Amsterdam District Court (the “Court”) declared a foundation inadmissible in a collective action regarding alleged manipulation of LIBOR, EURIBOR and other interest rate benchmarks. The foundation sought declaratory judgments that Rabobank, UBS, Lloyds Bank and ICAP (the “defendants”) had engaged in wrongful conduct and unjust enrichment vis-à-vis the class members.

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
Pay-for-delay saga ends with nothing new; but pharma quest continues

Short Reads - On 25 March 2021, the ECJ ended the Lundbeck pay-for-delay saga by dismissing the appeals from Lundbeck and five generic manufacturers against a European Commission ‘pay-for-delay’ decision. Following its recent Paroxetine judgment, the ECJ found that Lundbeck’s process patents did not preclude generic companies being viewed as potential competitors, particularly since the patents did not represent an insurmountable barrier to entry. In addition, the patent settlement agreements constituted infringements "by object".

Read more

01.04.2021 NL law
ECJ in Pometon: beware of too much info in staggered hybrid proceedings

Short Reads - In hybrid cartel proceedings (in which one party opts out of settlement), settlement decisions should not pre-judge the outcome of the Commission's investigation into non-settling parties. When the Commission publishes the settlement decision before the decision imposing a fine on the non-settling party, it must be careful in its drafting, the European Court of Justice confirmed. Furthermore, differences in the fining methodology applied to (similarly placed) settling and non-settling parties will have to be objectively justified and sufficiently reasoned.

Read more