Short Reads

Abolishment of tax deductibility of coupon payments on AT-1 capital instruments announced per 1 January 2019

Abolishment of tax deductibility of coupon payments on AT-1 capital i

Abolishment of tax deductibility of coupon payments on AT-1 capital instruments announced per 1 January 2019

03.07.2018 NL law

On Friday 29 June 2018, the Dutch government made public its intention to abolish article 29a Dutch corporate income tax act ('DCITA'), per 1 January 2019. As a result of the abolishment of this provision, coupon payments on so-called additional-tier 1 ('AT-1') capital instruments made by banks and insurance companies will no longer be tax deductible. The amendment of the DCITA, which is aimed to be included in the tax package for 2019, will apply to coupon payments made after 1 January 2019, irrespective whether it concerns new or already existing AT-1 instruments.  

According to 29a DCITA, coupon payments on AT-1 instruments made by banks and insurance companies are currently deductible for DCITA purposes. The Dutch State Secretary of Finance, however, wants to abolish this rule per 1 January 2019 for various reasons. In the view of the State Secretary, the tax deductibility of AT-1 coupon payments provides for an incentive to attract AT-1 capital, instead of real equity (‘core capital’). Furthermore, the State Secretary puts forward that the government is aiming for a more equal treatment of equity and debt for tax purposes, which is achieved by making debt financing less attractive from a tax perspective. In a memorandum of February of this year, dealing with measures to counteract tax avoidance and evasion, this argument was also used by the State Secretary of Finance to substantiate why the earning stripping rules to be introduced per 1 January 2019 will not include a group escape rule (which is included in the ATAD directive). In the February 2018 memorandum, the argument is also used to introduce a generic thincap rule per 2020, which rule is expected to be especially relevant for banks and insurance companies. The announced thincap rule was already seen as a defacto by-passing of article 29a DCITA, because the thicap rules require a minimum equity percentage of 8. 

Another reason why article 29a DCITA will be abolished per 2019, is pressure from the European Commission ('EC'). Already back in 2015 the EC raised the question whether article 29a DCITA could constitute state aid. In another letter, dating from June 2018, the EC is asking The Netherlands to amend their regime to take away the state aid concern of the EC. In this letter, the EC also makes clear to have reviewed the tax treatment of AT-1 capital instruments in other Member States, and where necessary, Member States were asked by the EC to take action where needed from a state aid perspective. 

After the abolishment of article 29a DCITA, the question remains how to qualify (debt or equity), the AT-1 capital instruments when looking at the tax case law of the Dutch Supreme Court. According to the Dutch State Secretary, the AT-1 capital instruments would in that case qualify as equity, but whether this indeed is the case remains to be seen. When looking into this question, also the (possible) effects of the thin cap rule, which likely will be introduced per 2020 (see above), should be taken into consideration. 

Team

Related news

15.07.2020 NL law
Emergency Act on Conditional Final Dividend Withholding Tax Levy submitted to Dutch parliament

Short Reads - On Friday 10 July 2020, a member of the Dutch opposition party Groenlinks has submitted an initiative legislative proposal for a Conditional Final Dividend Withholding Tax Levy Emergency Act (the 'Proposal') to Dutch parliament. The Proposal provides for a conditional final Dutch dividend withholding tax ('DWT') levy due in the event of certain cross-border reorganizations.

Read more

22.06.2020 NL law
Public investment funds in the Netherlands - 2020

Articles - What does the fund registration process involve, e.g., what documents are required to be filed? What are the consequences for failing to register a fund that is required to be registered in Dutch jurisdiction? Or, What are the types of entities that can be public funds in your jurisdiction?

Read more

08.07.2020 NL law
COVID-19 update and Guidelines published on the Dutch implementation of DAC6

Short Reads - The EU Mandatory Disclosure Directive (“DAC6”), introducing a reporting requirement for intermediaries and/or taxpayers of certain cross-border arrangements that are perceived to be aggressive, is effective as of 1 July in the Netherlands. By his letter of 26 June 2020, the Dutch State Secretary of Finance granted deferral of the Dutch reporting deadlines until 1 January 2021.

Read more

07.07.2020 NL law
Mandatory disclosure-verplichtingen voor grensoverschrijdende constructies (‘DAC6’)

Short Reads - Per 1 juli 2020 zijn intermediairs (en in sommige gevallen belastingplichtigen) gehouden om bepaalde potentieel fiscaal agressieve grensoverschrijdende constructies te melden bij de fiscale autoriteiten. Deze verplichting vloeit voort uit de Nederlandse implementatie van de EU-richtlijn inzake ‘mandatory disclosure’ (hierna: “DAC6”). Met DAC6 beoogt de Europese Commissie de internationale fiscale transparantie te bevorderen en ongewenste fiscale praktijken tegen te gaan.

Read more

10.06.2020 NL law
Tax Controversy: Update June 2020

Short Reads - This Tax Alert will address some recent developments in procedural tax law in The Netherlands. We will discuss some interesting developments in tax legislation, more specifically regarding (i) the implementation of DAC6, (ii) procedural tax law aspects of the Withholding Tax Act 2021 and (iii) publication of penalties for tax offences of professionals. Furthermore, we will reflect on (iv) relevant recent tax case law regarding the defensible position concept.

Read more