Short Reads

Dutch Under-Minister of Finance clarifies expected changes to the Dutch CIT fiscal unity regime

Dutch Under-Minister of Finance clarifies expected changes to the D

Dutch Under-Minister of Finance clarifies expected changes to the Dutch CIT fiscal unity regime

24.04.2018

In his letter (the “Letter”) of 20 April 2018 the Dutch Under-Minister of Finance has answered questions raised by a member of the Second Chamber of Parliament regarding the Dutch corporate income tax (“CIT”) fiscal unity regime. 

As already reported in the Stibbe Tax Alert of 22 February 2018, following two recent rulings from the European Court of Justice which – in short - obliged the Netherlands to let taxpayers cherry pick benefits from the fiscal unity regime, the Under-Minister of Finance confirmed that the regime will be amended with retroactive effect to 25 October 2017 at 11.00 hours and that a legislative proposal (the “Urgent Legislative Proposal”) will be published in the second quarter of 2018.

In the Letter the Under-Minister of Finance acknowledged that introducing the amended regime with retroactive effect may indeed have certain undesirable consequences. Therefore, the Under-Minister has now announced a temporary transitional rule (the “Transitional Rule”). According to the Transitional Rule, under certain conditions the Urgent Legislative Proposal will not apply to interest - including costs and currency exchange results – in relation to the anti-base erosion rules of article 10a of the Dutch CIT Act limiting interest deductions on related party debt for the period until and including 31 December 2018. The most important conditions are that both the debt which is legally or de facto - directly or indirectly - due to a related entity or individual and the tainted transaction to which the debt related already existed on 25 October 2017 at 11.00 hours. In addition, the amount of the interest on the total debt may not exceed during a twelve month period an amount of Euro 100,000. If this cap would be exceeded, the full amount of interest would be non-deductible. Furthermore, if the tax inspector could demonstrate that the debt or the tainted transaction is not primarily based on business motives, the Transitional Rule will not apply.

The Urgent Legislative Proposal will in time be replaced with a new group relief arrangement which should be future proof both from a practical and legal perspective. Also in view of an attractive fiscal business climate, the Dutch Under-Minister of Finance will consult with businesses, relevant parties and scholars about such draft arrangement. It seems likely that the draft arrangement will be based on existing group relief arrangements in other countries. The consolidation approach as embedded in the current CIT fiscal unity regime will disappear. However, the most important element of the regime – to wit setting-off profits and losses between the entities included in the fiscal unity - will likely continue to apply.

We will provide an update when further developments regarding the Dutch CIT fiscal unity regime occur.

Stibbe contributes Dutch chapter to Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2018

Lastly we are proud to share with you the Dutch chapter of the Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2018, that was written by Michael Molenaars, Jeroen Smits, Reinout de Boer and Raymond Roumen. Besides providing you with an outline of Dutch corporate income taxation, the chapter pays attention to the impact of BEPS on the Dutch corporate income tax landscape.

Team

Related news

03.02.2020 NL law
CJEU decision on a refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax for foreign investment funds

Short Reads - Dutch dividend withholding tax has been a hot topic the last few years. In 2018 there were discussions on whether the Dutch dividend withholding tax should be abolished or not. One of the arguments to abolish related to the potential risk of the Dutch dividend withholding tax being contrary to EU law. The legislative proposal to abolish Dutch dividend withholding tax was withdrawn, however, the discussions on the potential conflict with EU law remained.

Read more

14.01.2020 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court ruling on Dutch substantial interest rules

Short Reads - On 10 January 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled on an important case whereby a dividend distribution by a Dutch holding company to its Luxembourg corporate shareholder was subject to Dutch corporate income tax based on the Dutch substantial interest rules1. The taxpayer was in this case not successful in relying on either the EU Parent – Subsidiary Directive (the “PSD”) or the argument that such taxation was an infringement of EU law. In this Tax Alert we provide you with a summary of the case and some preliminary observations.

Read more

03.01.2020 NL law
Fiscale maatregelen tegen klimaatverandering

Articles - De wereldwijde toegenomen CO2-uitstoot baart veel mensen zorgen, gezien de hoeveelheid (media)aandacht die de klimaatverandering tegenwoordig krijgt. Men is het erover eens dat er een wereldwijde aanpak zal moeten komen om de klimaatverandering tegen te gaan. Het Klimaatakkoord van Parijs is een eerste stap in de goede richting en als het aan de Europese Commissie ligt, heeft Europa in 2050 een klimaat neutrale economie. Uit de overige bijdragen van deze Klimaatspecial blijkt tevens dat Nederland niet stilzit en verschillende maatregelen treft om de CO2-uitstoot te reduceren.

Read more

29.01.2020 NL law
Staatsfondsen uit de Golfregio gehinderd in een snel veranderende fiscale wereld

Articles - Emile Bongers schreef een artikel waarin hij een aantal fiscale aspecten beschrijft waar staatsfondsen in de praktijk tegenaan lopen bij transacties en investeringen in Nederland. In zijn artikel beperkt hij zich tot staatsfondsen gevestigd in de Golfregio, namelijk Bahrein, Koeweit, Oman, Qatar, Saoedi-Arabië en de Verenigde Arabische Emiraten (de VAE). Dergelijke fondsen investeren jaarlijks, meestal op vertrouwelijke wijze, substantiële bedragen in de Nederlandse economie variërend van infrastructuur- en vastgoedprojecten tot (duurzame) energieprojecten.

Read more

10.12.2019 NL law
David Orobio de Castro, Michael Molenaars and Job van Hooff new board Stibbe in Amsterdam

Inside Stibbe - As of 1 January 2020, David Orobio de Castro, Michael Molenaars and Job van Hooff will form the new board of Stibbe in Amsterdam. David Orobio de Castro has been on the board of Stibbe since 2016 and succeeds Derk Lemstra as managing partner. After a period of six years on the board, Derk will once again fully focus on advising clients in the field of corporate law.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring