Short Reads

Dutch Under-Minister of Finance clarifies expected changes to the Dutch CIT fiscal unity regime

Dutch Under-Minister of Finance clarifies expected changes to the D

Dutch Under-Minister of Finance clarifies expected changes to the Dutch CIT fiscal unity regime

24.04.2018

In his letter (the “Letter”) of 20 April 2018 the Dutch Under-Minister of Finance has answered questions raised by a member of the Second Chamber of Parliament regarding the Dutch corporate income tax (“CIT”) fiscal unity regime. 

As already reported in the Stibbe Tax Alert of 22 February 2018, following two recent rulings from the European Court of Justice which – in short - obliged the Netherlands to let taxpayers cherry pick benefits from the fiscal unity regime, the Under-Minister of Finance confirmed that the regime will be amended with retroactive effect to 25 October 2017 at 11.00 hours and that a legislative proposal (the “Urgent Legislative Proposal”) will be published in the second quarter of 2018.

In the Letter the Under-Minister of Finance acknowledged that introducing the amended regime with retroactive effect may indeed have certain undesirable consequences. Therefore, the Under-Minister has now announced a temporary transitional rule (the “Transitional Rule”). According to the Transitional Rule, under certain conditions the Urgent Legislative Proposal will not apply to interest - including costs and currency exchange results – in relation to the anti-base erosion rules of article 10a of the Dutch CIT Act limiting interest deductions on related party debt for the period until and including 31 December 2018. The most important conditions are that both the debt which is legally or de facto - directly or indirectly - due to a related entity or individual and the tainted transaction to which the debt related already existed on 25 October 2017 at 11.00 hours. In addition, the amount of the interest on the total debt may not exceed during a twelve month period an amount of Euro 100,000. If this cap would be exceeded, the full amount of interest would be non-deductible. Furthermore, if the tax inspector could demonstrate that the debt or the tainted transaction is not primarily based on business motives, the Transitional Rule will not apply.

The Urgent Legislative Proposal will in time be replaced with a new group relief arrangement which should be future proof both from a practical and legal perspective. Also in view of an attractive fiscal business climate, the Dutch Under-Minister of Finance will consult with businesses, relevant parties and scholars about such draft arrangement. It seems likely that the draft arrangement will be based on existing group relief arrangements in other countries. The consolidation approach as embedded in the current CIT fiscal unity regime will disappear. However, the most important element of the regime – to wit setting-off profits and losses between the entities included in the fiscal unity - will likely continue to apply.

We will provide an update when further developments regarding the Dutch CIT fiscal unity regime occur.

Stibbe contributes Dutch chapter to Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2018

Lastly we are proud to share with you the Dutch chapter of the Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2018, that was written by Michael Molenaars, Jeroen Smits, Reinout de Boer and Raymond Roumen. Besides providing you with an outline of Dutch corporate income taxation, the chapter pays attention to the impact of BEPS on the Dutch corporate income tax landscape.

Team

Related news

03.04.2020 LU law
Bill of law on interest and royalties paid to non-cooperative jurisdictions

Short Reads - The Luxembourg Government proposes to introduce the non-deductibility of interest and royalties expenses of a Luxembourg taxpayer towards collective entities located in a blacklisted jurisdiction. This provision would be added through the amendment of article 168 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law (LITL) through a bill of law that was introduced by the Government on 30 March.

Read more

02.04.2020 NL law
Stibbe in Amsterdam answers questions from consumers, small business foundations and NGOs about the coronavirus

Inside Stibbe - In a special Q&A (in Dutch), lawyers from our Amsterdam office share their legal expertise and strive to provide answers to questions put to us by consumers, self-employed persons, enterprises large and small, foundations and NGOs as a result of the corona crisis.

Read more

24.03.2020 LU law
DAC 6 introduced under Luxembourg law

Articles - On 21 March 2020, the Luxembourg Parliament voted to approve the law implementing the Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 (commonly known as DAC 6, the “Directive”) which introduces disclosure obligations for intermediaries and taxpayers of certain reportable cross-border arrangements (the “Law”).

Read more

31.03.2020 NL law
How to meet (Dutch) substance requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Short Reads - Measures taken by multiple jurisdictions in an attempt to stop the spread of the corona virus (COVID-19) affect many people and businesses. Organizing and attending physical board meetings in the Netherlands or elsewhere may be challenging in these times and this may affect a company’s (Dutch) tax position. Below we discuss the potential impact of the measures and provide some preliminary practical guidance.

Read more

This website uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential for the technical functioning of our website and you cannot disable these cookies if you want to read our website. We also use functional cookies to ensure the website functions properly and analytical cookies to personalise content and to analyse our traffic. You can either accept or refuse these functional and analytical cookies.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring