Articles

Standard Contractual Clauses debate referred to the CJEU

Standard Contractual Clauses debate referred to the CJEU

Standard Contractual Clauses debate referred to the CJEU

04.10.2017

On 3 October 2017, the Irish Court referred to the CJUE for a preliminary ruling on the validity of the SCC Decisions.

Max Schrems, after his successful claim seeking the invalidity of the US-EU Safe Harbor decision, complained to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner ("DPC") about the transfer of his personal data from Facebook Ireland to Facebook Inc. in the United States of America.

More precisely, Max Schrems challenged the validity of the agreement between Facebook Ireland and Facebook Inc., which was concluded on the basis of a decision of the European Commission authorizing the transfer of data from EEA-based data exporters to data importers outside the EEA on the basis of standard contractual clauses ("SCC").

The Irish DPC decided to refer this question on the validity of three European Commission Decisions (i.e. Commission Decision 2001/497/EC of 15 June 2001, Commission Decision 2001/915/EC of 27 December 2004, and Commission Decision 2010/87/EU of 5 February 2010 (the "SCC Decisions") to the Irish High Court.

In its decision, the Irish High Court stated: "European Union law guarantees a high level of protection to EU citizens as regards the processing of their personal data within the EU. They are entitled to an equivalent high level of protection when their personal data are transferred outside the EEA." Further, as the court finds that the DPC has raised well-founded concerns regarding the validity of the SCC Decisions, it decided to refer the case to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling.

The full decision can be found here

 

 

Team

Related news

24.05.2019
One year of GDPR - The regulatory warm-up

Short Reads - The first year of the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") is over. Although early noises predicted an entirely new data protection regime, the European legal framework did not change substantially, the major changes being an expansion of the territorial scope to non-EU countries and stronger powers of enforcement. In spite of fears and rumours of immediate enforcement and huge fines, most regulators focused on helping companies achieve compliance, or they enforced without directly imposing fines.

Read more

21.05.2019
Part one - GDPR and Public Law - Applicability of GDPR to public bodies

Articles - Since the GDPR became applicable almost one year ago, multiple questions have arisen about its interaction with other fields of law. In this three-part blog series of “GDPR and Public Law”, we discuss three relevant issues of the interaction of GDPR with public law and government. In this blog we discuss the applicability of GDPR to public bodies.

Read more

27.03.2019
Ook WhatsApp- en sms-berichten op privételefoons vallen onder Wet openbaarheid van bestuur

Short Reads - De Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State heeft in een uitspraak van 20 maart 2019 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:899) bevestigd dat ook WhatsApp- en sms-berichten onder de reikwijdte van de Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (Wob) vallen. Dat geldt niet alleen voor WhatsApp- en sms-berichten die staan op werktelefoons, maar ook voor berichten die staan op privételefoons van bestuurders of ambtenaren. Daarmee gaat de Afdeling terecht verder dan de rechtbank (ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2017:5979) in eerste aanleg, die van oordeel was dat de Wob niet van toepassing is op berichten op privételefoons.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring