Short Reads

Proposals to amend EMIR – what does this mean for corporates?

Proposals to amend EMIR – what does this mean for corporates?

Proposals to amend EMIR – what does this mean for corporates?

04.08.2017 NL law

On 4 May 2017 and 13 June 2017, the European Commission published two proposals to amend the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). After almost five years since EMIR entered into force, these proposals aim to lower the costs of compliance for market participants without compromising the objective of reducing systemic risks in the OTC derivatives market. The May 2017 proposal aims to reduce the regulatory burdens for corporates. The June 2017 proposal introduces a more pan-European approach to supervision of EU CCPs and ensures further supervisory convergence.

The most important proposals of the May 2017 proposal are as follows:

  • Pension funds will again benefit from a three-year exemption from the clearing obligation.
  • Non-Financial Counterparties (NFCs) that breach a clearing threshold must only clear those asset classes for which they have breached the threshold. This is different to the current regime, which provides that NFCs that breach a clearing threshold of a certain asset class will be subject to the clearing obligation for all derivatives.
  • Clearing thresholds will be introduced for Financial Counterparties (FCs); clearing will not be mandatory for every FC.
  • There will be several changes with respect to the reporting obligation:
    • Derivatives concluded on exchanges will be reported only by CCPs on behalf of both counterparties.
    • Transactions between an FC and a small NFC will have to be reported by the FC on behalf of both parties.
    • Intragroup transactions will no longer have to be reported if one of the counterparties is an NFC.
    • The manager of an alternative investment fund (AIF) or, in case of a UCITS, its management company, is responsible for reporting instead of the fund itself.
    • The obligation to report historic data (backloading) is abolished.
  • There will be two new major changes of the definition of an FC:
    • Special purpose entities, for instance those used in securitization structures, will fall under this definition; and
    • AIFs and UCITS, even if they are not authorized in accordance with the applicable Directives, will fall under this definition. This is different to the current wording of EMIR, which only refers to such entities to the extent they are authorized.

Most changes are indeed expected to result in a reduction of the regulatory burdens for corporates. However, the broader scope of the definition of FCs will mean that more parties will qualify as an FC. The European Commission did not explain why these parties must qualify as such. This will not only lead to additional burdens for investment funds, but will also affect the securitization market. In addition, based on the current proposed wording, EMIR will have a more extra-territorial effect since all special purpose entities, AIFs and UCITS that qualify as such will fall within the scope of this definition, regardless of where they are situated. It is of course possible that the final text of the amendment of EMIR will include a more nuanced definition of an FC in this respect. 

Team

Related news

16.07.2018 NL law
ISDA publishes consultation on benchmark fallbacks

Short Reads - ISDA publishes consultation on benchmark fallbacks. As part of an initiative to amend its standard derivatives documentation to facilitate the replacement of existing interbank offered rates (IBORs) by risk free rates (RFRs), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has published a consultation paper on certain adjustments required to such RFRs.

Read more

10.07.2018 EU law
Hof van Justitie EU oordeelt over reikwijdte 'beroepsgeheim' financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens

Articles - In een arrest van 19 juni 2018 oordeelt de Grote kamer van het Hof van Justitie EU over de reikwijdte van het 'beroepsgeheim' van financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens. Het hof oordeelt dat de informatie die zich in het toezichtsdossier bevindt niet onvoorwaardelijk vertrouwelijk van aard is en bijgevolg onder het beroepsgeheim van de toezichthouder valt. Gegevens die mogelijk commerciële geheimen zijn geweest, worden in beginsel geacht niet meer actueel en dus niet langer geheim te zijn, wanneer die gegevens ten minste vijf jaar oud zijn.

Read more

11.07.2018 NL law
Update initiatiefwetsvoorstel introductie instemmingsrecht en aanscherping vaste beloning bankiers

Short Reads - Op 25 april 2018 heeft de Afdeling advisering van de Raad van State (hierna Raad van State) een kritisch advies uitgebracht over het initiatief-wetsvoorstel om de wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft) te wijzigen. Op 5 juli 2018 is dit advies tezamen met de reactie van de initiatiefnemers van het wetsvoorstel op het advies van de Raad van State gepubliceerd, evenals het aangepaste wetsvoorstel dat is aangeboden aan de Tweede Kamer.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring