Articles

Stock options and management companies: new circular letter published

Stock options and management companies: new circular letter published

Stock options and management companies: new circular letter published

13.04.2017 BE law

Today, the Belgian tax administration has published a new circular letter (Circular letter 2017/C/21 dd. 13 April 2017) in relation to the tax treatment of stock options that are granted directly to managers (physical persons) who operate through a management company.

This circular letter (Dutch; French) follows from the controversy that arose at the end of last year in this respect, and confirms that such grants cannot benefit from the beneficial reduced tax valuation rules for the purposes of the Belgian stock option law. Interestingly, this position only applies to options that were offered after the date of publication of the circular letter (13 April 2017). This seems to imply that direct grants that were made before (or even on) this date may still benefit from the former practice of the tax administration whereby the more beneficial valuation for tax purposes was accepted under certain circumstances.  

The Belgian stock option law of 26 March 1999 provides that, subject to certain conditions, the grant of stock options to physical persons can benefit from a special tax regime. This regime basically implies

  1. that the benefit in kind resulting from the grant of the options is taxable at grant, and that any gains resulting from the exercise of the options and/or from the sale of the underlying shares remain, as a matter of principle, free of tax; and
  2. that the benefit in kind resulting from the grant of the options is determined on a lump sum basis. The taxable amount is equal to 18% or, subject to conditions, 9% of the fair market value of the underlying shares. If the option is exercisable during a period of more than five years, the taxable amount increases by 1% (or, subject to conditions, 0.5%) for each year or part of a year that exceeds that five year period.

The above-mentioned special tax regime only applies to options that are granted to physical persons. Options that are granted to (management) companies are out of scope of the stock option law and are generally subject to a far less favorable tax treatment.

In situations where members of management operate through a management company, many companies have – for the reasons set out above – chosen to directly grant stock options to the underlying managers (physical persons) of that management company rather than to the management company itself.

The main downside of such way of working was that, as a matter of principle, such ‘direct grants’ could not benefit from the beneficial 9% valuation of the underlying shares (i.e. since the relevant options do not relate to shares of the company to the benefit of which the relevant physical persons exercised their professional activities, which is one of the conditions for the reduced tax valuation rules to apply).

In practice, the tax administration however accepted that in certain circumstances, such type of grant could benefit from the reduced valuation rules (e.g. where the management company was a board member of the company to the shares of which the options related, and provided that the underlying manager-physical person qualified as the “permanent representative” of his management company for these purposes).

The circular letter of 13 April 2017 now puts a halt to this (informal) practice and clearly states that stock options that are granted directly to the underlying manager (physical person) of a management company can no longer benefit from the reduced valuation rules. This does however not take away from the fact that as a matter of principle, direct grants under the Belgian stock option law remain possible and permitted. The only consequence of the circular should be that the taxable benefit resulting from such direct grants will now in all cases be equal to 18% of the fair market value of the underlying shares rather than 9%.

The circular applies to stock options that are offered after the date of its publication (i.e. 13 April 2017). This seems to indicate that options that were offered directly to the managers (physical persons) of management companies on or before that date may still benefit from the reduced valuation rules (provided of course that the relevant conditions were met – see above).

Team

Related news

24.07.2019 NL law
Implementatie van de Herziene Aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn

Short Reads - Op 10 juni 2019 diende de Herziene Aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn (2017/828/EU) in de Nederlandse wet- en regelgeving geïmplementeerd te zijn. Nederland heeft deze termijn niet gehaald. Na het zomerreces zal de behandeling van het implementatiewetsvoorstel bij de Eerste Kamer worden voortgezet. In deze Update geven wij een overzicht van actuele ontwikkelingen. Wij verwijzen in dit verband ook naar onze Webtool over dit onderwerp.

Read more

30.07.2019 NL law
Consultatie concept Wetsvoorstel nadere beloningsmaatregelen financiële sector

Articles - Op 5 juli 2019 heeft de minister van Financiën middels een brief aan de Tweede Kamer een consultatie geopend over het concept Wetsvoorstel nadere beloningsmaatregelen financiële sector. Tevens heeft de minister de Tweede Kamer geïnformeerd over zijn besluit om af te zien van de introductie van een wettelijke verplichting tot terugvordering van een deel van de vaste beloning van bestuurders van systeemrelevante banken bij staatsteun (claw back). Deze claw back had de minister bij een eerdere maatschappelijke consultatie voorgesteld. 

Read more

23.07.2019 NL law
Beroep directeur op wachtgeldregeling onaanvaardbaar (annotatie)

Articles - De uitspraak van het Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden op 2 april 2019 illustreert duidelijk wat de gevolgen kunnen zijn indien een werknemer een mogelijke aanspraak op een wachtgeldregeling verzwijgt tijdens de onderhandelingen over een vergoeding. Volgens het hof zal in dat geval een beroep op wachtgeld naast een afgesproken vergoeding onaanvaardbaar zijn in de zin van artikel 6:248 lid 2 BW.

Read more

28.07.2019 NL law
Public M&A in the Netherlands – 2019

Articles - How may publicly listed business combine? What are the main laws and regulations governing business combinations and acquisitions of publicly listed companies? What are the disclosure requirements for owners of large shareholders in a public company? How are cross-border transactions structured? Do specific laws and regulations apply to cross border transactions? Allard Metzelaar and Willem Beek provide answers to these and other questions about public M&A in the Netherlands.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring