Short Reads

ISDA and other market associations request regulatory forbearance in respect of 'big bang' variation margin compliance date

ISDA and other market associations request regulatory forbearance in respect of 'big bang' variation margin compliance date

ISDA and other market associations request regulatory forbearance in respect of 'big bang' variation margin compliance date

06.04.2017 NL law

Legislators from the EU, the US and several other jurisdictions have adopted regulations for mandatory risk management procedures to be applied by counterparties to non-centrally cleared OTC derivative contracts. In an open letter to the regulators of those jurisdictions dated 7 February, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) and a number of other market associations have requested 'regulatory forbearance' in respect of the 1 March 2017 compliance date for the exchange of variation margin under those regulations.

On 4 January 2017 the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 of 4 October 2016 (the Regulation) entered into force, providing regulatory standards for the timely, accurate and appropriately segregated exchange of initial margin and variation margin collateral which counterparties to non-centrally cleared OTC derivative contracts are required to collect or post under the Regulation. Similar regulations have entered into force in other jurisdictions, including the US, Canada and Japan.

Under the Regulation, the requirements for calculation of variation margin and exchange of variation margin collateral apply from 4 January 2017 to all counterparty pairs which include at least one counterparty that has, or belongs to a group that has, an aggregate average notional amount of non-centrally cleared derivatives above EUR 3,000 billion. Since 1 March 2017, these requirements apply to other counterparty pairs as well. In many other jurisdictions, 1 March 2017 is also the date on which the variation margin requirements enter into force for the vast majority of counterparty pairs.

ISDA, in cooperation with a number of other associations representing market participants, has conducted a survey among market participants about variation margin readiness. According to ISDA, the data from the survey shows that the documentation and operational challenges that are necessary to comply with the variation margin requirements by 1 March 2017 are high, despite concerted and continuing efforts by market participants. Among other things, headway made with the execution of variation margin credit support annexes as required to comply with the regulations is currently limited.

In their letter, ISDA and the other associations warn that even if substantial progress is made in the next few weeks, a significant number of trading relationships will be interrupted and that a cessation in derivatives trading by and between significant portions of market participants would result in market fragmentation, market disruption, higher prices and the potential for a lack of access to hedging. Therefore, they have requested that the relevant authorities (including the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets) of all jurisdictions with a 1 March 2017 effective date for their variation margin regulations provide a 6 months transitional period during which market participants can continue to execute new derivatives transactions while they complete the necessary steps towards regulatory compliance for the relevant transactions.

On 23 February 2017 the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published a paper which indicates that neither the ESAs nor the competent authorities (CAs) have the formal power to disapply directly applicable EU legislation, but that they expect the CAs in their day-to-day enforcement of applicable legislation to make a case-by-case assessment on the degree of compliance and progress particularly with regard to smaller counterparties. Regulators of other jurisdictions have published similar statements. 

On 30 March 2017 the Dutch Central Bank published a newsletter which indicates that the Dutch Central Bank will not directly enforce the 1 March compliance date against market participants subject to its supervision. 

A copy of the letter from ISDA can be downloaded here:

http://www2.isda.org/attachment/OTE2OQ==/Letter-to-Regulators-Re-VMBigBang_7Feb2017_Final.pdf

A copy of the ESAs paper can be downloaded here:

https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esas_communication_on_industry_request_on_forbearance_variation_margin_implementation.docx_0.pdf

The news letter from the Dutch Central Bank is published here:

https://www.dnb.nl/nieuws/dnb-nieuwsbrieven/nieuwsbrief-banken/nieuwsbrief-banken-maart-2017/dnb355715.jsp

Team

Related news

30.03.2022 LU law
(R)evolution of the securitisation framework

Articles - On 4 March 2022, the law of 25 February 2022 amending the law of 22 March 2004 on securitisation (the 2004 Law) has been published. It entered into force on 8 March 2022. This is a welcomed (r)evolution in the securitisation operations in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg after 18 years of implementation of a tested and widely admitted legal framework.

Read more

25.02.2022
Stibbe Debt Finance Seminar/Webinar: issues you need to know about in 2022

Seminar - On Wednesday March 9 (16:00-17:30) Stibbe presents a seminar to update and outlook you on legal challenges facing financial market participants in 2022. In addition, on Wednesday March 16, 2022, (12:00-13:30), a webinar will also be held on the same theme. The in-person seminar will be held in Dutch and the online session in English.

Read more

11.03.2022 LU law
The New Luxembourg SFDR and Taxonomy Regulation Implementing Law

Articles - On 3 March 2022, the Luxembourg law of 25 February 2022 implementing a.o. the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the Taxonomy Regulation has been published in the Official Journal of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. This law specifies the CSSF and CAA's supervisory and investigation powers concerning financial market participants and financial advisers under their supervision in relation to the control of the implementation of the SFDR and the Taxonomy Regulation, as well as, their administrative sanctioning powers in case of non-compliance by in-scope firms.

Read more