Short Reads

Act implementing the Directive and Regulation statutory audits of annual accounts

Act implementing the Directive and Regulation statutory audits of annu

Act implementing the Directive and Regulation statutory audits of annual accounts

10.04.2017 NL law

The EU Audit Regulation (EU) nr. 537/2014 and the EU Audit Directive (2014/56/EU) came into effect on 17 June 2016. The Act implementing the Amending Directive and Regulation on statutory audits of annual accounts ("Implementation Act") and the ancillary Decree implementing the Directive and Regulation ("Implementation Decree") entered into force (for the most part) on 1 January 2017.

The Implementation Act comprises amendments to the Audit Firms Supervision Act (Wet toezicht accountantskantoren, "Wta"), the Accountancy Profession Act (Wet op het accountantsberoep), Disciplinary Proceedings Auditors Act (Wet tuchtrechtspraak accountants), article 2:393(5) of the Dutch Civil Code and the Financial Supervision Funding Act (Wet bekostiging financieel toezicht). The Implementation Decree includes changes to the Audit Firms Supervision Decree (Besluit toezicht accountantsorganisaties) and the Audit Committee Decree (Besluit Audit Commissie). The new rules and regulations for audit committees are discussed below.

The Audit Directive and Audit Regulation tighten up the requirements with regard to the structure and duties of the audit committee, which should reinforce the independence and technical competence of the audit committee. Audit committees are not supervised by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten - "AFM") directly, but their performance will be monitored by the AFM under the Regulation.

In the Netherlands, the new rules applicable to audit committees are included in the Decree Establishing Audit Committees. Under this Decree, public interest entities ("PIEs"), such as listed companies, non-listed banks and (certain) insurance companies, are required to have an audit committee. The Decree imposes, in line with the Directive, new requirements with respect to the composition of the audit committee. The committee members as a whole must have competence relevant to the sector in which the legal entity is operating. Instead of one member of the audit committee, the majority of the members, including the chairman, must be independent of the legal entity. It follows from the explanatory memorandum to the Implementation Decree that the independence requirements for the supervisory board in the Dutch Corporate Governance Code ("Code") can be followed in order to determine who is independent. In the explanatory notes the legislator refers to the 2008 Code, which is the designated code of conduct by Decree of 10 December 2009 (best practice provision III.2.2). At least one member of the audit committee must have competence in accounting and/or auditing. The chairman of the audit committee will be appointed by the supervisory board, or by the members of the management board that are not executive members, or the members of the audit committee.

As regards the allocation of duties of the audit committee, reference is no longer made to the provisions of the Code because the duties are now set out in the Decree Establishing Audit Committees as follows:

  • inform the management board or supervisory board of the outcome of the statutory audit and explain how the statutory audit contributed to the integrity of financial reporting and what the role of the audit committee was in that process;
  • submit recommendations or proposals to ensure the integrity of the financial reporting process; and
  • be responsible for the selection procedure of statutory auditor(s). The manner in which the audit committee must implement this procedure is set out in the Regulation.

The audit committee's existing duty to monitor the effectiveness of the internal systems is in line with the Directive limited to monitoring the effectiveness of such systems regarding the financial reporting. Under the Decree Establishing Audit Committees, the audit committee when performing its existing duty to monitor the audit of the (consolidated) annual accounts must also take into account the findings of the AFM in accordance with article 26(6) of the Regulation. Under this article of the Regulation the AFM assesses the design of the internal quality control system of the audit firms (article 48a of the Wta).

There is still an option for PIEs to have a body that performs equivalent functions to an audit committee (article 39(4) of the Audit Directive). The requirements on the composition of the audit committee apply mutatis mutandis to this body. The directors’ report must disclose which body carries out those functions and how that body is composed.

Team

Related news

17.01.2020 LU law
Stibbe Luxembourg étend son offre de services par la venue de nouveaux associés et counsels au sein des pratiques spécialisées en gestion d’actifs/fonds d’investissement, en droit des sociétés ainsi qu’en droit financier

Inside Stibbe - Luxembourg, le 17 janvier 2020 – Stibbe renforce ses pratiques spécialisées en droit des sociétés, en droit financier ainsi qu’en gestion d’actifs/fonds d’investissement par la venue de Bernard Beerens (associé, droit des sociétés), Audrey Jarreton (counsel, droit bancaire et financier), Edouard d’Anterroches (associé, fonds d’investissement), Victorien Hémery (associé, fonds d’investissement) et Dayana Bert (counsel, fonds d’investissement).

Read more

20.01.2020 BE law
Unregulated real estate investment vehicles in Belgium

Articles - This article provides an overview of the main characteristics of the most commonly used unregulated real estate vehicles in Belgium (the regulated real estate vehicles are part of a separate publication). It does not intend to provide a complete overview of all unregulated investment vehicles available, but it does give insight into the main characteristics of the most commonly used investment vehicles in Belgium.

Read more

17.01.2020 LU law
Stibbe boosts service offering in Luxembourg with new partners and counsel for asset management/funds and corporate & finance

Inside Stibbe - Luxembourg, 17 January 2020 – Stibbe reinforces its corporate & finance and asset management/funds practices in Luxembourg with the hire of Bernard Beerens (corporate partner), Audrey Jarreton (banking and finance counsel), Edouard d’Anterroches (investment funds partner), Victorien Hémery (investment funds partner), and Dayana Bert (investment funds counsel). Their arrival comes after the recent hire of tax partner Johan Léonard. All of these new additions demonstrate the firm’s commitment to expanding Stibbe’s service offering in Luxembourg.

Read more

15.01.2020 NL law
The Dutch scheme - a summary of the upcoming new restructuring tool

Short Reads - As mentioned in our earlier blog, the Dutch legislator has prepared a bill – the Act on confirmation of private restructuring plans (Wet homologatie onderhands akkoord) – introducing a framework that allows debtors to restructure their debts outside formal insolvency proceedings (the “Dutch Scheme“). We expect this highly-anticipated bill to enter into force by this summer. The Dutch Scheme combines features from the UK Scheme of Arrangement and the US Chapter 11 proceedings. Below, we summarize certain key aspects of the Dutch Scheme.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring