Seminar

1 November 2016: seminar about the Executives' Pay (Standards) Act (Wet Normering Topinkomens - WNT)

1 November 2016: seminar about the Executives' Pay (Standards) Act (Wet Normering Topinkomens - WNT)

1 November 2016: seminar about the Executives' Pay (Standards) Act (Wet Normering Topinkomens - WNT)

19.10.2016

The Executives' Pay (Standards) Act (Wet Normering Topinkomens ("WNT") came into force over three years ago. There have been many developments since this time in respect of enforcement practice, court judgments regarding the WNT and in the labor market generally. New developments, like WNT III and the Evaluation Act WNT, raise many more questions and topics for discussion.

The seminar will take place on 1 November 2016 at Stibbe’s new office in Amsterdam from 12.15 until 5 p.m. to address the impact of the WNT and the various amendments. The goal of this seminar is to evaluate the impact of WNT I and WNT II during the first three years, discuss how it works in practice and consider future implications. The seminar will consist of short lectures given by expert speakers from inside and outside Stibbe. During this seminar there will be time for questions and discussion.

Please find the details of the program below. There will be no fee for the seminar, but we advise you to reserve a place as the number of participants is limited. If you would like to attend kindly apply before Tuesday 25 October via StibbeEvents@stibbe.com.

Program

  • 12.15 - 13.00 Welcome and lunch
  • 13.00 - 13.20 Opening (Tom Barkhuysen, lawyer/partner Administrative Law Stibbe and Professor Constitutional and Administrative Law Leiden University)
  • 13.20 - 13.50 Senior civil servant and dismissal (Damiën Berkhout, laywer Litigation Stibbe)
  • 13.50 - 14.20 Transitory law (Machteld Claessens, lawyer Administrative Law Stibbe)
  • 14.20 - 14.50 Break
  • 14.50 - 15.20 WNT from perspective of the Accountant (Victor Kradolfer, BDO)
  • 15.20 - 15.50 Monitoring and enforcement (Barend Barentsen, professor Social Law and Labor Relations in the Public Sector)
  • 15.50 - 16.20 Effects on the labor market (Tom Hilgers, Korn Ferry HayGroup)
  • 16.20 - 16.40 Discussion and debate 
  • 16.40 - 16.50 Wrap up (Tom Barkhuysen, lawyer/partner Administrative Law Stibbe and Professor Constitutional and Administrative Law Leiden University)
  • 16.50 - 18.00 Drinks

 

Team

Related news

24.01.2020
Can the government refrain from imposing enforcement measures if it is not within the offender’s power to comply with a standard?

Short Reads - What should be done if a stakeholder makes a request to the government for enforcement to rectify violations in a scenario where the offender does not have full power to comply because of a reliance on third parties? The Administrative Division of the Dutch Council of State ruled on 23 January 2019 that an administrative body cannot simply reject an enforcement request in such a situation, but must consider whether, for example, the imposition of an order subject to a penalty payment may provide an incentive for the actual termination of the violation.

Read more

16.01.2020
De Amsterdamse milieuzone voor brom- en snorfietsen: voertuigen van een bepaald jaar weren is mogelijk bij ontbreken van een redelijk alternatief

Short Reads - ABRvS 20 november 2019, ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:3865 Deze blog is het vierde deel in een reeks Stibbeblogs over gemeentelijke milieuzones. In 2017 oordeelde de Afdeling over de milieuzone voor personen- en bestelauto’s met dieselmotoren in Utrecht. In 2018 presenteerde de staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat haar beleid voor harmonisatie van uiteenlopende gemeentelijke milieuzones. Een jaar geleden maakten wij in een FAQ de balans op over de harmonisatie van milieuzones.

Read more

20.01.2020
Planologische medewerking mag worden geweigerd als initiatiefnemer zich in strijd met gemeentelijk beleid onvoldoende heeft ingespannen voor draagvlak

Short Reads - De Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State heeft op 18 december 2019 (ECLI:NL:RVS:2019:4209) overwogen dat een bestuursorgaan geen planologische medewerking hoeft te verlenen aan de wijziging van een bestemmingsplan als de aanvrager zich niet heeft ingespannen om maatschappelijk draagvlak te creëren.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring