Articles

Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud

Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud

Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud

04.05.2016 NL law

 

On 5 April 2016 the Senate approved two of the three legislative proposals aiming to combat bankruptcy fraud by :

  1. introducing director disqualification under civil law (‘Wet civielrechtelijk bestuursverbod’, Kamerstukken II 2013/14, 34 011 )
  2. revising the criminalization of bankruptcy fraud (‘Wet herziening strafbaarstelling faillissementsfraude’, Kamerstukken II 2013/14, 33 994

These proposals are part of the legislative programme entitled ‘Reassessment of bankruptcy law’ (‘Herijking faillissementsrecht’) and are expected to enter  into force on 1 July 2016.

With the introduction of the bill on director disqualification under civil law, it becomes possible to disqualify directors for up to five years for committing bankruptcy fraud or misconduct before the commencement of the bankruptcy. Disqualified directors are not allowed to act in their capacity as a director during the disqualification period and are also not allowed to join another organization as a director or supervisory director. With this measure the government aims to combat bankruptcy fraud and irregularities surrounding bankruptcy and prevent fraudulent directors from continuing their activities. A director disqualification is imposed by the civil court at the request of either the Public Ministry or the trustee under the bankruptcy of a legal entity of which the person in question was the director.

The second bill on the revision of the criminalization of bankruptcy fraud seeks to introduce more criminal law options to tackle bankruptcy fraud. To further increase the effectiveness of the fight against bankruptcy, existing criminal bankruptcy provisions will be modernized and legal instruments expanded so that, for example, breaching the obligation to keep records or authorizing excessive spending prior to bankruptcy resulting in a disadvantage for creditors will become criminal offences.

The third bill intended to combat bankruptcy fraud  is currently pending in the House and aims to strengthen the position of the trustee in bankruptcy (‘Wet versterking positie curator’, Kamerstukken II 2014/15, 34 253) by a variety of measures including  the expansion of information and cooperation obligations. As a result of this bill, a trustee in bankruptcy will have more options  to detect and tackle irregularities surrounding bankruptcy.

The ‘Reassessment of bankruptcy law’ programme includes a total of seven legislative proposals, which are intended to strengthen the reorganizing ability of companies and modernize bankruptcy law and combat bankruptcy fraud at the same time.

The post “Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud” is a post of www.stibbeblog.nl

Related news

11.04.2019 NL law
Double roles in attributing knowledge

Short Reads - The knowledge of a person who in fact runs a company can be attributed to the company if the sole director and shareholder is a 'straw man', the Supreme Court confirmed in a judgment of 29 March 2019. The rules by the Supreme Court are not revolutionary or even new. But circumstances essential for the attribution of knowledge are ignored. The double role played by the 'man in charge' raises questions about how to apply the rules as identified by the Supreme Court to the facts

Read more

28.03.2019 NL law
European Parliament votes in favour of representative actions for consumers

Short Reads - On 26 March 2019 the European Parliament approved an amended version of the European Commission's proposal for a Directive on representative actions for the protection of collective interests of consumers, following a debate on 25 March 2019. The Directive will become law once the Council and the European Parliament reach an agreement on the European Commission's proposal. The Council has not yet been able to adopt a position on the Directive, meaning that the Directive will most likely be considered again after the ­­­European elections in May 2019 by a different European Parliament

Read more

10.04.2019 NL law
Damage due to a defective driveway and the Dutch twenty year limitation period: When does limitation start in case of a continuous event that causes damage?

Short Reads - On 22 March 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:412) that the strict liability for buildings (opstalaansprakelijkheid) is not linked to a specific damaging act but to a damaging condition, as referred to in section 6:174 DCC. Therefore, there is no reason to regard a damaging act as an 'event that caused damage' as referred to in section 3:310 DCC concerning the limitation period for claims for damages.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
European Court of Justice: actio pauliana is covered by jurisdiction rule of forum of contract. A judgment with foreseeable consequences?

Short Reads - Imagine that a debtor voluntarily concludes a transaction with a third party where he knows (or should know) that it hinders the creditor's possibilities of collecting the debt. In civil law countries, a creditor can invoke the nullification of that legal act by means of a so-called actio pauliana. This raises the question of which court has jurisdiction in the case of an international dispute, regarding an actio pauliana, that is instituted by a creditor against a third party?

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring