Articles

Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud

Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud

Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud

04.05.2016 NL law

 

On 5 April 2016 the Senate approved two of the three legislative proposals aiming to combat bankruptcy fraud by :

  1. introducing director disqualification under civil law (‘Wet civielrechtelijk bestuursverbod’, Kamerstukken II 2013/14, 34 011 )
  2. revising the criminalization of bankruptcy fraud (‘Wet herziening strafbaarstelling faillissementsfraude’, Kamerstukken II 2013/14, 33 994

These proposals are part of the legislative programme entitled ‘Reassessment of bankruptcy law’ (‘Herijking faillissementsrecht’) and are expected to enter  into force on 1 July 2016.

With the introduction of the bill on director disqualification under civil law, it becomes possible to disqualify directors for up to five years for committing bankruptcy fraud or misconduct before the commencement of the bankruptcy. Disqualified directors are not allowed to act in their capacity as a director during the disqualification period and are also not allowed to join another organization as a director or supervisory director. With this measure the government aims to combat bankruptcy fraud and irregularities surrounding bankruptcy and prevent fraudulent directors from continuing their activities. A director disqualification is imposed by the civil court at the request of either the Public Ministry or the trustee under the bankruptcy of a legal entity of which the person in question was the director.

The second bill on the revision of the criminalization of bankruptcy fraud seeks to introduce more criminal law options to tackle bankruptcy fraud. To further increase the effectiveness of the fight against bankruptcy, existing criminal bankruptcy provisions will be modernized and legal instruments expanded so that, for example, breaching the obligation to keep records or authorizing excessive spending prior to bankruptcy resulting in a disadvantage for creditors will become criminal offences.

The third bill intended to combat bankruptcy fraud  is currently pending in the House and aims to strengthen the position of the trustee in bankruptcy (‘Wet versterking positie curator’, Kamerstukken II 2014/15, 34 253) by a variety of measures including  the expansion of information and cooperation obligations. As a result of this bill, a trustee in bankruptcy will have more options  to detect and tackle irregularities surrounding bankruptcy.

The ‘Reassessment of bankruptcy law’ programme includes a total of seven legislative proposals, which are intended to strengthen the reorganizing ability of companies and modernize bankruptcy law and combat bankruptcy fraud at the same time.

The post “Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud” is a post of www.stibbeblog.nl

Related news

19.10.2018 EU law
EU top court on international jurisdiction in tort cases: localising pure financial loss, continued

Short Reads - On 12 September 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirmed that in prospectus liability cases, a court can only assume international jurisdiction on the basis that the alleged damage consists of purely financial loss which occurred directly in an investor's bank account held with a bank established within its jurisdiction if additional specific circumstances also contribute to that court assuming jurisdiction.

Read more

26.09.2018 BE law
Eerlijke marktpraktijken, slechtmaking en de vrijheid van meningsuiting

Articles - Op 1 maart 2018, oordeelde het hof van beroep te Brussel[1] dat een aan derden verzonden e-mailbericht waarin werd meegedeeld dat alle samenwerking met de betrokken partij was beëindigd op grond van het feit dat de door deze laatste geleverde diensten waren bekritiseerd wegens hun slechte kwaliteit, en dit terwijl er hieromtrent een procedure hangende is, een daad van slechtmaking is, verboden door artikel VI.104 WER. Hetzelfde geldt voor een e-mailbericht aan derden, waarin een bepaalde persoon wordt afgedaan als een “individu zonder scrupules”.

Read more

26.09.2018 BE law
Pratiques honnêtes du marché, dénigrement et la liberté d’expression

Articles - Par jugement du 1er mars 2018, la cour d’appel de Bruxelles[1] a déclaré qu’un courriel adressé à des tiers, indiquant qu’il aurait été mis fin à toute collaboration avec la partie en cause au motif que les prestations fournies par celle-ci auraient été critiquées en raison de leur piètre qualité alors qu’une procédure est pendante à cet égard, constitue un acte de dénigrement interdit au sens de l’article VI.104. du CDE. Il en est de même d’un courriel adressé à des tiers, indiquant qu’une personne identifiée est un «  individu sans scrupules ».

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring