Short Reads

OO&R symposium: presentation on the role of the trustee in bankruptcy in combating bankruptcy fraud

OO&R symposium: presentation on the role of the trustee in bankruptcy in combating bankruptcy fraud

OO&R symposium: presentation on the role of the trustee in bankruptcy in combating bankruptcy fraud

27.05.2016 NL law

During the OO&R symposium on 17 May 2016, Toni van Hees gave a presentation on the role of the trustee in bankruptcy in combating bankruptcy fraud. The reason for this presentation stems from the ongoing legislative programme ‘Reassessment of bankruptcy law’ (Herijking faillissementsrecht) in which combating bankruptcy fraud plays an important part.

 

Two out three bills submitted in this context have already been adopted by the Senate and are expected to enter into force on 1 July 2016. For more information see the previously published blog “Senate agrees with bills on bankruptcy fraud”.

Toni van Hees questions whether the trustee in bankruptcy will use the additional scope to act against bankruptcy fraud in practice. At present, the trustee sees himself as the protector of the interests of the creditors and not as a fraud fighter. Toni believes this is unlikely to change as a result of the new legislation. He argues that it is necessary – alongside the primary task of the trustee protecting the interests of creditors-  to specifically add the task of combating bankruptcy fraud to the Bankruptcy Act. It also seems logical to take into account other public interests such as the impact of bankruptcy on employees and other wider social and environmental implications. These interests have often taken second place in bankruptcy settlements.

The post “OO&R symposium: presentation on the role of the trustee in bankruptcy in combating bankruptcy fraud” is a post of www.stibbeblog.nl

 

Related news

24.05.2019 NL law
European regulatory initiatives for online platforms and search engines

Short Reads - As part of the digital economy, the rise of online platforms and search engines raises all kinds of legal questions. For example, do bicycle couriers qualify as employees who are entitled to ordinary labour law protections? Or should they be considered self-employed (see our Stibbe website on this issue)? The rise of online platforms also triggers more general legal questions on the relationship between online platforms and their users. Importantly, the European Union is becoming increasingly active in this field.

Read more

11.04.2019 NL law
Double roles in attributing knowledge

Short Reads - The knowledge of a person who in fact runs a company can be attributed to the company if the sole director and shareholder is a 'straw man', the Supreme Court confirmed in a judgment of 29 March 2019. The rules by the Supreme Court are not revolutionary or even new. But circumstances essential for the attribution of knowledge are ignored. The double role played by the 'man in charge' raises questions about how to apply the rules as identified by the Supreme Court to the facts

Read more

01.05.2019 NL law
Arbitral award obligating Ecuador to prevent enforcement of USD 8.6 billion order does not violate public order

Short Reads - Due to environmental damage as a result of oil extraction in the Ecuadorian Amazon, oil company Chevron was ordered to pay USD 8.6 billion to Ecuadorian citizens. In order to claim release of liability, Chevron and Texaco initiated arbitration proceedings against Ecuador. Arbitral awards ordered Ecuador to prevent enforcement of the Ecuadorian judgment, leaving the Ecuadorian plaintiffs temporarily unable to enforce their judgment. According to the Supreme Court (12 April 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:565), these arbitral awards did however not violate public order.

Read more

10.04.2019 NL law
Damage due to a defective driveway and the Dutch twenty year limitation period: When does limitation start in case of a continuous event that causes damage?

Short Reads - On 22 March 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:412) that the strict liability for buildings (opstalaansprakelijkheid) is not linked to a specific damaging act but to a damaging condition, as referred to in section 6:174 DCC. Therefore, there is no reason to regard a damaging act as an 'event that caused damage' as referred to in section 3:310 DCC concerning the limitation period for claims for damages.

Read more

01.05.2019 NL law
Termination of an agreement: compelling grounds?

Short Reads - When does a reason given for termination of an agreement qualify as a compelling ground? That was the central question in the Dutch Supreme Court's decision of 29 March 2019 (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:446). Depending on the nature of the agreement and the circumstances of the case, termination may only take place under certain conditions, e.g. only on compelling grounds. 

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
European Court of Justice: actio pauliana is covered by jurisdiction rule of forum of contract. A judgment with foreseeable consequences?

Short Reads - Imagine that a debtor voluntarily concludes a transaction with a third party where he knows (or should know) that it hinders the creditor's possibilities of collecting the debt. In civil law countries, a creditor can invoke the nullification of that legal act by means of a so-called actio pauliana. This raises the question of which court has jurisdiction in the case of an international dispute, regarding an actio pauliana, that is instituted by a creditor against a third party?

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring