umraniye escort pendik escort
maderba.com
implant
olabahis
canli poker siteleri meritslot oleybet giris adresi betgaranti
escort antalya
istanbul escort
sirinevler escort
antalya eskort bayan
brazzers
sikis
Short Reads

FAQ: when does the Activities decree apply?

FAQ: when does the Activities decree apply?

FAQ: when does the Activities decree apply?

16.03.2016 NL law

This is an article entry in the FAQ-series.

Some general information:

  • Establishments: the Activities Decree only applies to establishments
  • Main rule: the general rules in the Activities Decree
  • Exception: the environmental permit

The Activities Decree without an environmental permit

Whether an activity falls within the scope of the Activities Decree can be determined by following the next two steps.

  1. The activity qualifies as an establishment under the Environmental Management Act (hereinafter: EMA)

This is the case if:

  • The activity qualifies as an establishment under article 1.1, subsection 1 of the EMA. In short, this applies if the activity is performed i) for a certain period of time, usually six months or more, or on a regular basis, ii) in the same location, and iii) as a business or has a business scope, and:
  • The activity falls under the scope of one of the categories of division B or division C of annex I of the Environmental Permitting Decree (hereinafter: EPD). This division contains 29 categories (article 1.1 subsection 3 Environmental Planning Act, article 1.1 subsection 4 EMA article 1.1 subsection 3 EMA, article 2.1 subsection 1 EPD).

For a more elaborate explanation of the qualification of an activity as an establishment, clickhere.

  1. The establishment is not designated as one that is obligated to have a permit in annex I sections B and C of the EPD but activities that fall under the scope of the Activities Decree are carried out in the establishment.

For a more elaborate explanation of the obligation to have a permit for an establishment, click here.

Evidently, only those sections of the Activities Decree apply to establishments if the activities they concern take place. For example: regulations concerning cooling towers do not apply to establishments that do not contain a cooling tower.

Intermezzo: Type A-establishments (no notification necessary) and type B-establishments (notification necessary)

The Activities Decree applies to establishment types A, B and C, according to article 1.2. It is clear that only establishments fall under the scope of the Activities Decree. To tell which sections of the Activities Decree apply , it is important to determine what type of establishment it concerns.

A. A type A-establishment is one that:

  • Does not require an environmental permit for constructing, operating or altering an establishment, and;
  • Meets the criteria of article 1.2 of the Activities Decree. This concerns establishments with limited effects on the environment such as office buildings or small stores.
  • Type A-establishments do not require a notification

B. A type B-establishment is one that:

  • Does not require an environmental permit for constructing, operating or altering an establishment, and;
  • Is not a type A-establishment

Type B-establishments require a notification according to article 1.9b, subsection a of the Activities Decree.

The Activities Decree and an environmental permit

  1. The first step is the same as the first step described above
  1. The establishment is designated as one that is obligated to have a permit (article 2.1, subsection 2 EPD) and the Activities Decree applies to the activities taking place in the establishment.

For a more elaborate explanation of the obligation to have a permit for establishments, click here.

Similarly, the Activities Decree only applies if relevant activities take place in that establishment.

Intermezzo: type C-establishments

A type C-establishment is one that:

a. Requires an environmental permit for constructing, operating or altering an establishment

b. For type C-establishments an obligation to notify the competent authority applies according to article 1.9b, subsection b of the Activities Decree, insofar it concerns activities that chapter 3 of the Activities Decree applies to.

Type C-establishments are, as explained previously, establishments that are obliged to have a permit. Regulations for these establishments can therefore be found in the permit itself. In addition, the regulations from the Activities Decree also apply.

Note that when a type C-establishment needs to be altered, it is necessary to assess whether there is  an obligation to notify the competent authority. As explained previously, this is the case when (at least one of) the activities taking place in the establishment fall under the scope of chapter 3 of the Activities Decree. Also, it is important to determine whether the alteration conforms with the permit. If not, a new permit is needed for this alteration. Therefore, there may be instances when a the alteration to an establishment leads to a notification for the competent authorities and a new permit.

The post FAQ: when does the Activities decree apply?  is a post of www.stibbeblog.nl

Team

Related news

29.01.2021 NL law
Podcast: Nederlands bestuursprocesrecht in strijd met Verdrag van Aarhus

Short Reads - Nederlanders is jarenlang ten onrechte de toegang tot de rechter ontzegd. Zo bepaalde het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie eerder deze maand. Als je het in Nederland oneens bent met een omgevingsbesluit, maar in een voortijdig stadium geen zienswijze had ingediend mocht je volgens de wet (6:13 Awb) niet naar de rechter stappen. Dit wetsartikel blijkt nu in strijd met het Europese Verdrag van Aarhus.

Read more

27.01.2021 NL law
20ste tranche Besluit uitvoering Crisis en herstelwet (BuChw) in werking getreden: uitzondering plan-m.e.r.-plicht voor kleine projecten voer voor procedures?

Short Reads - Op 18 december 2020 is de 20ste tranche van het Besluit uitvoering Crisis- en herstelwet (BuChw) in werking getreden. Deze tranche voorziet er onder meer in dat voor bestemmingsplannen die zien op kleine projecten waarvoor een passende beoordeling moet worden gemaakt, niet automatisch ook een milieueffectrapportage voor plannen (“plan-m.e.r.“) hoeft te worden verricht. In dit blogbericht bespreken wij deze wijziging.

Read more

28.01.2021 BE law
Update on Climate Change Litigation

Articles - One year after the Dutch Supreme Court upheld the Urgenda decision, climate change litigation is still trending. In this blog, we will inform you on four developments in the climate change litigation landscape that build on the principles laid down in the Urgenda case law, while also giving rise to new questions.

Read more

27.01.2021 NL law
De meerjarenafspraken energie-efficiëntie (MJA3/MEE) zijn afgelopen: wat betekent dat voor de energiebesparingsverplichtingen van bedrijven?

Short Reads - In het kader van de Meerjarenafspraken energie-efficiëntie – ook wel de MJA3/MEE-convenanten – werkten ruim 1.000 bedrijven uit 40 sectoren de afgelopen jaren aan energiebesparing en CO2-reductie. De convenanten liepen af op 31 december 2020, maar dat betekent niet dat ook de verplichtingen voor bedrijven om zich in te zetten voor energiebesparing ophouden te bestaan. In dit blogbericht zetten wij de belangrijkste gevolgen van het aflopen van de convenanten en de op dit moment geldende verplichtingen op een rij.   

Read more

26.01.2021 NL law
Beoordelingskader voor intrekking natuurvergunningen en geen vergunningplicht bij intern salderen: een duidelijke uitspraak

Short Reads - Op 20 januari 2021 deed de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State (“Afdeling”) uitspraak over een verzoek tot intrekking van de natuurvergunning van een veehouderij. Deze uitspraak is een blogbericht waard, omdat hierin (i) het kader voor het intrekken van natuurtoestemmingen uiteen wordt gezet en (ii) de Afdeling duidelijk maakt dat als een project wel enige, maar geen significante gevolgen voor Natura 2000-gebieden heeft, er geen vergunningplicht geldt. Dit laatste geldt ook in het geval van intern salderen. Hierna schetsen wij kort het oordeel van de Afdeling.

Read more