Articles

Towards the Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC)

Towards the Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC)

Towards the Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC)

23.02.2016 NL law

In September 2014 the Chairman of the Judiciary expressed its ambition to establish a Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC) to provide a special court designed to deal with large international disputes. This ambition resulted in  a final plan, which was published in November 2015. The aim is to have a fully operational NCC by 1 January 2017.

 

The NCC will be housed in the Amsterdam District Court and any appeals will be heard in the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. It will focus primarily on major international commercial disputes submitted  by parties pursuant to a contract or a subsequent agreement. Nonetheless Dutch parties can also choose to bring a commercial dispute without international character before the NCC.

Positive effects of the NCC

The Judiciary expects the establishment of the NCC to have a positive impact on  litigants and on the legal system in general. The NCC will be a special facility with dedicated judges who have the necessary expertise and experience in large commercial disputes. These judges can share their knowledge to ensure the quality of justice is promoted and complex cases can be handled more efficiently. Research carried out by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) also showed that having a dedicated court like the NCC in the Netherlands would benefit potential users, by making such procedures more effective and efficient and ultimately less costly.  In addition, the NCC can provide more customization and transparency in international practice.

The NCC will also offer users the opportunity to litigate in English. This fits well with international practice and can save time and translation costs. It should also facilitate smooth communication between foreign parties.

Legislation

In a letter dated 23 November 2015, the Minister of Security and Justice indicated to the house that he remains positive about the NCC proposal and stressed that it is not intended that the cost of handling cases by the NCC be  borne by the Judiciary. The establishment of the NCC should not be provided at the expense of other civil cases. On the contrary,  it is intended that these other cases will benefit from the NCC because of the separate treatment of major trade disputes, which frees up more time for other disputes. According to the Minister, companies bringing cases before the NCC will be expected to pay the costs for using this service. Given that the court will deal with large commercial disputes, the NCC costs are likely to be small in comparison to the overall legal fees incurred. However, it is possible for those companies that cannot afford the NCC fees  to apply to the court to waive the costs in full or in part. Therefore, the NCC is also attractive for small or start-up companies involved in contract disputes with large international companies.

The Minister has made a commitment that the government will come up with a bill in mid-2016 to regulate the use of the English language and funding.

The post Towards the Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC) is a post of www.stibbeblog.nl

 

Related news

04.06.2019 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court clarifies evidentiary rules concerning signatures and signed documents

Short Reads - In two recent decisions, the Dutch Supreme Court has clarified the evidentiary power of signed documents. If the signatory unambiguously denies that the signature on the document is his or hers or claims that another party has tampered with the signature (for instance, through forgery or copying a signature from one document and pasting it in another), it is up to the party invoking the signed document to prove the signature's authenticity (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:572).

Read more

24.05.2019 NL law
European regulatory initiatives for online platforms and search engines

Short Reads - As part of the digital economy, the rise of online platforms and search engines raises all kinds of legal questions. For example, do bicycle couriers qualify as employees who are entitled to ordinary labour law protections? Or should they be considered self-employed (see our Stibbe website on this issue)? The rise of online platforms also triggers more general legal questions on the relationship between online platforms and their users. Importantly, the European Union is becoming increasingly active in this field.

Read more

03.06.2019 NL law
Toerekening van kennis van groepsvennootschappen

Articles - In de praktijk doet zich vaak de vraag voor of kennis die aanwezig is binnen de ene vennootschap kan worden toegerekend aan een andere vennootschap binnen hetzelfde concern. In dit artikel verkent Branda Katan zowel de dogmatische grondslag als de praktische toepassing van een dergelijke toerekening. Zij concludeert dat het ‘Babbel-criterium’ (heeft in de gegeven omstandigheden de kennis X in het maatschappelijk verkeer te gelden als kennis van Y?) geschikt is voor het toerekenen van kennis in concernverband.

Read more

01.05.2019 NL law
Arbitral award obligating Ecuador to prevent enforcement of USD 8.6 billion order does not violate public order

Short Reads - Due to environmental damage as a result of oil extraction in the Ecuadorian Amazon, oil company Chevron was ordered to pay USD 8.6 billion to Ecuadorian citizens. In order to claim release of liability, Chevron and Texaco initiated arbitration proceedings against Ecuador. Arbitral awards ordered Ecuador to prevent enforcement of the Ecuadorian judgment, leaving the Ecuadorian plaintiffs temporarily unable to enforce their judgment. According to the Supreme Court (12 April 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:565), these arbitral awards did however not violate public order.

Read more

28.05.2019 NL law
Dutch court: insufficient substantiation? No follow-on cartel damages action

Short Reads - Dutch courts are forcing claimants (including claims vehicles) to be well-prepared before initiating follow-on actions. The Amsterdam District Court in the Dutch trucks cartel follow-on proceedings recently ruled that claimants – specifically CDC, STCC, Chapelton, K&D c.s. and STEF c.s. – had insufficiently substantiated their claims. These claimants now have until 18 September 2019 to provide sufficient facts regarding transactions that – according to them – were affected by the cartel. Preparation should thus be key for cartel damages actions.

Read more

01.05.2019 NL law
Termination of an agreement: compelling grounds?

Short Reads - When does a reason given for termination of an agreement qualify as a compelling ground? That was the central question in the Dutch Supreme Court's decision of 29 March 2019 (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:446). Depending on the nature of the agreement and the circumstances of the case, termination may only take place under certain conditions, e.g. only on compelling grounds. 

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring